Cargando…
Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
PURPOSE: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting. METHOD: We took a random sample from the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trial Regis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987318782783 |
_version_ | 1783427426233090048 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Blair Burnett, Peter Moher, David Altman, Douglas G Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam |
author_facet | Wilson, Blair Burnett, Peter Moher, David Altman, Douglas G Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam |
author_sort | Wilson, Blair |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting. METHOD: We took a random sample from the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trial Register of transient ischaemic attack or stroke randomised controlled trials, published in English in 1997–2016 inclusive. Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final primary results of stroke randomised controlled trials with a 10-point truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting checklist to investigate adherence over time, univariable associations and independent associations with total Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting score in a multiple linear regression model. FINDINGS: In this random sample of 177 stroke randomised controlled trials, the mean score on the truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials checklist was 5.8 (SD 2.2); reporting improved from 1997–2000 (4.9 SD 2.0) to 2001–2009 (5.8 SD 2.1) and to 2010–2016 (6.8 SD 2.1). A higher Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials score was independently associated with publication during epochs following a revision of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines (p < 0.001), journal endorsement of the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guideline at the time of randomised controlled trial publication (p < 0.001) and modified journal impact factor using median citation distribution (p = 0.012). DISCUSSION: Stroke randomised controlled trial reporting to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials standards has improved over time, but could be better. CONCLUSION: Journal endorsement and enforcement of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines could further improve the reporting of stroke randomised controlled trials. Systematic review registration: Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017072193). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6571510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65715102019-06-24 Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review Wilson, Blair Burnett, Peter Moher, David Altman, Douglas G Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam Eur Stroke J Review Article PURPOSE: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting. METHOD: We took a random sample from the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trial Register of transient ischaemic attack or stroke randomised controlled trials, published in English in 1997–2016 inclusive. Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final primary results of stroke randomised controlled trials with a 10-point truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting checklist to investigate adherence over time, univariable associations and independent associations with total Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting score in a multiple linear regression model. FINDINGS: In this random sample of 177 stroke randomised controlled trials, the mean score on the truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials checklist was 5.8 (SD 2.2); reporting improved from 1997–2000 (4.9 SD 2.0) to 2001–2009 (5.8 SD 2.1) and to 2010–2016 (6.8 SD 2.1). A higher Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials score was independently associated with publication during epochs following a revision of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines (p < 0.001), journal endorsement of the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guideline at the time of randomised controlled trial publication (p < 0.001) and modified journal impact factor using median citation distribution (p = 0.012). DISCUSSION: Stroke randomised controlled trial reporting to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials standards has improved over time, but could be better. CONCLUSION: Journal endorsement and enforcement of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines could further improve the reporting of stroke randomised controlled trials. Systematic review registration: Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017072193). SAGE Publications 2018-06-20 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6571510/ /pubmed/31236481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987318782783 Text en © European Stroke Organisation 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wilson, Blair Burnett, Peter Moher, David Altman, Douglas G Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review |
title | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including
people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic
review |
title_full | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including
people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic
review |
title_fullStr | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including
people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic
review |
title_full_unstemmed | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including
people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic
review |
title_short | Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including
people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic
review |
title_sort | completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including
people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a systematic
review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987318782783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonblair completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT burnettpeter completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT moherdavid completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT altmandouglasg completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview AT alshahisalmanrustam completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview |