Cargando…
Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies
OBJECTIVE: Clear information is essential to properly determine preference in medical intervention. In neovascular age-related macular degeneration, patients need to understand the balance of risk and benefit of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. This balance is altered by the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000257 |
_version_ | 1783427880420638720 |
---|---|
author | Clearkin, Louis Ramasamy, Balasubramanian Wason, James Tiew, Stephenie |
author_facet | Clearkin, Louis Ramasamy, Balasubramanian Wason, James Tiew, Stephenie |
author_sort | Clearkin, Louis |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Clear information is essential to properly determine preference in medical intervention. In neovascular age-related macular degeneration, patients need to understand the balance of risk and benefit of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. This balance is altered by the number of injections administered. METHODS: Natural frequencies, displayed as pictographically as icon arrays, are used to show material outcomes from the MARINA and HARBOR (12 months) trials. We also calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). RESULTS: MARINA 24-month data show the absolute risk reduction is 37% and the NNT is 3; meaning for one patient to benefit three need to be treated. 12 months’ HARBOR data show that compared with as-needed treatment, scheduled monthly injection treatment increases the number of patients achieving a better visual outcome. The number of patients suffering harm is also increased by the additional injections. CONCLUSION: Displaying MARINA and HARBOR trial data as natural frequencies, with numbers needed to treat and harm, communicates complimentary information on the positive and negative aspects of anti-VEGF treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6579561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65795612019-07-02 Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies Clearkin, Louis Ramasamy, Balasubramanian Wason, James Tiew, Stephenie BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Clear information is essential to properly determine preference in medical intervention. In neovascular age-related macular degeneration, patients need to understand the balance of risk and benefit of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. This balance is altered by the number of injections administered. METHODS: Natural frequencies, displayed as pictographically as icon arrays, are used to show material outcomes from the MARINA and HARBOR (12 months) trials. We also calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). RESULTS: MARINA 24-month data show the absolute risk reduction is 37% and the NNT is 3; meaning for one patient to benefit three need to be treated. 12 months’ HARBOR data show that compared with as-needed treatment, scheduled monthly injection treatment increases the number of patients achieving a better visual outcome. The number of patients suffering harm is also increased by the additional injections. CONCLUSION: Displaying MARINA and HARBOR trial data as natural frequencies, with numbers needed to treat and harm, communicates complimentary information on the positive and negative aspects of anti-VEGF treatment. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6579561/ /pubmed/31276032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000257 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Clearkin, Louis Ramasamy, Balasubramanian Wason, James Tiew, Stephenie Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
title | Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
title_full | Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
title_fullStr | Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
title_full_unstemmed | Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
title_short | Anti-VEGF intervention in neovascular AMD: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
title_sort | anti-vegf intervention in neovascular amd: benefits and risks restated as natural frequencies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31276032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clearkinlouis antivegfinterventioninneovascularamdbenefitsandrisksrestatedasnaturalfrequencies AT ramasamybalasubramanian antivegfinterventioninneovascularamdbenefitsandrisksrestatedasnaturalfrequencies AT wasonjames antivegfinterventioninneovascularamdbenefitsandrisksrestatedasnaturalfrequencies AT tiewstephenie antivegfinterventioninneovascularamdbenefitsandrisksrestatedasnaturalfrequencies |