Cargando…

Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area

Background: Lung cancer misdiagnosed as tuberculosis (TB) is not rare, but the factors associated with early diagnosis revision remain unclear. Methods: We screened the cases with TB notification from 2007 to 2018 and reviewed those with misdiagnosis with a revised diagnosis to lung cancer. We analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Chin-Chung, Chang, Shih-Chieh, Lai, Yi-Chun, Chang, Cheng-Yu, Wei, Yu-Feng, Chen, Chung-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31108871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050700
_version_ 1783427465076539392
author Shu, Chin-Chung
Chang, Shih-Chieh
Lai, Yi-Chun
Chang, Cheng-Yu
Wei, Yu-Feng
Chen, Chung-Yu
author_facet Shu, Chin-Chung
Chang, Shih-Chieh
Lai, Yi-Chun
Chang, Cheng-Yu
Wei, Yu-Feng
Chen, Chung-Yu
author_sort Shu, Chin-Chung
collection PubMed
description Background: Lung cancer misdiagnosed as tuberculosis (TB) is not rare, but the factors associated with early diagnosis revision remain unclear. Methods: We screened the cases with TB notification from 2007 to 2018 and reviewed those with misdiagnosis with a revised diagnosis to lung cancer. We analyzed the factors associated with early diagnosis revision (≤1 months) and early obtained pathology (≤1 months) using multivariable Cox regression. Results: During the study period, 45 (0.7%) of 6683 patients were initially notified as having TB, but later diagnosed with lung cancer. The reasons for the original impression of TB were mostly due to image suspicion (51%) and positive sputum acid-fast stain (AFS) (27%). Using multivariable Cox proportional regression, early diagnosis revision was associated with obtaining the pathology early, lack of anti-TB treatment, and negative sputum AFS. Furthermore, the predictors for early obtained pathology included large lesion size (>3 cm), presence of a miliary radiological pattern, no anti-TB treatment, and a culture-negative result when testing for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) using multivariable Cox regression. Conclusion: In patients who are suspected to have TB but no mycobacterial evidence is present, lung cancer should be kept in mind and pathology needs to be obtained early, especially for those with small lesions, radiological findings other than the miliary pattern, and a culture positive for NTM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6571679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65716792019-06-18 Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area Shu, Chin-Chung Chang, Shih-Chieh Lai, Yi-Chun Chang, Cheng-Yu Wei, Yu-Feng Chen, Chung-Yu J Clin Med Article Background: Lung cancer misdiagnosed as tuberculosis (TB) is not rare, but the factors associated with early diagnosis revision remain unclear. Methods: We screened the cases with TB notification from 2007 to 2018 and reviewed those with misdiagnosis with a revised diagnosis to lung cancer. We analyzed the factors associated with early diagnosis revision (≤1 months) and early obtained pathology (≤1 months) using multivariable Cox regression. Results: During the study period, 45 (0.7%) of 6683 patients were initially notified as having TB, but later diagnosed with lung cancer. The reasons for the original impression of TB were mostly due to image suspicion (51%) and positive sputum acid-fast stain (AFS) (27%). Using multivariable Cox proportional regression, early diagnosis revision was associated with obtaining the pathology early, lack of anti-TB treatment, and negative sputum AFS. Furthermore, the predictors for early obtained pathology included large lesion size (>3 cm), presence of a miliary radiological pattern, no anti-TB treatment, and a culture-negative result when testing for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) using multivariable Cox regression. Conclusion: In patients who are suspected to have TB but no mycobacterial evidence is present, lung cancer should be kept in mind and pathology needs to be obtained early, especially for those with small lesions, radiological findings other than the miliary pattern, and a culture positive for NTM. MDPI 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6571679/ /pubmed/31108871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050700 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shu, Chin-Chung
Chang, Shih-Chieh
Lai, Yi-Chun
Chang, Cheng-Yu
Wei, Yu-Feng
Chen, Chung-Yu
Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area
title Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area
title_full Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area
title_fullStr Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area
title_full_unstemmed Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area
title_short Factors for the Early Revision of Misdiagnosed Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in A Tuberculosis-Prevalent Area
title_sort factors for the early revision of misdiagnosed tuberculosis to lung cancer: a multicenter study in a tuberculosis-prevalent area
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31108871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050700
work_keys_str_mv AT shuchinchung factorsfortheearlyrevisionofmisdiagnosedtuberculosistolungcanceramulticenterstudyinatuberculosisprevalentarea
AT changshihchieh factorsfortheearlyrevisionofmisdiagnosedtuberculosistolungcanceramulticenterstudyinatuberculosisprevalentarea
AT laiyichun factorsfortheearlyrevisionofmisdiagnosedtuberculosistolungcanceramulticenterstudyinatuberculosisprevalentarea
AT changchengyu factorsfortheearlyrevisionofmisdiagnosedtuberculosistolungcanceramulticenterstudyinatuberculosisprevalentarea
AT weiyufeng factorsfortheearlyrevisionofmisdiagnosedtuberculosistolungcanceramulticenterstudyinatuberculosisprevalentarea
AT chenchungyu factorsfortheearlyrevisionofmisdiagnosedtuberculosistolungcanceramulticenterstudyinatuberculosisprevalentarea