Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner–McLeish, Likhtman–McLeish...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11050754 |
_version_ | 1783427617116913664 |
---|---|
author | Shchetnikava, Volha Slot, Johan van Ruymbeke, Evelyne |
author_facet | Shchetnikava, Volha Slot, Johan van Ruymbeke, Evelyne |
author_sort | Shchetnikava, Volha |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner–McLeish, Likhtman–McLeish, the Hierarchical model proposed by the group of Larson, the BoB model of Das and Read, and the TMA model proposed by the group of van Ruymbeke. This comparison allows us to highlight and discuss important questions related to the relaxation of entangled polymers, such as the importance of the contour-length fluctuations (CLF) process and how it affects the reptation mechanism, or the contribution of the constraint release (CR) process on the motion of the chains. In particular, it allows us to point out important approximations, inherent in some models, which result in an overestimation of the effect of CLF on the reptation time. On the contrary, by validating the TMA model against experimental data, we show that this effect is underestimated in TMA. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate predictions, a novel modification to the TMA model is proposed. Our current work is a continuation of earlier research (Shchetnikava et al., 2014), where a similar analysis is performed on well-defined star polymers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6572337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65723372019-06-18 Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers Shchetnikava, Volha Slot, Johan van Ruymbeke, Evelyne Polymers (Basel) Article The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner–McLeish, Likhtman–McLeish, the Hierarchical model proposed by the group of Larson, the BoB model of Das and Read, and the TMA model proposed by the group of van Ruymbeke. This comparison allows us to highlight and discuss important questions related to the relaxation of entangled polymers, such as the importance of the contour-length fluctuations (CLF) process and how it affects the reptation mechanism, or the contribution of the constraint release (CR) process on the motion of the chains. In particular, it allows us to point out important approximations, inherent in some models, which result in an overestimation of the effect of CLF on the reptation time. On the contrary, by validating the TMA model against experimental data, we show that this effect is underestimated in TMA. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate predictions, a novel modification to the TMA model is proposed. Our current work is a continuation of earlier research (Shchetnikava et al., 2014), where a similar analysis is performed on well-defined star polymers. MDPI 2019-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6572337/ /pubmed/31035419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11050754 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shchetnikava, Volha Slot, Johan van Ruymbeke, Evelyne Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers |
title | Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers |
title_sort | comparative analysis of different tube models for linear rheology of monodisperse linear entangled polymers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11050754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shchetnikavavolha comparativeanalysisofdifferenttubemodelsforlinearrheologyofmonodisperselinearentangledpolymers AT slotjohan comparativeanalysisofdifferenttubemodelsforlinearrheologyofmonodisperselinearentangledpolymers AT vanruymbekeevelyne comparativeanalysisofdifferenttubemodelsforlinearrheologyofmonodisperselinearentangledpolymers |