Cargando…

Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Metal sensitivity as a cause for painful joint replacement has become increasingly prevalent; however, there is a lack of reported clinical outcome data from total knee arthroplasty patients with metal allergies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients presenting with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zondervan, Robert L., Vaux, Jonathan J., Blackmer, Michael J., Brazier, Brett G., Taunt, Charles J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4
_version_ 1783428049381883904
author Zondervan, Robert L.
Vaux, Jonathan J.
Blackmer, Michael J.
Brazier, Brett G.
Taunt, Charles J.
author_facet Zondervan, Robert L.
Vaux, Jonathan J.
Blackmer, Michael J.
Brazier, Brett G.
Taunt, Charles J.
author_sort Zondervan, Robert L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metal sensitivity as a cause for painful joint replacement has become increasingly prevalent; however, there is a lack of reported clinical outcome data from total knee arthroplasty patients with metal allergies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients presenting with a painful total knee arthroplasty with a positive metal sensitivity have improved outcomes following revision to a hypoallergenic implant. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients that underwent a revision total knee arthroplasty after metal sensitivity testing over a 3-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of sensitivity testing, patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty to a hypoallergenic component or a standard component. Following revision, patients returned to the clinic at an interval of 6 weeks, 5 months, and 12 months for functional, pain, and satisfaction assessment. Outcomes were compared within and between sensitivity groups. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 78.3% (39/46) were positive for metal sensitivity. The most common metal sensitivity was to nickel (79.5%, 32/39). Both non-reactive and reactive patients significantly improved in range of motion after revision arthroplasty. The reactive group saw a 37.8% decrease in pain at 6 weeks post-revision (p < 0.001) Whereas, the non-reactive group only saw a moderate, non-significant improvement in pain reduction at 6 weeks post-revision (27.0%; p = 0.29). Frequency of pain experienced did not vary significantly between groups. Maximum metal lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) sensitivity score did not correlate with pain level at the time of revision (R(2) = 0.02, p = 0.38) or percent improvement after revision (R(2) = 0.001, p = 0.81). Overall, all patients reported being very satisfied after revision total knee arthroplasty; there was no difference between positive and negative sensitivity groups (W = 62, p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with a painful knee arthroplasty and positive metal LTT have improved pain scores, walking function, and range of motion following revision to a hypoallergenic component. This study also provides a treatment algorithm for patients presenting with a painful knee replacement, in order to provide effective and timely diagnosis and management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65805882019-06-24 Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty Zondervan, Robert L. Vaux, Jonathan J. Blackmer, Michael J. Brazier, Brett G. Taunt, Charles J. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Metal sensitivity as a cause for painful joint replacement has become increasingly prevalent; however, there is a lack of reported clinical outcome data from total knee arthroplasty patients with metal allergies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients presenting with a painful total knee arthroplasty with a positive metal sensitivity have improved outcomes following revision to a hypoallergenic implant. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients that underwent a revision total knee arthroplasty after metal sensitivity testing over a 3-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of sensitivity testing, patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty to a hypoallergenic component or a standard component. Following revision, patients returned to the clinic at an interval of 6 weeks, 5 months, and 12 months for functional, pain, and satisfaction assessment. Outcomes were compared within and between sensitivity groups. RESULTS: Of the included patients, 78.3% (39/46) were positive for metal sensitivity. The most common metal sensitivity was to nickel (79.5%, 32/39). Both non-reactive and reactive patients significantly improved in range of motion after revision arthroplasty. The reactive group saw a 37.8% decrease in pain at 6 weeks post-revision (p < 0.001) Whereas, the non-reactive group only saw a moderate, non-significant improvement in pain reduction at 6 weeks post-revision (27.0%; p = 0.29). Frequency of pain experienced did not vary significantly between groups. Maximum metal lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) sensitivity score did not correlate with pain level at the time of revision (R(2) = 0.02, p = 0.38) or percent improvement after revision (R(2) = 0.001, p = 0.81). Overall, all patients reported being very satisfied after revision total knee arthroplasty; there was no difference between positive and negative sensitivity groups (W = 62, p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with a painful knee arthroplasty and positive metal LTT have improved pain scores, walking function, and range of motion following revision to a hypoallergenic component. This study also provides a treatment algorithm for patients presenting with a painful knee replacement, in order to provide effective and timely diagnosis and management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6580588/ /pubmed/31208448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zondervan, Robert L.
Vaux, Jonathan J.
Blackmer, Michael J.
Brazier, Brett G.
Taunt, Charles J.
Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
title Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
title_full Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
title_short Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
title_sort improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zondervanrobertl improvedoutcomesinpatientswithpositivemetalsensitivityfollowingrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT vauxjonathanj improvedoutcomesinpatientswithpositivemetalsensitivityfollowingrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT blackmermichaelj improvedoutcomesinpatientswithpositivemetalsensitivityfollowingrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT brazierbrettg improvedoutcomesinpatientswithpositivemetalsensitivityfollowingrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty
AT tauntcharlesj improvedoutcomesinpatientswithpositivemetalsensitivityfollowingrevisiontotalkneearthroplasty