Cargando…
Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: An adequate number of prenatal consultations is beneficial to the health of the mother and fetus. Guidelines recommend an average of 5–14 consultations. Daily practice, however, shows that some women attend the midwifery practice more frequently. This study examined factors associated wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2316-5 |
_version_ | 1783428026188431360 |
---|---|
author | Gitsels – van der Wal, Janneke T. Gitsels, Lisanne A. Hooker, Angelo van Weert, Britte Martin, Linda Feijen – de Jong, Esther I. |
author_facet | Gitsels – van der Wal, Janneke T. Gitsels, Lisanne A. Hooker, Angelo van Weert, Britte Martin, Linda Feijen – de Jong, Esther I. |
author_sort | Gitsels – van der Wal, Janneke T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An adequate number of prenatal consultations is beneficial to the health of the mother and fetus. Guidelines recommend an average of 5–14 consultations. Daily practice, however, shows that some women attend the midwifery practice more frequently. This study examined factors associated with frequent attendance in midwifery-led care. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large midwifery practice in the Netherlands among low-risk women who started prenatal care in 2015 and 2016. Based on Andersen’s behavioral model, we collected data on potential determinants from the digital midwifery’s practice database. Prenatal healthcare utilization was measured by a revised version of the Kotelchuck Index, which measures a combination of care entry and numbers of visits. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the likelihood of frequent attendance compared to the recommended number of visits, adjusted for all relevant factors. Separate models were fitted on the non-referred and the referred group of obstetric-led care, as referral was found to be an effect modifier. RESULTS: The prevalence of frequent attendance was 23% (243/1053), mainly caused by worries and/or vague complaints (44%; 106/243). Among non-referred women, 53% (560/1053), frequent attendance was associated with consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 3.99 (2.35–6.77)) and exposure to sexual violence (OR = 2.17 (1.11–4.24)). Among the referred participants, 47% (493/1053), frequent attendance was associated with a consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 2.75 (1.66–4.57)), psychosocial problems in the past or present (OR = 1.85 (1.02–3.35) or OR = 2.99 (1.43–6.25)), overweight (OR = 1.88 (1.09–3.24)), and deprived area (OR = 0.50 (0.27–0.92)). CONCLUSION: Our exploratory study indicates that the determinants of frequent attendance in midwifery-led care differs between non-referred and referred women. Underlying causes for frequent attendance was mainly because of non-medical reasons. Implication for practice: A trustful midwife-client relationship is known to be needed for clients such as frequent attenders to share more detailed, personal stories in case of vague complaints or worries, which is necessary to identify their implicit needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6580473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65804732019-06-24 Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study Gitsels – van der Wal, Janneke T. Gitsels, Lisanne A. Hooker, Angelo van Weert, Britte Martin, Linda Feijen – de Jong, Esther I. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: An adequate number of prenatal consultations is beneficial to the health of the mother and fetus. Guidelines recommend an average of 5–14 consultations. Daily practice, however, shows that some women attend the midwifery practice more frequently. This study examined factors associated with frequent attendance in midwifery-led care. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large midwifery practice in the Netherlands among low-risk women who started prenatal care in 2015 and 2016. Based on Andersen’s behavioral model, we collected data on potential determinants from the digital midwifery’s practice database. Prenatal healthcare utilization was measured by a revised version of the Kotelchuck Index, which measures a combination of care entry and numbers of visits. Logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the likelihood of frequent attendance compared to the recommended number of visits, adjusted for all relevant factors. Separate models were fitted on the non-referred and the referred group of obstetric-led care, as referral was found to be an effect modifier. RESULTS: The prevalence of frequent attendance was 23% (243/1053), mainly caused by worries and/or vague complaints (44%; 106/243). Among non-referred women, 53% (560/1053), frequent attendance was associated with consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 3.99 (2.35–6.77)) and exposure to sexual violence (OR = 2.17 (1.11–4.24)). Among the referred participants, 47% (493/1053), frequent attendance was associated with a consultation with an obstetrician (OR = 2.75 (1.66–4.57)), psychosocial problems in the past or present (OR = 1.85 (1.02–3.35) or OR = 2.99 (1.43–6.25)), overweight (OR = 1.88 (1.09–3.24)), and deprived area (OR = 0.50 (0.27–0.92)). CONCLUSION: Our exploratory study indicates that the determinants of frequent attendance in midwifery-led care differs between non-referred and referred women. Underlying causes for frequent attendance was mainly because of non-medical reasons. Implication for practice: A trustful midwife-client relationship is known to be needed for clients such as frequent attenders to share more detailed, personal stories in case of vague complaints or worries, which is necessary to identify their implicit needs. BioMed Central 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6580473/ /pubmed/31208355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2316-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gitsels – van der Wal, Janneke T. Gitsels, Lisanne A. Hooker, Angelo van Weert, Britte Martin, Linda Feijen – de Jong, Esther I. Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
title | Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
title_full | Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
title_short | Determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
title_sort | determinants and underlying causes of frequent attendance in midwife-led care: an exploratory cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2316-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gitselsvanderwaljanneket determinantsandunderlyingcausesoffrequentattendanceinmidwifeledcareanexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT gitselslisannea determinantsandunderlyingcausesoffrequentattendanceinmidwifeledcareanexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT hookerangelo determinantsandunderlyingcausesoffrequentattendanceinmidwifeledcareanexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT vanweertbritte determinantsandunderlyingcausesoffrequentattendanceinmidwifeledcareanexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT martinlinda determinantsandunderlyingcausesoffrequentattendanceinmidwifeledcareanexploratorycrosssectionalstudy AT feijendejongestheri determinantsandunderlyingcausesoffrequentattendanceinmidwifeledcareanexploratorycrosssectionalstudy |