Cargando…

Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making

This paper presents findings from an interdisciplinary project undertaken in Victoria, Australia, investigating the barriers and facilitators to supported decision-making (SDM) for people living with diagnoses including schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, and severe depression; family member...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brophy, Lisa, Kokanovic, Renata, Flore, Jacinthe, McSherry, Bernadette, Herrman, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00414
_version_ 1783428013795311616
author Brophy, Lisa
Kokanovic, Renata
Flore, Jacinthe
McSherry, Bernadette
Herrman, Helen
author_facet Brophy, Lisa
Kokanovic, Renata
Flore, Jacinthe
McSherry, Bernadette
Herrman, Helen
author_sort Brophy, Lisa
collection PubMed
description This paper presents findings from an interdisciplinary project undertaken in Victoria, Australia, investigating the barriers and facilitators to supported decision-making (SDM) for people living with diagnoses including schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, and severe depression; family members supporting them; and mental health practitioners, including psychiatrists. We considered how SDM can be used to align Australian laws and practice with international human rights obligations. The project examined the experiences, views, and preferences of consumers of mental health services, including people with experiences of being on Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), in relation to enabling SDM in mental health service delivery. It also examined the perspectives of informal family members or carers and mental health practitioners. Victoria currently has high rates of use of CTOs, and the emphasis on SDM in the Mental Health Act, 2014, is proposed as one method for reducing coercion within the mental health system and working towards more recovery-oriented practice. Our findings cautiously suggest that SDM may contribute to reducing the use of CTOs, encouraging less use of coercive practices, and improving the experience of people who are subject to these orders, through greater respect for their views and preferences. Nonetheless, the participants in our study expressed an often ambivalent stance towards CTOs. In particular, the emphasis on medication as the primary treatment option and the limited communication about distressing side effects, alongside lack of choice of medication, was a primary source of concern. Fears, particularly among staff, about the risk of harm to self and others, and stigma attached to complex mental health conditions experienced by consumers and their families, represent important overarching concerns in the implementation of CTOs. Supporting the decision-making of people on CTOs, respecting their views and preferences about treatment, and moving towards reducing the use of CTOs require system-wide transformation and a significant shift in values and practice across mental health service delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65803822019-06-26 Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making Brophy, Lisa Kokanovic, Renata Flore, Jacinthe McSherry, Bernadette Herrman, Helen Front Psychiatry Psychiatry This paper presents findings from an interdisciplinary project undertaken in Victoria, Australia, investigating the barriers and facilitators to supported decision-making (SDM) for people living with diagnoses including schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, and severe depression; family members supporting them; and mental health practitioners, including psychiatrists. We considered how SDM can be used to align Australian laws and practice with international human rights obligations. The project examined the experiences, views, and preferences of consumers of mental health services, including people with experiences of being on Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), in relation to enabling SDM in mental health service delivery. It also examined the perspectives of informal family members or carers and mental health practitioners. Victoria currently has high rates of use of CTOs, and the emphasis on SDM in the Mental Health Act, 2014, is proposed as one method for reducing coercion within the mental health system and working towards more recovery-oriented practice. Our findings cautiously suggest that SDM may contribute to reducing the use of CTOs, encouraging less use of coercive practices, and improving the experience of people who are subject to these orders, through greater respect for their views and preferences. Nonetheless, the participants in our study expressed an often ambivalent stance towards CTOs. In particular, the emphasis on medication as the primary treatment option and the limited communication about distressing side effects, alongside lack of choice of medication, was a primary source of concern. Fears, particularly among staff, about the risk of harm to self and others, and stigma attached to complex mental health conditions experienced by consumers and their families, represent important overarching concerns in the implementation of CTOs. Supporting the decision-making of people on CTOs, respecting their views and preferences about treatment, and moving towards reducing the use of CTOs require system-wide transformation and a significant shift in values and practice across mental health service delivery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6580382/ /pubmed/31244699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00414 Text en Copyright © 2019 Brophy, Kokanovic, Flore, McSherry and Herrman http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Brophy, Lisa
Kokanovic, Renata
Flore, Jacinthe
McSherry, Bernadette
Herrman, Helen
Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making
title Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making
title_full Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making
title_fullStr Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making
title_short Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making
title_sort community treatment orders and supported decision-making
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00414
work_keys_str_mv AT brophylisa communitytreatmentordersandsupporteddecisionmaking
AT kokanovicrenata communitytreatmentordersandsupporteddecisionmaking
AT florejacinthe communitytreatmentordersandsupporteddecisionmaking
AT mcsherrybernadette communitytreatmentordersandsupporteddecisionmaking
AT herrmanhelen communitytreatmentordersandsupporteddecisionmaking