Cargando…

Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review

PURPOSE: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting. METHOD: We took a random sample from the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trial Regis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Blair, Burnett, Peter, Moher, David, Altman, Douglas G, Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987318782783
_version_ 1783427426233090048
author Wilson, Blair
Burnett, Peter
Moher, David
Altman, Douglas G
Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
author_facet Wilson, Blair
Burnett, Peter
Moher, David
Altman, Douglas G
Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
author_sort Wilson, Blair
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting. METHOD: We took a random sample from the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trial Register of transient ischaemic attack or stroke randomised controlled trials, published in English in 1997–2016 inclusive. Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final primary results of stroke randomised controlled trials with a 10-point truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting checklist to investigate adherence over time, univariable associations and independent associations with total Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting score in a multiple linear regression model. FINDINGS: In this random sample of 177 stroke randomised controlled trials, the mean score on the truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials checklist was 5.8 (SD 2.2); reporting improved from 1997–2000 (4.9 SD 2.0) to 2001–2009 (5.8 SD 2.1) and to 2010–2016 (6.8 SD 2.1). A higher Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials score was independently associated with publication during epochs following a revision of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines (p < 0.001), journal endorsement of the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guideline at the time of randomised controlled trial publication (p < 0.001) and modified journal impact factor using median citation distribution (p = 0.012). DISCUSSION: Stroke randomised controlled trial reporting to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials standards has improved over time, but could be better. CONCLUSION: Journal endorsement and enforcement of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines could further improve the reporting of stroke randomised controlled trials. Systematic review registration: Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017072193).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65715102019-06-24 Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review Wilson, Blair Burnett, Peter Moher, David Altman, Douglas G Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam Eur Stroke J Review Article PURPOSE: To assess the adherence of stroke randomised controlled trials to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines and investigate the factors that are associated with completeness of reporting. METHOD: We took a random sample from the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trial Register of transient ischaemic attack or stroke randomised controlled trials, published in English in 1997–2016 inclusive. Two reviewers assessed the published report of the final primary results of stroke randomised controlled trials with a 10-point truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting checklist to investigate adherence over time, univariable associations and independent associations with total Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting score in a multiple linear regression model. FINDINGS: In this random sample of 177 stroke randomised controlled trials, the mean score on the truncated Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials checklist was 5.8 (SD 2.2); reporting improved from 1997–2000 (4.9 SD 2.0) to 2001–2009 (5.8 SD 2.1) and to 2010–2016 (6.8 SD 2.1). A higher Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials score was independently associated with publication during epochs following a revision of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines (p < 0.001), journal endorsement of the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guideline at the time of randomised controlled trial publication (p < 0.001) and modified journal impact factor using median citation distribution (p = 0.012). DISCUSSION: Stroke randomised controlled trial reporting to Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials standards has improved over time, but could be better. CONCLUSION: Journal endorsement and enforcement of Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials reporting guidelines could further improve the reporting of stroke randomised controlled trials. Systematic review registration: Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017072193). SAGE Publications 2018-06-20 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6571510/ /pubmed/31236481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987318782783 Text en © European Stroke Organisation 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Wilson, Blair
Burnett, Peter
Moher, David
Altman, Douglas G
Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam
Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
title Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
title_full Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
title_fullStr Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
title_short Completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: A systematic review
title_sort completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials including people with transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987318782783
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonblair completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview
AT burnettpeter completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview
AT moherdavid completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview
AT altmandouglasg completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview
AT alshahisalmanrustam completenessofreportingofrandomisedcontrolledtrialsincludingpeoplewithtransientischaemicattackorstrokeasystematicreview