Cargando…

Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic regimens used to treat pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane guidelines. Qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savaris, Ricardo F, Fuhrich, Daniele G, Duarte, Rui V, Franik, Sebastian, Ross, Jonathan D C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053693
_version_ 1783428076258983936
author Savaris, Ricardo F
Fuhrich, Daniele G
Duarte, Rui V
Franik, Sebastian
Ross, Jonathan D C
author_facet Savaris, Ricardo F
Fuhrich, Daniele G
Duarte, Rui V
Franik, Sebastian
Ross, Jonathan D C
author_sort Savaris, Ricardo F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic regimens used to treat pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases were searched from date of inception up to July 2016. Database searches were complemented by screening of reference lists of relevant studies, trial registers, conference proceeding abstracts and grey literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs comparing the use of antibiotics with placebo or other antibiotics for the treatment of PID in women of reproductive age, either as inpatient or outpatient treatment. RESULTS: We included 37 RCTs (6348 women). The quality of evidence ranged from very low to high, the main limitations being serious risk of bias (due to poor reporting of study methods and lack of blinding), serious inconsistency and serious imprecision. There was no clear evidence of a difference in the rates of cure for mild-moderate or for severe PID for the comparisons of azithromycin versus doxycycline, quinolone versus cephalosporin, nitroimidazole versus no use of nitroimidazole, clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus quinolone, or clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus cephalosporin. No clear evidence of a difference between regimens in antibiotic-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found no conclusive evidence that one regimen of antibiotics was safer or more effective than any other for the treatment of PID, and there was no clear evidence for the use of nitroimidazoles (metronidazole) compared with the use of other drugs with activity against anaerobes. More evidence is needed to assess treatments for women with PID, particularly comparing regimens with or without the addition of nitroimidazoles and the efficacy of azithromycin compared with doxycycline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65807362019-07-02 Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Savaris, Ricardo F Fuhrich, Daniele G Duarte, Rui V Franik, Sebastian Ross, Jonathan D C Sex Transm Infect Review OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic regimens used to treat pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases were searched from date of inception up to July 2016. Database searches were complemented by screening of reference lists of relevant studies, trial registers, conference proceeding abstracts and grey literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs comparing the use of antibiotics with placebo or other antibiotics for the treatment of PID in women of reproductive age, either as inpatient or outpatient treatment. RESULTS: We included 37 RCTs (6348 women). The quality of evidence ranged from very low to high, the main limitations being serious risk of bias (due to poor reporting of study methods and lack of blinding), serious inconsistency and serious imprecision. There was no clear evidence of a difference in the rates of cure for mild-moderate or for severe PID for the comparisons of azithromycin versus doxycycline, quinolone versus cephalosporin, nitroimidazole versus no use of nitroimidazole, clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus quinolone, or clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus cephalosporin. No clear evidence of a difference between regimens in antibiotic-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found no conclusive evidence that one regimen of antibiotics was safer or more effective than any other for the treatment of PID, and there was no clear evidence for the use of nitroimidazoles (metronidazole) compared with the use of other drugs with activity against anaerobes. More evidence is needed to assess treatments for women with PID, particularly comparing regimens with or without the addition of nitroimidazoles and the efficacy of azithromycin compared with doxycycline. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02 2018-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6580736/ /pubmed/30341232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053693 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Review
Savaris, Ricardo F
Fuhrich, Daniele G
Duarte, Rui V
Franik, Sebastian
Ross, Jonathan D C
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053693
work_keys_str_mv AT savarisricardof antibiotictherapyforpelvicinflammatorydiseaseanabridgedversionofacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT fuhrichdanieleg antibiotictherapyforpelvicinflammatorydiseaseanabridgedversionofacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT duarteruiv antibiotictherapyforpelvicinflammatorydiseaseanabridgedversionofacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT franiksebastian antibiotictherapyforpelvicinflammatorydiseaseanabridgedversionofacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT rossjonathandc antibiotictherapyforpelvicinflammatorydiseaseanabridgedversionofacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials