Cargando…

Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework

PURPOSE: Gene-disease associations implicated in hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility were evaluated using the ClinGen Clinical Validity framework. METHODS: Forty-two gene-disease pairs were assessed for strength of evidence supporting an association with hereditary colorectal c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifert, Bryce A., McGlaughon, Jennifer L., Jackson, Sarah A., Ritter, Deborah I, Roberts, Maegan E., Schmidt, Ryan J., Thompson, Bryony A., Jimenez, Sharisse, Trapp, Mackenzie, Lee, Kristy, Plon, Sharon E., Offit, Kenneth, Stadler, Zsofia K., Zhang, Liying, Greenblatt, Marc S., Ferber, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30523343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0373-1
_version_ 1783427891521912832
author Seifert, Bryce A.
McGlaughon, Jennifer L.
Jackson, Sarah A.
Ritter, Deborah I
Roberts, Maegan E.
Schmidt, Ryan J.
Thompson, Bryony A.
Jimenez, Sharisse
Trapp, Mackenzie
Lee, Kristy
Plon, Sharon E.
Offit, Kenneth
Stadler, Zsofia K.
Zhang, Liying
Greenblatt, Marc S.
Ferber, Matthew J.
author_facet Seifert, Bryce A.
McGlaughon, Jennifer L.
Jackson, Sarah A.
Ritter, Deborah I
Roberts, Maegan E.
Schmidt, Ryan J.
Thompson, Bryony A.
Jimenez, Sharisse
Trapp, Mackenzie
Lee, Kristy
Plon, Sharon E.
Offit, Kenneth
Stadler, Zsofia K.
Zhang, Liying
Greenblatt, Marc S.
Ferber, Matthew J.
author_sort Seifert, Bryce A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Gene-disease associations implicated in hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility were evaluated using the ClinGen Clinical Validity framework. METHODS: Forty-two gene-disease pairs were assessed for strength of evidence supporting an association with hereditary colorectal cancer and/or polyposis. Genetic and experimental evidence supporting each gene-disease relationship was curated independently by two trained biocurators. Evidence was reviewed with experts and assigned a final clinical validity classification. RESULTS: Of all gene-disease pairs evaluated, 14/42 (33.3%) were Definitive, 1/42 (2.4%) were Strong, 6/42 (14.3%) were Moderate, 18/42 (42.9%) were Limited, and 3/42 (7.1%) were either No Reported Evidence, Disputed, or Refuted. Of panels in the NIH Genetic Testing Registry, 4/26 (~15.4%) contain genes with Limited clinical evidence. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and laboratory diagnosticians should note that <60% of the genes on clinically available panels have Strong or Definitive evidence of association with hereditary colon cancer or polyposis, and >40% have only Moderate, Limited, Disputed, or Refuted evidence. Continuing to expand the structured assessment of the clinical relevance of genes listed on hereditary cancer testing panels will help clinicians and diagnostic laboratories focus the communication of genetic testing results on clinically significant genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6579719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65797192019-07-05 Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework Seifert, Bryce A. McGlaughon, Jennifer L. Jackson, Sarah A. Ritter, Deborah I Roberts, Maegan E. Schmidt, Ryan J. Thompson, Bryony A. Jimenez, Sharisse Trapp, Mackenzie Lee, Kristy Plon, Sharon E. Offit, Kenneth Stadler, Zsofia K. Zhang, Liying Greenblatt, Marc S. Ferber, Matthew J. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Gene-disease associations implicated in hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility were evaluated using the ClinGen Clinical Validity framework. METHODS: Forty-two gene-disease pairs were assessed for strength of evidence supporting an association with hereditary colorectal cancer and/or polyposis. Genetic and experimental evidence supporting each gene-disease relationship was curated independently by two trained biocurators. Evidence was reviewed with experts and assigned a final clinical validity classification. RESULTS: Of all gene-disease pairs evaluated, 14/42 (33.3%) were Definitive, 1/42 (2.4%) were Strong, 6/42 (14.3%) were Moderate, 18/42 (42.9%) were Limited, and 3/42 (7.1%) were either No Reported Evidence, Disputed, or Refuted. Of panels in the NIH Genetic Testing Registry, 4/26 (~15.4%) contain genes with Limited clinical evidence. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and laboratory diagnosticians should note that <60% of the genes on clinically available panels have Strong or Definitive evidence of association with hereditary colon cancer or polyposis, and >40% have only Moderate, Limited, Disputed, or Refuted evidence. Continuing to expand the structured assessment of the clinical relevance of genes listed on hereditary cancer testing panels will help clinicians and diagnostic laboratories focus the communication of genetic testing results on clinically significant genes. 2018-12-07 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6579719/ /pubmed/30523343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0373-1 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Seifert, Bryce A.
McGlaughon, Jennifer L.
Jackson, Sarah A.
Ritter, Deborah I
Roberts, Maegan E.
Schmidt, Ryan J.
Thompson, Bryony A.
Jimenez, Sharisse
Trapp, Mackenzie
Lee, Kristy
Plon, Sharon E.
Offit, Kenneth
Stadler, Zsofia K.
Zhang, Liying
Greenblatt, Marc S.
Ferber, Matthew J.
Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework
title Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework
title_full Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework
title_fullStr Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework
title_full_unstemmed Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework
title_short Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework
title_sort determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the clinical genome resource clinical validity framework
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30523343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0373-1
work_keys_str_mv AT seifertbrycea determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT mcglaughonjenniferl determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT jacksonsaraha determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT ritterdeborahi determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT robertsmaegane determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT schmidtryanj determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT thompsonbryonya determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT jimenezsharisse determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT trappmackenzie determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT leekristy determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT plonsharone determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT offitkenneth determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT stadlerzsofiak determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT zhangliying determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT greenblattmarcs determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework
AT ferbermatthewj determiningtheclinicalvalidityofhereditarycolorectalcancerandpolyposissusceptibilitygenesusingtheclinicalgenomeresourceclinicalvalidityframework