Cargando…

Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats

INTRODUCTION: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been widely used for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Rodent animals including mice and rats are often used to investigate the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms for the therapeutic effects of repetitive t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chengliang, Lu, Rulan, Wang, Linxiao, Yun, Wenwei, Zhou, Xianju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6576213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1305
_version_ 1783427832794316800
author Zhang, Chengliang
Lu, Rulan
Wang, Linxiao
Yun, Wenwei
Zhou, Xianju
author_facet Zhang, Chengliang
Lu, Rulan
Wang, Linxiao
Yun, Wenwei
Zhou, Xianju
author_sort Zhang, Chengliang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been widely used for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Rodent animals including mice and rats are often used to investigate the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. So far there is no report about an easy‐to‐use device to restrain rodent animals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We introduced the design and use of the restraint device for mice or rats. In the mouse device, western blot and real‐time PCR analysis showed that,in stimulated mouse frontal cortex, 10 Hz high frequency stimulation for 10 sessions resulted in enhanced expression of NR2B‐containing N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid receptors and reduced α1 subunit of inhibitory GABA(A) receptors, whereas 0.5 Hz low frequency stimulation for 10 sessions caused decreased expression of NR2B subunit and increased α1 subunit of GABA(A) receptors. In the rat device, measures of motor evoke potentials indicated that 10 Hz stimulation for 10 sessions increased the excitability of stimulated cortex, whereas 0.5 Hz for 10 sessions reduced it. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested the effectiveness of the devices. Thus, the two devices are practical and easy‐to‐use to investigate the mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6576213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65762132019-06-20 Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats Zhang, Chengliang Lu, Rulan Wang, Linxiao Yun, Wenwei Zhou, Xianju Brain Behav Methods INTRODUCTION: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been widely used for the treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Rodent animals including mice and rats are often used to investigate the potential cellular and molecular mechanisms for the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. So far there is no report about an easy‐to‐use device to restrain rodent animals for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We introduced the design and use of the restraint device for mice or rats. In the mouse device, western blot and real‐time PCR analysis showed that,in stimulated mouse frontal cortex, 10 Hz high frequency stimulation for 10 sessions resulted in enhanced expression of NR2B‐containing N‐methyl‐D‐aspartic acid receptors and reduced α1 subunit of inhibitory GABA(A) receptors, whereas 0.5 Hz low frequency stimulation for 10 sessions caused decreased expression of NR2B subunit and increased α1 subunit of GABA(A) receptors. In the rat device, measures of motor evoke potentials indicated that 10 Hz stimulation for 10 sessions increased the excitability of stimulated cortex, whereas 0.5 Hz for 10 sessions reduced it. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested the effectiveness of the devices. Thus, the two devices are practical and easy‐to‐use to investigate the mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6576213/ /pubmed/31033242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1305 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Zhang, Chengliang
Lu, Rulan
Wang, Linxiao
Yun, Wenwei
Zhou, Xianju
Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
title Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
title_full Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
title_fullStr Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
title_full_unstemmed Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
title_short Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
title_sort restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6576213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1305
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchengliang restraintdevicesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinmiceandrats
AT lurulan restraintdevicesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinmiceandrats
AT wanglinxiao restraintdevicesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinmiceandrats
AT yunwenwei restraintdevicesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinmiceandrats
AT zhouxianju restraintdevicesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinmiceandrats