Cargando…

Effect of early tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the timing of tracheostomy in patients who required prolonged mechanical ventilation using two methods: analysis of early versus late tracheostomy and landmark analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients who were emergently intubated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dochi, Hirotomo, Nojima, Masanori, Matsumura, Michiya, Cammack, Ivor, Furuta, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.265
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the timing of tracheostomy in patients who required prolonged mechanical ventilation using two methods: analysis of early versus late tracheostomy and landmark analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients who were emergently intubated and admitted into the intensive care unit or high dependency unit between January 2011 and August 2016, with or without tracheostomy, were included. In the early and late tracheostomy analysis, all patients were divided into early (≤10 days, n = 88) and late (>10 days, n = 132) groups. In the landmark analysis, 198 patients requiring ventilation for more than 10 days were divided into early tracheostomy (≤10 days, n = 57) and nonearly tracheostomy (>10 days, n = 141) groups. We compared 60‐day ventilation withdrawal rate and 60‐day mortality. RESULTS: Early tracheostomy was a significant factor for early ventilation withdrawal, as shown by log‐rank test results (early and late tracheostomy: P = .001, landmark: P = .021). Multivariable analysis showed that the early group was also associated with a higher chance of ventilation withdrawal in each analysis (early and late tracheostomy: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20–2.39, P = .003; landmark: aHR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.06–2.38, P = .027). Early tracheostomy, however, was not associated with improved 60‐day mortality (early and late tracheostomy: aHR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.46–1.69, P = .71; landmark: aHR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.58–3.66; P = .42). CONCLUSION: For patients requiring ventilation, performing tracheostomy within 10 days of admission was independently associated with shortened duration of mechanical ventilation; 60‐day mortality was not associated with the timing of tracheostomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b