Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults

The aim of the present study was to investigate the concurrent validity and the test–retest reliability of an electronic contact mat for drop jump assessment in physically active adults. Seventy-nine young, physically active adults participated in the validity study, and 49 subjects were recruited f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tenelsen, Florian, Brueckner, Dennis, Muehlbauer, Thomas, Hagen, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31100833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7050114
_version_ 1783427592102084608
author Tenelsen, Florian
Brueckner, Dennis
Muehlbauer, Thomas
Hagen, Marco
author_facet Tenelsen, Florian
Brueckner, Dennis
Muehlbauer, Thomas
Hagen, Marco
author_sort Tenelsen, Florian
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to investigate the concurrent validity and the test–retest reliability of an electronic contact mat for drop jump assessment in physically active adults. Seventy-nine young, physically active adults participated in the validity study, and 49 subjects were recruited for the reliability study. The motor task required subjects to perform two-legged drop jumps using drop heights of 24, 43, and 62 cm as well as one-legged drop jumps with the left and right leg using a drop height of 24 cm. Ground contact times were simultaneously quantified with an electronic contact mat, a force plate (i.e., gold standard), and a light-barrier system (another criterion device). Concurrent validity was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), systematic bias, limits of agreement, and linear regression analysis. Test–retest reliability (one week apart) was determined by calculating the ICC, the standard error of measurement (SEM), the coefficient of variation (CV), and Lin´s concordance correlation coefficient (р(c)). Further, we determined the minimal detectable change (MDC(95%)). Irrespective of drop height and jump condition, good agreements between testing devices (ICC ≥ 0.95) were shown. Compared to the force plate (−0.6 to 3.1 ms) but not to the light-barrier system (31.4 to 41.7 ms), the contact mat showed low systematic bias values. In terms of test–retest reliability, our analyses showed that the measuring devices are in agreement (ICC: 0.70–0.92; SEM: 8.5–18.4 ms; CV: 3.6–6.4%). Depending on the measurement device, drop height, and jump condition, a MDC(95%) value ranging from 23.6 to 50.9 ms represents the minimum amount of change needed to identify practical relevant effects in repeated measurements of drop jump performance. Our findings indicate that the electronic contact mat is a valid and reliable testing device for drop jump assessment from different drop heights in young physically active adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6572231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65722312019-06-18 Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults Tenelsen, Florian Brueckner, Dennis Muehlbauer, Thomas Hagen, Marco Sports (Basel) Article The aim of the present study was to investigate the concurrent validity and the test–retest reliability of an electronic contact mat for drop jump assessment in physically active adults. Seventy-nine young, physically active adults participated in the validity study, and 49 subjects were recruited for the reliability study. The motor task required subjects to perform two-legged drop jumps using drop heights of 24, 43, and 62 cm as well as one-legged drop jumps with the left and right leg using a drop height of 24 cm. Ground contact times were simultaneously quantified with an electronic contact mat, a force plate (i.e., gold standard), and a light-barrier system (another criterion device). Concurrent validity was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), systematic bias, limits of agreement, and linear regression analysis. Test–retest reliability (one week apart) was determined by calculating the ICC, the standard error of measurement (SEM), the coefficient of variation (CV), and Lin´s concordance correlation coefficient (р(c)). Further, we determined the minimal detectable change (MDC(95%)). Irrespective of drop height and jump condition, good agreements between testing devices (ICC ≥ 0.95) were shown. Compared to the force plate (−0.6 to 3.1 ms) but not to the light-barrier system (31.4 to 41.7 ms), the contact mat showed low systematic bias values. In terms of test–retest reliability, our analyses showed that the measuring devices are in agreement (ICC: 0.70–0.92; SEM: 8.5–18.4 ms; CV: 3.6–6.4%). Depending on the measurement device, drop height, and jump condition, a MDC(95%) value ranging from 23.6 to 50.9 ms represents the minimum amount of change needed to identify practical relevant effects in repeated measurements of drop jump performance. Our findings indicate that the electronic contact mat is a valid and reliable testing device for drop jump assessment from different drop heights in young physically active adults. MDPI 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6572231/ /pubmed/31100833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7050114 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tenelsen, Florian
Brueckner, Dennis
Muehlbauer, Thomas
Hagen, Marco
Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults
title Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults
title_full Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults
title_short Validity and Reliability of an Electronic Contact Mat for Drop Jump Assessment in Physically Active Adults
title_sort validity and reliability of an electronic contact mat for drop jump assessment in physically active adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31100833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7050114
work_keys_str_mv AT tenelsenflorian validityandreliabilityofanelectroniccontactmatfordropjumpassessmentinphysicallyactiveadults
AT bruecknerdennis validityandreliabilityofanelectroniccontactmatfordropjumpassessmentinphysicallyactiveadults
AT muehlbauerthomas validityandreliabilityofanelectroniccontactmatfordropjumpassessmentinphysicallyactiveadults
AT hagenmarco validityandreliabilityofanelectroniccontactmatfordropjumpassessmentinphysicallyactiveadults