Cargando…

Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levin, Ann, Munthali, Spy, Vodungbo, Venance, Rukhadze, Natia, Maitra, Kuhu, Ashagari, Tesfaye, Brenzel, Logan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.023
_version_ 1783427785764634624
author Levin, Ann
Munthali, Spy
Vodungbo, Venance
Rukhadze, Natia
Maitra, Kuhu
Ashagari, Tesfaye
Brenzel, Logan
author_facet Levin, Ann
Munthali, Spy
Vodungbo, Venance
Rukhadze, Natia
Maitra, Kuhu
Ashagari, Tesfaye
Brenzel, Logan
author_sort Levin, Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditures for vaccination; and (3) the extent of regulation. METHODS: In each country, the authors surveyed a stratified random sample of 50 private providers (private for-profit and not-for-profit) using a standardized, pre-tested questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. In addition, the authors conducted 300 or more client exit interviews in each country. RESULTS: The three countries had different models of private service provision of vaccination. In Malawi, 44% of private facilities, predominantly faith-based organizations, administered an estimated 27% of all vaccinations. In Benin, 18% of private for-profit and not-for-profit facilities provided vaccinations, accounting for 8% of total vaccinations. In Georgia, all sample facilities were privately managed, and conducted 100% of private vaccinations. In all three countries, the Ministries of Health (MoHs) supplied vaccines and other support to private facilities. The study found that 6–76% of clients paid nominal fees for vaccination cards and services, and a small percentage (2–26%) chose to pay higher fees for vaccines not within their countries’ national schedules. The percentage of private expenditure on vaccination was less than 1% of national health expenditures. The case studies revealed that service quality at private facilities was mixed, a finding that is similar to those of other studies on private sector vaccination. The three countries varied in how well the MoHs managed and supervised private sector services. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The private sector plays a growing role in lower-income countries and is expanding access to services. Governments’ ability to regulate and monitor immunization services and promote quality and affordable services in the private sector should be a priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6573791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65737912019-08-07 Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia Levin, Ann Munthali, Spy Vodungbo, Venance Rukhadze, Natia Maitra, Kuhu Ashagari, Tesfaye Brenzel, Logan Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of private sector providers in providing and financing immunization. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a study in Benin, Malawi, and Georgia to estimate (1) the proportion of vaccinations taking place through the private sector; (2) private expenditures for vaccination; and (3) the extent of regulation. METHODS: In each country, the authors surveyed a stratified random sample of 50 private providers (private for-profit and not-for-profit) using a standardized, pre-tested questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. In addition, the authors conducted 300 or more client exit interviews in each country. RESULTS: The three countries had different models of private service provision of vaccination. In Malawi, 44% of private facilities, predominantly faith-based organizations, administered an estimated 27% of all vaccinations. In Benin, 18% of private for-profit and not-for-profit facilities provided vaccinations, accounting for 8% of total vaccinations. In Georgia, all sample facilities were privately managed, and conducted 100% of private vaccinations. In all three countries, the Ministries of Health (MoHs) supplied vaccines and other support to private facilities. The study found that 6–76% of clients paid nominal fees for vaccination cards and services, and a small percentage (2–26%) chose to pay higher fees for vaccines not within their countries’ national schedules. The percentage of private expenditure on vaccination was less than 1% of national health expenditures. The case studies revealed that service quality at private facilities was mixed, a finding that is similar to those of other studies on private sector vaccination. The three countries varied in how well the MoHs managed and supervised private sector services. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The private sector plays a growing role in lower-income countries and is expanding access to services. Governments’ ability to regulate and monitor immunization services and promote quality and affordable services in the private sector should be a priority. Elsevier Science 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6573791/ /pubmed/31122855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.023 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Levin, Ann
Munthali, Spy
Vodungbo, Venance
Rukhadze, Natia
Maitra, Kuhu
Ashagari, Tesfaye
Brenzel, Logan
Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
title Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
title_full Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
title_fullStr Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
title_full_unstemmed Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
title_short Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia
title_sort scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in benin, malawi and georgia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31122855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.023
work_keys_str_mv AT levinann scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia
AT munthalispy scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia
AT vodungbovenance scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia
AT rukhadzenatia scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia
AT maitrakuhu scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia
AT ashagaritesfaye scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia
AT brenzellogan scopeandmagnitudeofprivatesectorfinancingandprovisionofimmunizationinbeninmalawiandgeorgia