Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments

Background. The aim of the present study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel titanium rotary pathfinding instruments. Methods. Twenty instruments were selected for each file system. A simulated stainless steel root canal, with a 90° angle of curvature and a curvature radius...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kırıcı, Damla Özsu, Karataş, Ertuğrul, Uygun, Ahmet Demirhan, Doğanay Yıldız, Ezgi, Çolak, Kezban Meltem, Arslan, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217920
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.009
_version_ 1783427428630134784
author Kırıcı, Damla Özsu
Karataş, Ertuğrul
Uygun, Ahmet Demirhan
Doğanay Yıldız, Ezgi
Çolak, Kezban Meltem
Arslan, Hakan
author_facet Kırıcı, Damla Özsu
Karataş, Ertuğrul
Uygun, Ahmet Demirhan
Doğanay Yıldız, Ezgi
Çolak, Kezban Meltem
Arslan, Hakan
author_sort Kırıcı, Damla Özsu
collection PubMed
description Background. The aim of the present study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel titanium rotary pathfinding instruments. Methods. Twenty instruments were selected for each file system. A simulated stainless steel root canal, with a 90° angle of curvature and a curvature radius of 3 mm, was used for cyclic fatigue test of the ProGlider (#16, progressive taper: 0.02‒ 0.085), PathGlider (#15, taper: .03), and One G (#14, taper: .03) instruments. Statistical analyses were performed with oneway ANOVA (P=0.05). Post hoc Tukey tests were used to determine any statistically significant differences between the groups. Results. The ProGlider instruments exhibited significantly more cyclic fatigue resistance than both PathGlider and One G instruments (P<0.001). One G instruments had significantly more resistance to fracture than PathGlider instruments (P<0.05). Conclusion. ProGlider instruments had better cyclic fatigue resistance than PathGlider and One G instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65715222019-06-19 Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments Kırıcı, Damla Özsu Karataş, Ertuğrul Uygun, Ahmet Demirhan Doğanay Yıldız, Ezgi Çolak, Kezban Meltem Arslan, Hakan J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The aim of the present study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel titanium rotary pathfinding instruments. Methods. Twenty instruments were selected for each file system. A simulated stainless steel root canal, with a 90° angle of curvature and a curvature radius of 3 mm, was used for cyclic fatigue test of the ProGlider (#16, progressive taper: 0.02‒ 0.085), PathGlider (#15, taper: .03), and One G (#14, taper: .03) instruments. Statistical analyses were performed with oneway ANOVA (P=0.05). Post hoc Tukey tests were used to determine any statistically significant differences between the groups. Results. The ProGlider instruments exhibited significantly more cyclic fatigue resistance than both PathGlider and One G instruments (P<0.001). One G instruments had significantly more resistance to fracture than PathGlider instruments (P<0.05). Conclusion. ProGlider instruments had better cyclic fatigue resistance than PathGlider and One G instruments. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2019 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6571522/ /pubmed/31217920 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.009 Text en © 2019 Özsu Kırıcı et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kırıcı, Damla Özsu
Karataş, Ertuğrul
Uygun, Ahmet Demirhan
Doğanay Yıldız, Ezgi
Çolak, Kezban Meltem
Arslan, Hakan
Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments
title Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments
title_full Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments
title_fullStr Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments
title_short Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments
title_sort comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of proglider, pathglider and one g path-finding instruments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217920
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.009
work_keys_str_mv AT kırıcıdamlaozsu comparisonofthecyclicfatigueresistanceofprogliderpathgliderandonegpathfindinginstruments
AT karatasertugrul comparisonofthecyclicfatigueresistanceofprogliderpathgliderandonegpathfindinginstruments
AT uygunahmetdemirhan comparisonofthecyclicfatigueresistanceofprogliderpathgliderandonegpathfindinginstruments
AT doganayyıldızezgi comparisonofthecyclicfatigueresistanceofprogliderpathgliderandonegpathfindinginstruments
AT colakkezbanmeltem comparisonofthecyclicfatigueresistanceofprogliderpathgliderandonegpathfindinginstruments
AT arslanhakan comparisonofthecyclicfatigueresistanceofprogliderpathgliderandonegpathfindinginstruments

Ejemplares similares