Cargando…

Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident

The first peopling of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and the Aru Islands joined at lower sea levels) by anatomically modern humans required multiple maritime crossings through Wallacea, with at least one approaching 100 km. Whether these crossings were accidental or intentional is unknown. Using coast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bird, Michael I., Condie, Scott A., O’Connor, Sue, O’Grady, Damien, Reepmeyer, Christian, Ulm, Sean, Zega, Mojca, Saltré, Frédérik, Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9
_version_ 1783427896353751040
author Bird, Michael I.
Condie, Scott A.
O’Connor, Sue
O’Grady, Damien
Reepmeyer, Christian
Ulm, Sean
Zega, Mojca
Saltré, Frédérik
Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
author_facet Bird, Michael I.
Condie, Scott A.
O’Connor, Sue
O’Grady, Damien
Reepmeyer, Christian
Ulm, Sean
Zega, Mojca
Saltré, Frédérik
Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
author_sort Bird, Michael I.
collection PubMed
description The first peopling of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and the Aru Islands joined at lower sea levels) by anatomically modern humans required multiple maritime crossings through Wallacea, with at least one approaching 100 km. Whether these crossings were accidental or intentional is unknown. Using coastal-viewshed analysis and ocean drift modelling combined with population projections, we show that the probability of randomly reaching Sahul by any route is <5% until ≥40 adults are ‘washed off’ an island at least once every 20 years. We then demonstrate that choosing a time of departure and making minimal headway (0.5 knots) toward a destination greatly increases the likelihood of arrival. While drift modelling demonstrates the existence of ‘bottleneck’ crossings on all routes, arrival via New Guinea is more likely than via northwestern Australia. We conclude that anatomically modern humans had the capacity to plan and make open-sea voyages lasting several days by at least 50,000 years ago.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6579762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65797622019-06-24 Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident Bird, Michael I. Condie, Scott A. O’Connor, Sue O’Grady, Damien Reepmeyer, Christian Ulm, Sean Zega, Mojca Saltré, Frédérik Bradshaw, Corey J. A. Sci Rep Article The first peopling of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and the Aru Islands joined at lower sea levels) by anatomically modern humans required multiple maritime crossings through Wallacea, with at least one approaching 100 km. Whether these crossings were accidental or intentional is unknown. Using coastal-viewshed analysis and ocean drift modelling combined with population projections, we show that the probability of randomly reaching Sahul by any route is <5% until ≥40 adults are ‘washed off’ an island at least once every 20 years. We then demonstrate that choosing a time of departure and making minimal headway (0.5 knots) toward a destination greatly increases the likelihood of arrival. While drift modelling demonstrates the existence of ‘bottleneck’ crossings on all routes, arrival via New Guinea is more likely than via northwestern Australia. We conclude that anatomically modern humans had the capacity to plan and make open-sea voyages lasting several days by at least 50,000 years ago. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6579762/ /pubmed/31209234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bird, Michael I.
Condie, Scott A.
O’Connor, Sue
O’Grady, Damien
Reepmeyer, Christian
Ulm, Sean
Zega, Mojca
Saltré, Frédérik
Bradshaw, Corey J. A.
Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
title Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
title_full Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
title_fullStr Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
title_full_unstemmed Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
title_short Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
title_sort early human settlement of sahul was not an accident
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9
work_keys_str_mv AT birdmichaeli earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT condiescotta earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT oconnorsue earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT ogradydamien earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT reepmeyerchristian earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT ulmsean earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT zegamojca earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT saltrefrederik earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident
AT bradshawcoreyja earlyhumansettlementofsahulwasnotanaccident