Cargando…

Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services

BACKGROUND: Many health sciences librarians are noticing an increase in demand for systematic review support. Developing a strategic approach to supporting systematic review activities can address commonly reported barriers and challenges including time factors, methodological issues, and supporting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKeown, Sandra, Ross-White, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Library Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258447
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443
_version_ 1783427886457290752
author McKeown, Sandra
Ross-White, Amanda
author_facet McKeown, Sandra
Ross-White, Amanda
author_sort McKeown, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many health sciences librarians are noticing an increase in demand for systematic review support. Developing a strategic approach to supporting systematic review activities can address commonly reported barriers and challenges including time factors, methodological issues, and supporting student-led projects. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes how a health sciences library at a mid-sized university developed and implemented a structured and defined systematic review service in order to build capacity for increased librarian support and to maximize librarians’ time and expertise. The process also revealed underlying collaboration challenges related to student-led systematic reviews and research quality concerns that needed to be addressed. The steps for developing a formal service included defining the librarian’s role and a library service model, building librarian expertise, developing documentation to guide librarians and patrons, piloting and revising the service model, marketing and promoting the service, and evaluating service usage. CONCLUSIONS: The two-tiered service model developed for advisory consultation and collaboration provides a framework for supporting systematic review activities that other libraries can adapt to meet their own needs. Librarian autonomy in deciding whether to collaborate on reviews based on defined and explicit considerations was crucial for maximizing librarians’ time and expertise and for promoting higher quality research. Monitoring service usage will be imperative for managing existing and future librarian workload. These data and tracking of research outputs from librarian collaborations may also be used to advocate for new librarian positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6579587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medical Library Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65795872019-07-01 Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services McKeown, Sandra Ross-White, Amanda J Med Libr Assoc Case Report BACKGROUND: Many health sciences librarians are noticing an increase in demand for systematic review support. Developing a strategic approach to supporting systematic review activities can address commonly reported barriers and challenges including time factors, methodological issues, and supporting student-led projects. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes how a health sciences library at a mid-sized university developed and implemented a structured and defined systematic review service in order to build capacity for increased librarian support and to maximize librarians’ time and expertise. The process also revealed underlying collaboration challenges related to student-led systematic reviews and research quality concerns that needed to be addressed. The steps for developing a formal service included defining the librarian’s role and a library service model, building librarian expertise, developing documentation to guide librarians and patrons, piloting and revising the service model, marketing and promoting the service, and evaluating service usage. CONCLUSIONS: The two-tiered service model developed for advisory consultation and collaboration provides a framework for supporting systematic review activities that other libraries can adapt to meet their own needs. Librarian autonomy in deciding whether to collaborate on reviews based on defined and explicit considerations was crucial for maximizing librarians’ time and expertise and for promoting higher quality research. Monitoring service usage will be imperative for managing existing and future librarian workload. These data and tracking of research outputs from librarian collaborations may also be used to advocate for new librarian positions. Medical Library Association 2019-07 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6579587/ /pubmed/31258447 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443 Text en Copyright: © 2019, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Report
McKeown, Sandra
Ross-White, Amanda
Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
title Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
title_full Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
title_fullStr Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
title_full_unstemmed Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
title_short Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
title_sort building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258447
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443
work_keys_str_mv AT mckeownsandra buildingcapacityforlibrariansupportandaddressingcollaborationchallengesbyformalizinglibrarysystematicreviewservices
AT rosswhiteamanda buildingcapacityforlibrariansupportandaddressingcollaborationchallengesbyformalizinglibrarysystematicreviewservices