Cargando…

Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND: Coccidioidomycosis (CM) infections among transplant recipients result in significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of our study was to establish the efficacy of low dose (LD) versus standard dose (LD, 50 mg daily) fluconazole in preventing CM infection. METHODS: This was a retrospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habib, Shahid, El Ramahi, Razan A., Rosen, Scott, Farran, Sumaya, Shubeilat, Jamilah, Walker, Courtney, Casal, Mariana, Zangeneh, Tirdad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6575139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236156
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1182
_version_ 1783427801168216064
author Habib, Shahid
El Ramahi, Razan A.
Rosen, Scott
Farran, Sumaya
Shubeilat, Jamilah
Walker, Courtney
Casal, Mariana
Zangeneh, Tirdad
author_facet Habib, Shahid
El Ramahi, Razan A.
Rosen, Scott
Farran, Sumaya
Shubeilat, Jamilah
Walker, Courtney
Casal, Mariana
Zangeneh, Tirdad
author_sort Habib, Shahid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coccidioidomycosis (CM) infections among transplant recipients result in significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of our study was to establish the efficacy of low dose (LD) versus standard dose (LD, 50 mg daily) fluconazole in preventing CM infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective study utilizing electronic medical records of liver transplant recipients at the University of Arizona. The primary end point was post-transplant CM status, such as infection, complications and survival. RESULTS: We detected a statistically significant correlation between positive pre-transplant status and positive post-transplant status (hazards ratio: 8.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.028 - 66.192)). There was a trend towards improved survival in patients who had a positive post-transplant CM status in the SD group versus LD group (90.9% versus 81.3%), although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The risk of CM infection among transplant recipients in the absence of prophylaxis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We currently use SD fluconazole as universal prophylaxis in all transplant recipients despite not establishing statistical significance between LD and SD. We believe that the survival trend detected may have not reached statistical significance due to low power impact. Since the standardization of SD prophylaxis at our institution, we have not diagnosed further new post-transplant CM infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6575139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65751392019-06-24 Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients Habib, Shahid El Ramahi, Razan A. Rosen, Scott Farran, Sumaya Shubeilat, Jamilah Walker, Courtney Casal, Mariana Zangeneh, Tirdad Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Coccidioidomycosis (CM) infections among transplant recipients result in significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of our study was to establish the efficacy of low dose (LD) versus standard dose (LD, 50 mg daily) fluconazole in preventing CM infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective study utilizing electronic medical records of liver transplant recipients at the University of Arizona. The primary end point was post-transplant CM status, such as infection, complications and survival. RESULTS: We detected a statistically significant correlation between positive pre-transplant status and positive post-transplant status (hazards ratio: 8.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.028 - 66.192)). There was a trend towards improved survival in patients who had a positive post-transplant CM status in the SD group versus LD group (90.9% versus 81.3%), although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The risk of CM infection among transplant recipients in the absence of prophylaxis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We currently use SD fluconazole as universal prophylaxis in all transplant recipients despite not establishing statistical significance between LD and SD. We believe that the survival trend detected may have not reached statistical significance due to low power impact. Since the standardization of SD prophylaxis at our institution, we have not diagnosed further new post-transplant CM infections. Elmer Press 2019-06 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6575139/ /pubmed/31236156 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1182 Text en Copyright 2019, Habib et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Habib, Shahid
El Ramahi, Razan A.
Rosen, Scott
Farran, Sumaya
Shubeilat, Jamilah
Walker, Courtney
Casal, Mariana
Zangeneh, Tirdad
Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
title Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
title_full Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
title_fullStr Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
title_short Efficacy of Low Dose Chemoprophylaxis for Coccidioidomycosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients
title_sort efficacy of low dose chemoprophylaxis for coccidioidomycosis infection in liver transplant recipients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6575139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236156
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1182
work_keys_str_mv AT habibshahid efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT elramahirazana efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT rosenscott efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT farransumaya efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT shubeilatjamilah efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT walkercourtney efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT casalmariana efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients
AT zangenehtirdad efficacyoflowdosechemoprophylaxisforcoccidioidomycosisinfectioninlivertransplantrecipients