Cargando…

Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH) is a common side effect of clozapine treatment and is disliked by clozapine patients, potentially threatening adherence to clozapine treatment. We proposed a trial of alternative medications, hyoscine and glycopyrrolate, for the treatment of CIH an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qurashi, Inti, Chu, Simon, Drake, Richard, Hartley, Victoria, Chaudhry, Imran, Deakin, J. F. W., Husain, Nusrat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0462-1
_version_ 1783428042982424576
author Qurashi, Inti
Chu, Simon
Drake, Richard
Hartley, Victoria
Chaudhry, Imran
Deakin, J. F. W.
Husain, Nusrat
author_facet Qurashi, Inti
Chu, Simon
Drake, Richard
Hartley, Victoria
Chaudhry, Imran
Deakin, J. F. W.
Husain, Nusrat
author_sort Qurashi, Inti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH) is a common side effect of clozapine treatment and is disliked by clozapine patients, potentially threatening adherence to clozapine treatment. We proposed a trial of alternative medications, hyoscine and glycopyrrolate, for the treatment of CIH and the primary objective of the feasibility study was to assess the recruitment and retention of community clozapine patients as well as assess the metrics of the primary hypersalivation measure. METHODS: This 11-month trial took place in two NHS trusts in northwest UK. Participants were community-dwelling clozapine patients aged 18–65 years who were suffering from CIH, and were recruited from community mental health clinics. They were randomised using a telephone randomisation service to receive either hyoscine (1 week at 0.6 mg daily, 3 weeks at 0.9 mg daily), glycopyrrolate (1 week at 2 mg daily, 3 weeks at 3 mg daily) or placebo. Participants and investigators were blinded to which study arm the participants had been randomised to. We collected data on salivation levels and side effects on a weekly basis and also assessed cognition at the beginning and end of the trial. We also interviewed a sample of participants after the trial to gather information on their experience of having taken part. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight potential participants agreed to being contacted by researchers about participation in the trial and of these, 29 participants were randomised. Of these, four participants exited the trial before taking any trial medication, and two participants left the study owing to concerns of side effects. Data from four participants was missing, and complete data was available for 19 participants who completed the trial. The mean recruitment rate overall was 1.3 participants per site per month, and the overall retention rate was 76%. Interview data suggested that participants’ experiences of trial participation were overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility study demonstrated that a trial of alternative medications in the treatment of CIH is feasible; patients were willing to be randomised to the trial and retention rate was high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02613494, registered 24 November 2015
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65805602019-06-24 Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study Qurashi, Inti Chu, Simon Drake, Richard Hartley, Victoria Chaudhry, Imran Deakin, J. F. W. Husain, Nusrat Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH) is a common side effect of clozapine treatment and is disliked by clozapine patients, potentially threatening adherence to clozapine treatment. We proposed a trial of alternative medications, hyoscine and glycopyrrolate, for the treatment of CIH and the primary objective of the feasibility study was to assess the recruitment and retention of community clozapine patients as well as assess the metrics of the primary hypersalivation measure. METHODS: This 11-month trial took place in two NHS trusts in northwest UK. Participants were community-dwelling clozapine patients aged 18–65 years who were suffering from CIH, and were recruited from community mental health clinics. They were randomised using a telephone randomisation service to receive either hyoscine (1 week at 0.6 mg daily, 3 weeks at 0.9 mg daily), glycopyrrolate (1 week at 2 mg daily, 3 weeks at 3 mg daily) or placebo. Participants and investigators were blinded to which study arm the participants had been randomised to. We collected data on salivation levels and side effects on a weekly basis and also assessed cognition at the beginning and end of the trial. We also interviewed a sample of participants after the trial to gather information on their experience of having taken part. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight potential participants agreed to being contacted by researchers about participation in the trial and of these, 29 participants were randomised. Of these, four participants exited the trial before taking any trial medication, and two participants left the study owing to concerns of side effects. Data from four participants was missing, and complete data was available for 19 participants who completed the trial. The mean recruitment rate overall was 1.3 participants per site per month, and the overall retention rate was 76%. Interview data suggested that participants’ experiences of trial participation were overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility study demonstrated that a trial of alternative medications in the treatment of CIH is feasible; patients were willing to be randomised to the trial and retention rate was high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02613494, registered 24 November 2015 BioMed Central 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6580560/ /pubmed/31236286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0462-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Qurashi, Inti
Chu, Simon
Drake, Richard
Hartley, Victoria
Chaudhry, Imran
Deakin, J. F. W.
Husain, Nusrat
Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study
title Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study
title_full Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study
title_fullStr Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study
title_short Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study
title_sort glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (gothic1): a feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31236286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0462-1
work_keys_str_mv AT qurashiinti glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy
AT chusimon glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy
AT drakerichard glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy
AT hartleyvictoria glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy
AT chaudhryimran glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy
AT deakinjfw glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy
AT husainnusrat glycopyrrolateincomparisontohyoscinehydrobromideandplacebointhetreatmentofhypersalivationinducedbyclozapinegothic1afeasibilitystudy