Cargando…

Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality

The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in research and clinical care has expanded dramatically, reflective of an increasing recognition of patient-centeredness as an important aspect of high-quality health care. Given this rapid expansion, ensuring that data collected using PRO measures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Eric M, Gillespie, Erin F, Shaverdian, Narek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354371
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S178344
_version_ 1783427782881050624
author Chang, Eric M
Gillespie, Erin F
Shaverdian, Narek
author_facet Chang, Eric M
Gillespie, Erin F
Shaverdian, Narek
author_sort Chang, Eric M
collection PubMed
description The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in research and clinical care has expanded dramatically, reflective of an increasing recognition of patient-centeredness as an important aspect of high-quality health care. Given this rapid expansion, ensuring that data collected using PRO measures is of high quality is crucial for their continued successful application. Because of the subjective nature of the outcomes assessed, there are many factors that may influence patients’ responses and thus challenge the overall quality of the data. In this review, we discuss the multiple factors that may affect patients’ responses on PRO measures. These factors may arise during instrument development and administration or secondary to patient-level response behaviors. We further examine the relevant literature to delineate how these factors may impact data quality and review methods for accounting for these factors. Consideration of such factors is critical to ensuring data collected truthfully reflects patients’ evaluations and provides accurate conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6573779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65737792019-07-26 Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality Chang, Eric M Gillespie, Erin F Shaverdian, Narek Patient Relat Outcome Meas Review The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in research and clinical care has expanded dramatically, reflective of an increasing recognition of patient-centeredness as an important aspect of high-quality health care. Given this rapid expansion, ensuring that data collected using PRO measures is of high quality is crucial for their continued successful application. Because of the subjective nature of the outcomes assessed, there are many factors that may influence patients’ responses and thus challenge the overall quality of the data. In this review, we discuss the multiple factors that may affect patients’ responses on PRO measures. These factors may arise during instrument development and administration or secondary to patient-level response behaviors. We further examine the relevant literature to delineate how these factors may impact data quality and review methods for accounting for these factors. Consideration of such factors is critical to ensuring data collected truthfully reflects patients’ evaluations and provides accurate conclusions. Dove 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6573779/ /pubmed/31354371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S178344 Text en © 2019 Chang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Chang, Eric M
Gillespie, Erin F
Shaverdian, Narek
Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
title Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
title_full Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
title_fullStr Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
title_full_unstemmed Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
title_short Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
title_sort truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354371
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S178344
work_keys_str_mv AT changericm truthfulnessinpatientreportedoutcomesfactorsaffectingpatientsresponsesandimpactondataquality
AT gillespieerinf truthfulnessinpatientreportedoutcomesfactorsaffectingpatientsresponsesandimpactondataquality
AT shaverdiannarek truthfulnessinpatientreportedoutcomesfactorsaffectingpatientsresponsesandimpactondataquality