Cargando…

Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our review was to systematically assess available evidence on the effectiveness, safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force (CF) catheter (THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter (ST)) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macle, Laurent, Frame, Diana, Gache, Larry M, Monir, George, Pollak, Scott J, Boo, Lee Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6575819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31189669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023775
_version_ 1783427814548045824
author Macle, Laurent
Frame, Diana
Gache, Larry M
Monir, George
Pollak, Scott J
Boo, Lee Ming
author_facet Macle, Laurent
Frame, Diana
Gache, Larry M
Monir, George
Pollak, Scott J
Boo, Lee Ming
author_sort Macle, Laurent
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of our review was to systematically assess available evidence on the effectiveness, safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force (CF) catheter (THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter (ST)) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with other ablation catheters, or with the ST with the operator blinded to CF data. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes of AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters; however, reviews to date have included data from multiple, distinct CF technologies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing the use of ST versus other ablation catheters for the treatment of AF. A comprehensive search of electronic and manual sources was conducted. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) at 12 months. Procedural and safety data were also analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies enrolling 5004 patients were eligible. The use of ST was associated with increased odds of freedom from AT at 12 months (71.0%vs60.8%; OR 1.454, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.88, p=0.004) over the comparator group, and the effect size was most evident in paroxysmal AF patients (75.6%vs64.7%; OR 1.560, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.24, p=0.015). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were shorter with ST (p=0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, vs comparator groups). The reduction in procedure time is estimated at 15.5 min (9.0%), and fluoroscopy time 4.8 min (18.7%). Complication rates, including cardiac tamponade, did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of other catheters, AF ablation using the CF-sensing ST catheter for AF is associated with improved success rates, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and similar safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6575819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65758192019-07-02 Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis Macle, Laurent Frame, Diana Gache, Larry M Monir, George Pollak, Scott J Boo, Lee Ming BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: The objective of our review was to systematically assess available evidence on the effectiveness, safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force (CF) catheter (THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter (ST)) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with other ablation catheters, or with the ST with the operator blinded to CF data. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes of AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters; however, reviews to date have included data from multiple, distinct CF technologies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing the use of ST versus other ablation catheters for the treatment of AF. A comprehensive search of electronic and manual sources was conducted. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) at 12 months. Procedural and safety data were also analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies enrolling 5004 patients were eligible. The use of ST was associated with increased odds of freedom from AT at 12 months (71.0%vs60.8%; OR 1.454, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.88, p=0.004) over the comparator group, and the effect size was most evident in paroxysmal AF patients (75.6%vs64.7%; OR 1.560, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.24, p=0.015). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were shorter with ST (p=0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, vs comparator groups). The reduction in procedure time is estimated at 15.5 min (9.0%), and fluoroscopy time 4.8 min (18.7%). Complication rates, including cardiac tamponade, did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of other catheters, AF ablation using the CF-sensing ST catheter for AF is associated with improved success rates, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and similar safety profile. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6575819/ /pubmed/31189669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023775 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Macle, Laurent
Frame, Diana
Gache, Larry M
Monir, George
Pollak, Scott J
Boo, Lee Ming
Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_short Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_sort atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6575819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31189669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023775
work_keys_str_mv AT maclelaurent atrialfibrillationablationwithaspringsensorirrigatedcontactforcesensingcathetercomparedwithotherablationcatheterssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT framediana atrialfibrillationablationwithaspringsensorirrigatedcontactforcesensingcathetercomparedwithotherablationcatheterssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT gachelarrym atrialfibrillationablationwithaspringsensorirrigatedcontactforcesensingcathetercomparedwithotherablationcatheterssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT monirgeorge atrialfibrillationablationwithaspringsensorirrigatedcontactforcesensingcathetercomparedwithotherablationcatheterssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT pollakscottj atrialfibrillationablationwithaspringsensorirrigatedcontactforcesensingcathetercomparedwithotherablationcatheterssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT booleeming atrialfibrillationablationwithaspringsensorirrigatedcontactforcesensingcathetercomparedwithotherablationcatheterssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis