Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers

The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner–McLeish, Likhtman–McLeish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shchetnikava, Volha, Slot, Johan, van Ruymbeke, Evelyne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11050754
_version_ 1783427617116913664
author Shchetnikava, Volha
Slot, Johan
van Ruymbeke, Evelyne
author_facet Shchetnikava, Volha
Slot, Johan
van Ruymbeke, Evelyne
author_sort Shchetnikava, Volha
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner–McLeish, Likhtman–McLeish, the Hierarchical model proposed by the group of Larson, the BoB model of Das and Read, and the TMA model proposed by the group of van Ruymbeke. This comparison allows us to highlight and discuss important questions related to the relaxation of entangled polymers, such as the importance of the contour-length fluctuations (CLF) process and how it affects the reptation mechanism, or the contribution of the constraint release (CR) process on the motion of the chains. In particular, it allows us to point out important approximations, inherent in some models, which result in an overestimation of the effect of CLF on the reptation time. On the contrary, by validating the TMA model against experimental data, we show that this effect is underestimated in TMA. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate predictions, a novel modification to the TMA model is proposed. Our current work is a continuation of earlier research (Shchetnikava et al., 2014), where a similar analysis is performed on well-defined star polymers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6572337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65723372019-06-18 Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers Shchetnikava, Volha Slot, Johan van Ruymbeke, Evelyne Polymers (Basel) Article The aim of the present paper is to analyse the differences between tube-based models which are widely used for predicting the linear viscoelasticity of monodisperse linear polymers, in comparison to a large set of experimental data. The following models are examined: Milner–McLeish, Likhtman–McLeish, the Hierarchical model proposed by the group of Larson, the BoB model of Das and Read, and the TMA model proposed by the group of van Ruymbeke. This comparison allows us to highlight and discuss important questions related to the relaxation of entangled polymers, such as the importance of the contour-length fluctuations (CLF) process and how it affects the reptation mechanism, or the contribution of the constraint release (CR) process on the motion of the chains. In particular, it allows us to point out important approximations, inherent in some models, which result in an overestimation of the effect of CLF on the reptation time. On the contrary, by validating the TMA model against experimental data, we show that this effect is underestimated in TMA. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate predictions, a novel modification to the TMA model is proposed. Our current work is a continuation of earlier research (Shchetnikava et al., 2014), where a similar analysis is performed on well-defined star polymers. MDPI 2019-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6572337/ /pubmed/31035419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11050754 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shchetnikava, Volha
Slot, Johan
van Ruymbeke, Evelyne
Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
title Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
title_full Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
title_short Comparative Analysis of Different Tube Models for Linear Rheology of Monodisperse Linear Entangled Polymers
title_sort comparative analysis of different tube models for linear rheology of monodisperse linear entangled polymers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11050754
work_keys_str_mv AT shchetnikavavolha comparativeanalysisofdifferenttubemodelsforlinearrheologyofmonodisperselinearentangledpolymers
AT slotjohan comparativeanalysisofdifferenttubemodelsforlinearrheologyofmonodisperselinearentangledpolymers
AT vanruymbekeevelyne comparativeanalysisofdifferenttubemodelsforlinearrheologyofmonodisperselinearentangledpolymers