Cargando…

NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) offers potential cure for localised prostate cancer but is associated with considerable toxicity. Potency and urinary continence are improved when the neurovascular bundles (NVBs) are spared during a nerve spare (NS) RALP. There is reluc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinneen, Eoin, Haider, Aiman, Allen, Clare, Freeman, Alex, Briggs, Tim, Nathan, Senthil, Brew-Graves, Chris, Grierson, Jack, Williams, Norman R, Persad, Raj, Oakley, Neil, Adshead, Jim M, Huland, Hartwig, Haese, Alexander, Shaw, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6575674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31189680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028132
_version_ 1783427812455088128
author Dinneen, Eoin
Haider, Aiman
Allen, Clare
Freeman, Alex
Briggs, Tim
Nathan, Senthil
Brew-Graves, Chris
Grierson, Jack
Williams, Norman R
Persad, Raj
Oakley, Neil
Adshead, Jim M
Huland, Hartwig
Haese, Alexander
Shaw, Greg
author_facet Dinneen, Eoin
Haider, Aiman
Allen, Clare
Freeman, Alex
Briggs, Tim
Nathan, Senthil
Brew-Graves, Chris
Grierson, Jack
Williams, Norman R
Persad, Raj
Oakley, Neil
Adshead, Jim M
Huland, Hartwig
Haese, Alexander
Shaw, Greg
author_sort Dinneen, Eoin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) offers potential cure for localised prostate cancer but is associated with considerable toxicity. Potency and urinary continence are improved when the neurovascular bundles (NVBs) are spared during a nerve spare (NS) RALP. There is reluctance, however, to perform NS RALP when there are concerns that the cancer extends beyond the capsule of the prostate into the NVB, as NS RALP in this instance increases the risk of a positive surgical margin (PSM). The NeuroSAFE technique involves intraoperative fresh-frozen section analysis of the posterolateral aspect of the prostate margin to assess whether cancer extends beyond the capsule. There is evidence from large observational studies that functional outcomes can be improved and PSM rates reduced when the NeuroSAFE technique is used during RALP. To date, however, there has been no randomised controlled trial (RCT) to substantiate this finding. The NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility study is designed to assess whether it is feasible to randomise men to NeuroSAFE RALP versus a control arm of ‘standard of practice’ RALP. METHODS: NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility study will be a multicentre, single-blinded RCT with patients randomised 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RALP (intervention) or standard RALP (control). Treatment allocation will occur after trial entry and consent. The primary outcome will be assessed as the successful accrual of 50 men at three sites over 15 months. Secondary outcomes will be used to aid subsequent power calculations for the definitive full-scale RCT and will include rates of NS; PSM; biochemical recurrence; adjuvant treatments; and patient-reported functional outcomes on potency, continence and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: NeuroSAFE PROOF has ethical approval (Regional Ethics Committee reference 17/LO/1978). NeuroSAFE PROOF is supported by National Institute for Healthcare Research Research for Patient Benefit funding (NIHR reference PB-PG-1216-20013). Findings will be made available through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03317990.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6575674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65756742019-07-02 NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study Dinneen, Eoin Haider, Aiman Allen, Clare Freeman, Alex Briggs, Tim Nathan, Senthil Brew-Graves, Chris Grierson, Jack Williams, Norman R Persad, Raj Oakley, Neil Adshead, Jim M Huland, Hartwig Haese, Alexander Shaw, Greg BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) offers potential cure for localised prostate cancer but is associated with considerable toxicity. Potency and urinary continence are improved when the neurovascular bundles (NVBs) are spared during a nerve spare (NS) RALP. There is reluctance, however, to perform NS RALP when there are concerns that the cancer extends beyond the capsule of the prostate into the NVB, as NS RALP in this instance increases the risk of a positive surgical margin (PSM). The NeuroSAFE technique involves intraoperative fresh-frozen section analysis of the posterolateral aspect of the prostate margin to assess whether cancer extends beyond the capsule. There is evidence from large observational studies that functional outcomes can be improved and PSM rates reduced when the NeuroSAFE technique is used during RALP. To date, however, there has been no randomised controlled trial (RCT) to substantiate this finding. The NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility study is designed to assess whether it is feasible to randomise men to NeuroSAFE RALP versus a control arm of ‘standard of practice’ RALP. METHODS: NeuroSAFE PROOF feasibility study will be a multicentre, single-blinded RCT with patients randomised 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RALP (intervention) or standard RALP (control). Treatment allocation will occur after trial entry and consent. The primary outcome will be assessed as the successful accrual of 50 men at three sites over 15 months. Secondary outcomes will be used to aid subsequent power calculations for the definitive full-scale RCT and will include rates of NS; PSM; biochemical recurrence; adjuvant treatments; and patient-reported functional outcomes on potency, continence and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: NeuroSAFE PROOF has ethical approval (Regional Ethics Committee reference 17/LO/1978). NeuroSAFE PROOF is supported by National Institute for Healthcare Research Research for Patient Benefit funding (NIHR reference PB-PG-1216-20013). Findings will be made available through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03317990. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6575674/ /pubmed/31189680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028132 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Urology
Dinneen, Eoin
Haider, Aiman
Allen, Clare
Freeman, Alex
Briggs, Tim
Nathan, Senthil
Brew-Graves, Chris
Grierson, Jack
Williams, Norman R
Persad, Raj
Oakley, Neil
Adshead, Jim M
Huland, Hartwig
Haese, Alexander
Shaw, Greg
NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
title NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
title_full NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
title_fullStr NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
title_short NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
title_sort neurosafe robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (neurosafe proof): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6575674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31189680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028132
work_keys_str_mv AT dinneeneoin neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT haideraiman neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT allenclare neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT freemanalex neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT briggstim neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT nathansenthil neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT brewgraveschris neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT griersonjack neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT williamsnormanr neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT persadraj neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT oakleyneil neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT adsheadjimm neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT hulandhartwig neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT haesealexander neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy
AT shawgreg neurosaferobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyversusstandardrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomyformenwithlocalisedprostatecancerneurosafeproofprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitystudy