Cargando…
Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.023 |
_version_ | 1783427785764634624 |
---|---|
author | Levin, Ann Munthali, Spy Vodungbo, Venance Rukhadze, Natia Maitra, Kuhu Ashagari, Tesfaye Brenzel, Logan |
author_facet | Levin, Ann Munthali, Spy Vodungbo, Venance Rukhadze, Natia Maitra, Kuhu Ashagari, Tesfaye Brenzel, Logan |
author_sort | Levin, Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditures for vaccination; and (3) the extent of regulation. METHODS: In each country, the authors surveyed a stratified random sample of 50 private providers (private for-profit and not-for-profit) using a standardized, pre-tested questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. In addition, the authors conducted 300 or more client exit interviews in each country. RESULTS: The three countries had different models of private service provision of vaccination. In Malawi, 44% of private facilities, predominantly faith-based organizations, administered an estimated 27% of all vaccinations. In Benin, 18% of private for-profit and not-for-profit facilities provided vaccinations, accounting for 8% of total vaccinations. In Georgia, all sample facilities were privately managed, and conducted 100% of private vaccinations. In all three countries, the Ministries of Health (MoHs) supplied vaccines and other support to private facilities. The study found that 6–76% of clients paid nominal fees for vaccination cards and services, and a small percentage (2–26%) chose to pay higher fees for vaccines not within their countries’ national schedules. The percentage of private expenditure on vaccination was less than 1% of national health expenditures. The case studies revealed that service quality at private facilities was mixed, a finding that is similar to those of other studies on private sector vaccination. The three countries varied in how well the MoHs managed and supervised private sector services. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The private sector plays a growing role in lower-income countries and is expanding access to services. Governments’ ability to regulate and monitor immunization services and promote quality and affordable services in the private sector should be a priority. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6573791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65737912019-08-07 Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia Levin, Ann Munthali, Spy Vodungbo, Venance Rukhadze, Natia Maitra, Kuhu Ashagari, Tesfaye Brenzel, Logan Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditures for vaccination; and (3) the extent of regulation. METHODS: In each country, the authors surveyed a stratified random sample of 50 private providers (private for-profit and not-for-profit) using a standardized, pre-tested questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. In addition, the authors conducted 300 or more client exit interviews in each country. RESULTS: The three countries had different models of private service provision of vaccination. In Malawi, 44% of private facilities, predominantly faith-based organizations, administered an estimated 27% of all vaccinations. In Benin, 18% of private for-profit and not-for-profit facilities provided vaccinations, accounting for 8% of total vaccinations. In Georgia, all sample facilities were privately managed, and conducted 100% of private vaccinations. In all three countries, the Ministries of Health (MoHs) supplied vaccines and other support to private facilities. The study found that 6–76% of clients paid nominal fees for vaccination cards and services, and a small percentage (2–26%) chose to pay higher fees for vaccines not within their countries’ national schedules. The percentage of private expenditure on vaccination was less than 1% of national health expenditures. The case studies revealed that service quality at private facilities was mixed, a finding that is similar to those of other studies on private sector vaccination. The three countries varied in how well the MoHs managed and supervised private sector services. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The private sector plays a growing role in lower-income countries and is expanding access to services. Governments’ ability to regulate and monitor immunization services and promote quality and affordable services in the private sector should be a priority. Elsevier Science 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6573791/ /pubmed/31122855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.023 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Levin, Ann Munthali, Spy Vodungbo, Venance Rukhadze, Natia Maitra, Kuhu Ashagari, Tesfaye Brenzel, Logan Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia |
title | Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia |
title_full | Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia |
title_fullStr | Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia |
title_full_unstemmed | Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia |
title_short | Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia |
title_sort | scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in benin, malawi and georgia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levinann scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia AT munthalispy scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia AT vodungbovenance scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia AT rukhadzenatia scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia AT maitrakuhu scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia AT ashagaritesfaye scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia AT brenzellogan scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia |