Cargando…

Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?

Purpose: This study examined whether change in physician engagement affected outpatient or resident physician satisfaction using common US measures. Methods: Surveys were administered by Advisory Board Survey Solutions for staff physician engagement, Press Ganey for Clinician and Group Consumer Asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scher, Eric, Whitehouse, Sarah, Van Harn, Meredith, Bollinger, John, Stevens, Bret, Macki, Kathy, Saoud, Deborah, Baker-Genaw, Kimberly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354375
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S201060
_version_ 1783427691576295424
author Scher, Eric
Whitehouse, Sarah
Van Harn, Meredith
Bollinger, John
Stevens, Bret
Macki, Kathy
Saoud, Deborah
Baker-Genaw, Kimberly
author_facet Scher, Eric
Whitehouse, Sarah
Van Harn, Meredith
Bollinger, John
Stevens, Bret
Macki, Kathy
Saoud, Deborah
Baker-Genaw, Kimberly
author_sort Scher, Eric
collection PubMed
description Purpose: This study examined whether change in physician engagement affected outpatient or resident physician satisfaction using common US measures. Methods: Surveys were administered by Advisory Board Survey Solutions for staff physician engagement, Press Ganey for Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CGCAHPS) for outpatient satisfaction, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for the ACGME Resident/Fellow Survey. Survey sample sizes were 685, 697, and 763 for physician engagement and 621, 625, and 618 for resident satisfaction in 2014–2016, respectively; only respondents were available for CGCAHPS (24,302, 34,328, and 43,100 for 2014–2016, respectively). Two groups were analyzed across 3 years: (1) percentage of “engaged” staff physicians versus percentage of outpatient top box scores for physician communication, and (2) percentage of “engaged” staff physicians versus percentage of residents “positive” on program evaluation. For resident evaluation of faculty, the number of programs that met/exceeded ACGME national compliance scores were compared. Univariate chi-squared tests compared data between 2014, 2015, and 2016. Results: For 2014–2016, “engaged” physicians increased from 34% (169/497) to 44% (227/515) to 48% (260/542) (P<0.001) whereas CGCAHPS top box scores for physician communication remained unchanged at 90.9% (22,091/24,302), 90.8% (31,088/34,328), and 90.9% (39,178/43,100) (P=0.869). For the second group, “engaged” physicians increased from 33% (204/617) to 46% (318/692) to 50% (351/701) (P<0.001) and residents “positive” on program evaluation increased from 86% (534/618) in 2014 to 89% (556/624) in 2015 and 89% (550/615) in 2016 (P=0.174). The number of specialties that met/exceeded national compliance for all five faculty evaluation items grew from 44% (11/25) in 2014 to 68% (17/25) in 2015 and 64% (16/25) in 2016 (P=0.182). Conclusion: For our medical group, improvement in physician engagement across time did not coincide with meaningful change in the outpatient experience with physician communication or resident satisfaction with program and faculty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6572657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65726572019-07-26 Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians? Scher, Eric Whitehouse, Sarah Van Harn, Meredith Bollinger, John Stevens, Bret Macki, Kathy Saoud, Deborah Baker-Genaw, Kimberly J Healthc Leadersh Original Research Purpose: This study examined whether change in physician engagement affected outpatient or resident physician satisfaction using common US measures. Methods: Surveys were administered by Advisory Board Survey Solutions for staff physician engagement, Press Ganey for Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CGCAHPS) for outpatient satisfaction, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for the ACGME Resident/Fellow Survey. Survey sample sizes were 685, 697, and 763 for physician engagement and 621, 625, and 618 for resident satisfaction in 2014–2016, respectively; only respondents were available for CGCAHPS (24,302, 34,328, and 43,100 for 2014–2016, respectively). Two groups were analyzed across 3 years: (1) percentage of “engaged” staff physicians versus percentage of outpatient top box scores for physician communication, and (2) percentage of “engaged” staff physicians versus percentage of residents “positive” on program evaluation. For resident evaluation of faculty, the number of programs that met/exceeded ACGME national compliance scores were compared. Univariate chi-squared tests compared data between 2014, 2015, and 2016. Results: For 2014–2016, “engaged” physicians increased from 34% (169/497) to 44% (227/515) to 48% (260/542) (P<0.001) whereas CGCAHPS top box scores for physician communication remained unchanged at 90.9% (22,091/24,302), 90.8% (31,088/34,328), and 90.9% (39,178/43,100) (P=0.869). For the second group, “engaged” physicians increased from 33% (204/617) to 46% (318/692) to 50% (351/701) (P<0.001) and residents “positive” on program evaluation increased from 86% (534/618) in 2014 to 89% (556/624) in 2015 and 89% (550/615) in 2016 (P=0.174). The number of specialties that met/exceeded national compliance for all five faculty evaluation items grew from 44% (11/25) in 2014 to 68% (17/25) in 2015 and 64% (16/25) in 2016 (P=0.182). Conclusion: For our medical group, improvement in physician engagement across time did not coincide with meaningful change in the outpatient experience with physician communication or resident satisfaction with program and faculty. Dove 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6572657/ /pubmed/31354375 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S201060 Text en © 2019 Scher et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Scher, Eric
Whitehouse, Sarah
Van Harn, Meredith
Bollinger, John
Stevens, Bret
Macki, Kathy
Saoud, Deborah
Baker-Genaw, Kimberly
Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
title Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
title_full Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
title_fullStr Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
title_full_unstemmed Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
title_short Does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
title_sort does physician engagement affect satisfaction of patients or resident physicians?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6572657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354375
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S201060
work_keys_str_mv AT schereric doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT whitehousesarah doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT vanharnmeredith doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT bollingerjohn doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT stevensbret doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT mackikathy doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT saouddeborah doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians
AT bakergenawkimberly doesphysicianengagementaffectsatisfactionofpatientsorresidentphysicians