Cargando…

Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain

Background: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an intracranial, invasive method for treatment of chronic pain. Main indications for MCS are central post stroke pain, neuropathic facial pain, phantom limb pain and brachial plexus or spinal cord injury pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with burst wav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sokal, Paweł, Harat, Marek, Malukiewicz, Agnieszka, Kiec, Michał, Świtońska, Milena, Jabłońska, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354335
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S195867
_version_ 1783427979172380672
author Sokal, Paweł
Harat, Marek
Malukiewicz, Agnieszka
Kiec, Michał
Świtońska, Milena
Jabłońska, Renata
author_facet Sokal, Paweł
Harat, Marek
Malukiewicz, Agnieszka
Kiec, Michał
Świtońska, Milena
Jabłońska, Renata
author_sort Sokal, Paweł
collection PubMed
description Background: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an intracranial, invasive method for treatment of chronic pain. Main indications for MCS are central post stroke pain, neuropathic facial pain, phantom limb pain and brachial plexus or spinal cord injury pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with burst waveform has been proved to be more effective than tonic mode in chronic pain. Necessity to replace depleted batteries of motor cortex tonic stimulators gave us an opportunity of applying burst stimulation. The objective of the pilot study was to evaluate the effects of burst stimulation applied on motor cortex in patients with chronic pain syndromes as well as comparison to tonic mode. Materials and methods: We have evaluated 6 patients (females N=3, males N=3) belonging to the group of 14 cases (females N=5, males N=9) who had undergone surgical procedure of MCS in years 2005–2017. Selected for the study were 6 patients with thalamic pain N=3, with facial pain N=3 (anaesthesia dolorosa and neuropathic trigeminal neuralgia). The patients were subjected to both modes of stimulation then they chose which one was better in relieving pain: tonic or burst. Pain intensity was assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS) before the replacement of implanted pulse generator (IPG) and after the stimulation with tonic and burst modes. Results: In the study, 5 out of 6 patients with MCS found burst mode more effective than tonic mode. Baseline VAS score in patients that had at least 3 months depleted battery of tonic IPG was 95 mm. After implantation of a new IPG mean VAS score on tonic stimulation was 72 mm, on burst 53 mm. Conclusions: The most preferred option of MCS in selected group of patients was burst stimulation. This study has shown, that the burst stimulation of cerebral cortex is a promising modality when tonic stimulation is not sufficient in refractory, neuropathic pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65801412019-07-26 Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain Sokal, Paweł Harat, Marek Malukiewicz, Agnieszka Kiec, Michał Świtońska, Milena Jabłońska, Renata J Pain Res Original Research Background: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an intracranial, invasive method for treatment of chronic pain. Main indications for MCS are central post stroke pain, neuropathic facial pain, phantom limb pain and brachial plexus or spinal cord injury pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with burst waveform has been proved to be more effective than tonic mode in chronic pain. Necessity to replace depleted batteries of motor cortex tonic stimulators gave us an opportunity of applying burst stimulation. The objective of the pilot study was to evaluate the effects of burst stimulation applied on motor cortex in patients with chronic pain syndromes as well as comparison to tonic mode. Materials and methods: We have evaluated 6 patients (females N=3, males N=3) belonging to the group of 14 cases (females N=5, males N=9) who had undergone surgical procedure of MCS in years 2005–2017. Selected for the study were 6 patients with thalamic pain N=3, with facial pain N=3 (anaesthesia dolorosa and neuropathic trigeminal neuralgia). The patients were subjected to both modes of stimulation then they chose which one was better in relieving pain: tonic or burst. Pain intensity was assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS) before the replacement of implanted pulse generator (IPG) and after the stimulation with tonic and burst modes. Results: In the study, 5 out of 6 patients with MCS found burst mode more effective than tonic mode. Baseline VAS score in patients that had at least 3 months depleted battery of tonic IPG was 95 mm. After implantation of a new IPG mean VAS score on tonic stimulation was 72 mm, on burst 53 mm. Conclusions: The most preferred option of MCS in selected group of patients was burst stimulation. This study has shown, that the burst stimulation of cerebral cortex is a promising modality when tonic stimulation is not sufficient in refractory, neuropathic pain. Dove 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6580141/ /pubmed/31354335 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S195867 Text en © 2019 Sokal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sokal, Paweł
Harat, Marek
Malukiewicz, Agnieszka
Kiec, Michał
Świtońska, Milena
Jabłońska, Renata
Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
title Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
title_full Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
title_fullStr Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
title_short Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
title_sort effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31354335
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S195867
work_keys_str_mv AT sokalpaweł effectivenessoftonicandburstmotorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicpain
AT haratmarek effectivenessoftonicandburstmotorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicpain
AT malukiewiczagnieszka effectivenessoftonicandburstmotorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicpain
AT kiecmichał effectivenessoftonicandburstmotorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicpain
AT switonskamilena effectivenessoftonicandburstmotorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicpain
AT jabłonskarenata effectivenessoftonicandburstmotorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicpain