Cargando…

Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ICD performance using enhanced detection algorithms in unselected, non-trial patients. Performance of recent generation ICD equipped with SmartShock™ technology (SST) for detection and conversion of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) was investigated. METHODS: 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Regoli, François, Graf, Denis, Schaer, Beat, Duru, Firat, Ammann, Peter, Stefano, Lorenza Mangoni di S., Naegli, Barbara, Burri, Haran, Zbinden, Rainer, Krasniqi, Nazmi, Fromer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1121-4
_version_ 1783428061247569920
author Regoli, François
Graf, Denis
Schaer, Beat
Duru, Firat
Ammann, Peter
Stefano, Lorenza Mangoni di S.
Naegli, Barbara
Burri, Haran
Zbinden, Rainer
Krasniqi, Nazmi
Fromer, Martin
author_facet Regoli, François
Graf, Denis
Schaer, Beat
Duru, Firat
Ammann, Peter
Stefano, Lorenza Mangoni di S.
Naegli, Barbara
Burri, Haran
Zbinden, Rainer
Krasniqi, Nazmi
Fromer, Martin
author_sort Regoli, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ICD performance using enhanced detection algorithms in unselected, non-trial patients. Performance of recent generation ICD equipped with SmartShock™ technology (SST) for detection and conversion of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) was investigated. METHODS: 4P was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in 10 Swiss implanting centers. Patients with a Class I indication according to international guidelines were included and received an ICD with SST. ICD discrimination capability was assessed by evaluating SST performance; therapy efficacy was assessed by rate of VTA conversions by ATP and by rescue shocks. RESULTS: Overall, 196 patients were included in the analysis with a mean duration of follow-up of 27.7 months (452 patient-years of observation). Patient-specific rather than recommended programming was preferred. Device-detected episodes were frequent (5147 episodes in 146 patients, 74.5%). In 44 patients (22.4%), 1274 episodes were categorized as VTA; only 215 episodes were symptomatic. ATP was the first-line therapy and highly effective (99.9% success rate at the episode level, 100.0% at the patient level). Rescue shocks were rare (66 episodes in 28 patients); 7 shocks in 5 patients (2.6%) were inappropriate. Death and hospitalization rates were low. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of non-trial, unselected ICD patients, VTA episodes were frequent. The 4P results confirm the robustness of VTA detection by SST and the effectiveness of ATP treatment, hence limiting overall ICD shock burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65806382019-06-24 Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P) Regoli, François Graf, Denis Schaer, Beat Duru, Firat Ammann, Peter Stefano, Lorenza Mangoni di S. Naegli, Barbara Burri, Haran Zbinden, Rainer Krasniqi, Nazmi Fromer, Martin BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ICD performance using enhanced detection algorithms in unselected, non-trial patients. Performance of recent generation ICD equipped with SmartShock™ technology (SST) for detection and conversion of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) was investigated. METHODS: 4P was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in 10 Swiss implanting centers. Patients with a Class I indication according to international guidelines were included and received an ICD with SST. ICD discrimination capability was assessed by evaluating SST performance; therapy efficacy was assessed by rate of VTA conversions by ATP and by rescue shocks. RESULTS: Overall, 196 patients were included in the analysis with a mean duration of follow-up of 27.7 months (452 patient-years of observation). Patient-specific rather than recommended programming was preferred. Device-detected episodes were frequent (5147 episodes in 146 patients, 74.5%). In 44 patients (22.4%), 1274 episodes were categorized as VTA; only 215 episodes were symptomatic. ATP was the first-line therapy and highly effective (99.9% success rate at the episode level, 100.0% at the patient level). Rescue shocks were rare (66 episodes in 28 patients); 7 shocks in 5 patients (2.6%) were inappropriate. Death and hospitalization rates were low. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of non-trial, unselected ICD patients, VTA episodes were frequent. The 4P results confirm the robustness of VTA detection by SST and the effectiveness of ATP treatment, hence limiting overall ICD shock burden. BioMed Central 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6580638/ /pubmed/31208342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1121-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Regoli, François
Graf, Denis
Schaer, Beat
Duru, Firat
Ammann, Peter
Stefano, Lorenza Mangoni di S.
Naegli, Barbara
Burri, Haran
Zbinden, Rainer
Krasniqi, Nazmi
Fromer, Martin
Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)
title Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)
title_full Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)
title_fullStr Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)
title_full_unstemmed Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)
title_short Arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the Prospective Study on Predictive Quality with Preferencing PainFree ATP therapies (4P)
title_sort arrhythmic episodes in patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator – results from the prospective study on predictive quality with preferencing painfree atp therapies (4p)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31208342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1121-4
work_keys_str_mv AT regolifrancois arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT grafdenis arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT schaerbeat arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT durufirat arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT ammannpeter arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT stefanolorenzamangonidis arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT naeglibarbara arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT burriharan arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT zbindenrainer arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT krasniqinazmi arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT fromermartin arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p
AT arrhythmicepisodesinpatientsimplantedwithacardioverterdefibrillatorresultsfromtheprospectivestudyonpredictivequalitywithpreferencingpainfreeatptherapies4p