Cargando…

Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction, distal biceps tendon repair, and elbow arthroscopic surgery are common elbow procedures performed in active patients. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized (1) good to excellent correlation between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rojas, Edward O., Glass, Natalie, Owens, Jessell, Anthony, Chris A., Bollier, Matthew, Wolf, Brian R., Hettrich, Carolyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119852595
_version_ 1783428073017835520
author Rojas, Edward O.
Glass, Natalie
Owens, Jessell
Anthony, Chris A.
Bollier, Matthew
Wolf, Brian R.
Hettrich, Carolyn
author_facet Rojas, Edward O.
Glass, Natalie
Owens, Jessell
Anthony, Chris A.
Bollier, Matthew
Wolf, Brian R.
Hettrich, Carolyn
author_sort Rojas, Edward O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction, distal biceps tendon repair, and elbow arthroscopic surgery are common elbow procedures performed in active patients. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized (1) good to excellent correlation between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments and traditional orthopaedic upper extremity patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures; (2) that PROMIS instruments would demonstrate ceiling effects; and (3) that the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test (PF CAT) would demonstrate a low question burden compared with other PRO instruments. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 76 patients undergoing UCL repair/reconstruction, distal biceps tendon repair, or elbow arthroscopic surgery filled out the Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Function subscale, EuroQol–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire, PROMIS PF CAT, and PROMIS upper extremity item bank (UE). Excellent correlation between PROs was defined as ≥.70. RESULTS: The PROMIS PF CAT had excellent correlation with the SF-36 (r = 0.74; P < .0001), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) survey (r = –0.76; P < .0001), and PROMIS UE (r = 0.73; P < .0001). The PROMIS UE demonstrated excellent correlation with the SF-36 (r = 0.73; P < .0001) and DASH survey (r = –0.81; P < .0001). The PROMIS UE had ceiling effects in 33% of patients. The SF-36 showed ceiling effects in 20% of patients. On average, patients answered 5.1 ± 2.2 questions on the PROMIS PF CAT. CONCLUSION: The PROMIS PF CAT and PROMIS UE are valid in patients undergoing distal biceps tendon repair, elbow arthroscopic surgery, and UCL repair. The PROMIS UE demonstrated high ceiling effects in younger, higher functioning patients and should be used with caution in this group. A further evaluation and modification of the PROMIS UE in younger, high-functioning patients are warranted. Finally, the PROMIS PF CAT exhibited a low question burden relative to traditional PRO instruments without the loss of reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65807172019-06-26 Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures Rojas, Edward O. Glass, Natalie Owens, Jessell Anthony, Chris A. Bollier, Matthew Wolf, Brian R. Hettrich, Carolyn Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction, distal biceps tendon repair, and elbow arthroscopic surgery are common elbow procedures performed in active patients. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized (1) good to excellent correlation between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments and traditional orthopaedic upper extremity patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures; (2) that PROMIS instruments would demonstrate ceiling effects; and (3) that the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test (PF CAT) would demonstrate a low question burden compared with other PRO instruments. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 76 patients undergoing UCL repair/reconstruction, distal biceps tendon repair, or elbow arthroscopic surgery filled out the Short Form–36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Function subscale, EuroQol–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire, PROMIS PF CAT, and PROMIS upper extremity item bank (UE). Excellent correlation between PROs was defined as ≥.70. RESULTS: The PROMIS PF CAT had excellent correlation with the SF-36 (r = 0.74; P < .0001), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) survey (r = –0.76; P < .0001), and PROMIS UE (r = 0.73; P < .0001). The PROMIS UE demonstrated excellent correlation with the SF-36 (r = 0.73; P < .0001) and DASH survey (r = –0.81; P < .0001). The PROMIS UE had ceiling effects in 33% of patients. The SF-36 showed ceiling effects in 20% of patients. On average, patients answered 5.1 ± 2.2 questions on the PROMIS PF CAT. CONCLUSION: The PROMIS PF CAT and PROMIS UE are valid in patients undergoing distal biceps tendon repair, elbow arthroscopic surgery, and UCL repair. The PROMIS UE demonstrated high ceiling effects in younger, higher functioning patients and should be used with caution in this group. A further evaluation and modification of the PROMIS UE in younger, high-functioning patients are warranted. Finally, the PROMIS PF CAT exhibited a low question burden relative to traditional PRO instruments without the loss of reliability. SAGE Publications 2019-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6580717/ /pubmed/31245430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119852595 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Rojas, Edward O.
Glass, Natalie
Owens, Jessell
Anthony, Chris A.
Bollier, Matthew
Wolf, Brian R.
Hettrich, Carolyn
Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures
title Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures
title_full Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures
title_fullStr Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures
title_short Performance of the PROMIS in Patients Undergoing 3 Common Elbow Procedures
title_sort performance of the promis in patients undergoing 3 common elbow procedures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119852595
work_keys_str_mv AT rojasedwardo performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures
AT glassnatalie performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures
AT owensjessell performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures
AT anthonychrisa performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures
AT bolliermatthew performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures
AT wolfbrianr performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures
AT hettrichcarolyn performanceofthepromisinpatientsundergoing3commonelbowprocedures