Cargando…
Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality
The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in research and clinical care has expanded dramatically, reflective of an increasing recognition of patient-centeredness as an important aspect of high-quality health care. Given this rapid expansion, ensuring that data collected using PRO measures...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S178344 |
_version_ | 1783427782881050624 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Eric M Gillespie, Erin F Shaverdian, Narek |
author_facet | Chang, Eric M Gillespie, Erin F Shaverdian, Narek |
author_sort | Chang, Eric M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in research and clinical care has expanded dramatically, reflective of an increasing recognition of patient-centeredness as an important aspect of high-quality health care. Given this rapid expansion, ensuring that data collected using PRO measures is of high quality is crucial for their continued successful application. Because of the subjective nature of the outcomes assessed, there are many factors that may influence patients’ responses and thus challenge the overall quality of the data. In this review, we discuss the multiple factors that may affect patients’ responses on PRO measures. These factors may arise during instrument development and administration or secondary to patient-level response behaviors. We further examine the relevant literature to delineate how these factors may impact data quality and review methods for accounting for these factors. Consideration of such factors is critical to ensuring data collected truthfully reflects patients’ evaluations and provides accurate conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6573779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65737792019-07-26 Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality Chang, Eric M Gillespie, Erin F Shaverdian, Narek Patient Relat Outcome Meas Review The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in research and clinical care has expanded dramatically, reflective of an increasing recognition of patient-centeredness as an important aspect of high-quality health care. Given this rapid expansion, ensuring that data collected using PRO measures is of high quality is crucial for their continued successful application. Because of the subjective nature of the outcomes assessed, there are many factors that may influence patients’ responses and thus challenge the overall quality of the data. In this review, we discuss the multiple factors that may affect patients’ responses on PRO measures. These factors may arise during instrument development and administration or secondary to patient-level response behaviors. We further examine the relevant literature to delineate how these factors may impact data quality and review methods for accounting for these factors. Consideration of such factors is critical to ensuring data collected truthfully reflects patients’ evaluations and provides accurate conclusions. Dove 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6573779/ /pubmed/31354371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S178344 Text en © 2019 Chang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Chang, Eric M Gillespie, Erin F Shaverdian, Narek Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
title | Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
title_full | Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
title_fullStr | Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
title_short | Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
title_sort | truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354371 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S178344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changericm truthfulnessinpatientreportedoutcomesfactorsaffectingpatientsresponsesandimpactondataquality AT gillespieerinf truthfulnessinpatientreportedoutcomesfactorsaffectingpatientsresponsesandimpactondataquality AT shaverdiannarek truthfulnessinpatientreportedoutcomesfactorsaffectingpatientsresponsesandimpactondataquality |