Cargando…
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
OBJECTIVES: Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are among the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections worldwide, most of which are asymptomatic. Detection of infection using a variety of specimen types in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053545 |
_version_ | 1783428084014252032 |
---|---|
author | Nye, Melinda B Osiecki, John Lewinski, Michael Liesenfeld, Oliver Young, Stephen Taylor, Stephanie N Lillis, Rebecca A Body, Barbara A Eisenhut, Carol Hook III, Edward W Van Der Pol, Barbara |
author_facet | Nye, Melinda B Osiecki, John Lewinski, Michael Liesenfeld, Oliver Young, Stephen Taylor, Stephanie N Lillis, Rebecca A Body, Barbara A Eisenhut, Carol Hook III, Edward W Van Der Pol, Barbara |
author_sort | Nye, Melinda B |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are among the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections worldwide, most of which are asymptomatic. Detection of infection using a variety of specimen types in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects is important to effectively combat CT/NG infections. The performance of the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test was assessed for urogenital swabs, urine and cervical cytology samples collected in PreservCyt Solution from 5266 symptomatic and asymptomatic women (including 202 who were pregnant), and urine from 738 men. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were estimated compared with a patient infected status determined using two US Food and Drug Administration–cleared nucleic acid amplification tests. RESULTS: Among 6004 participants, 487 CT (8.1%) and 159 NG (2.6%) infections were identified. Sensitivity estimates for CT for women ranged from 91.2% to 97.6% depending on specimen type, and the estimate for male urine specimens was 98.4%. Specificity for CT ranged from 99.2% to 99.7%. Sensitivity estimates for NG ranged from 95.6% to 100.0% for women, and the estimate for men was 100.0%. Specificity for NG ranged from 99.3% to 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas CT/NG v2.0 test performs well using urogenital swabs, urine and cervical samples collected in PreservCyt solution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6580769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65807692019-07-02 Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays Nye, Melinda B Osiecki, John Lewinski, Michael Liesenfeld, Oliver Young, Stephen Taylor, Stephanie N Lillis, Rebecca A Body, Barbara A Eisenhut, Carol Hook III, Edward W Van Der Pol, Barbara Sex Transm Infect Clinical OBJECTIVES: Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are among the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections worldwide, most of which are asymptomatic. Detection of infection using a variety of specimen types in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects is important to effectively combat CT/NG infections. The performance of the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test was assessed for urogenital swabs, urine and cervical cytology samples collected in PreservCyt Solution from 5266 symptomatic and asymptomatic women (including 202 who were pregnant), and urine from 738 men. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were estimated compared with a patient infected status determined using two US Food and Drug Administration–cleared nucleic acid amplification tests. RESULTS: Among 6004 participants, 487 CT (8.1%) and 159 NG (2.6%) infections were identified. Sensitivity estimates for CT for women ranged from 91.2% to 97.6% depending on specimen type, and the estimate for male urine specimens was 98.4%. Specificity for CT ranged from 99.2% to 99.7%. Sensitivity estimates for NG ranged from 95.6% to 100.0% for women, and the estimate for men was 100.0%. Specificity for NG ranged from 99.3% to 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas CT/NG v2.0 test performs well using urogenital swabs, urine and cervical samples collected in PreservCyt solution. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6580769/ /pubmed/30126947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053545 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Clinical Nye, Melinda B Osiecki, John Lewinski, Michael Liesenfeld, Oliver Young, Stephen Taylor, Stephanie N Lillis, Rebecca A Body, Barbara A Eisenhut, Carol Hook III, Edward W Van Der Pol, Barbara Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays |
title | Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays |
title_full | Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays |
title_fullStr | Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays |
title_short | Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays |
title_sort | detection of chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas ct/ng v2.0 test: performance compared with the bd probetec ct q(x) and gc q(x) amplified dna and aptima ac2 assays |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nyemelindab detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT osieckijohn detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT lewinskimichael detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT liesenfeldoliver detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT youngstephen detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT taylorstephanien detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT lillisrebeccaa detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT bodybarbaraa detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT eisenhutcarol detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT hookiiiedwardw detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays AT vanderpolbarbara detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays |