Cargando…
Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of Carriere Distalizer: a cephalometric and study model comparison of Class II appliances
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of Carriere Distalizer in comparison to Class II intermaxillary elastics and Forsus. METHODS: Three groups of patients treated with Class II intermaxillary elastics (n = 18), Carriere Distalizer (n = 18), and Forsus ap...
Autores principales: | Yin, Kaifeng, Han, Eugene, Guo, Jing, Yasumura, Toshihiko, Grauer, Dan, Sameshima, Glenn |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6579799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0280-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block and Bionator Appliances in Treatment of Class II Malocclusion
por: Ahmadian-Babaki, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed
appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment
por: Patel, Mayara Paim, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparison of cephalometric measurements of the Twin Block and A6 appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a retrospective comparative cohort study
por: Sun, Zhiwen, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances
por: Oztoprak, Mehmet Oguz, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Evaluation and Comparison of Cervical Spine Posture in Class II Division I Patients Treated with Twin Block Appliances, Forsus Appliances, and Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Cephalometric Study
por: Krishna, S. S. Suji, et al.
Publicado: (2023)