Cargando…

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays

OBJECTIVES: Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are among the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections worldwide, most of which are asymptomatic. Detection of infection using a variety of specimen types in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nye, Melinda B, Osiecki, John, Lewinski, Michael, Liesenfeld, Oliver, Young, Stephen, Taylor, Stephanie N, Lillis, Rebecca A, Body, Barbara A, Eisenhut, Carol, Hook III, Edward W, Van Der Pol, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053545
_version_ 1783428084014252032
author Nye, Melinda B
Osiecki, John
Lewinski, Michael
Liesenfeld, Oliver
Young, Stephen
Taylor, Stephanie N
Lillis, Rebecca A
Body, Barbara A
Eisenhut, Carol
Hook III, Edward W
Van Der Pol, Barbara
author_facet Nye, Melinda B
Osiecki, John
Lewinski, Michael
Liesenfeld, Oliver
Young, Stephen
Taylor, Stephanie N
Lillis, Rebecca A
Body, Barbara A
Eisenhut, Carol
Hook III, Edward W
Van Der Pol, Barbara
author_sort Nye, Melinda B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are among the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections worldwide, most of which are asymptomatic. Detection of infection using a variety of specimen types in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects is important to effectively combat CT/NG infections. The performance of the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test was assessed for urogenital swabs, urine and cervical cytology samples collected in PreservCyt Solution from 5266 symptomatic and asymptomatic women (including 202 who were pregnant), and urine from 738 men. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were estimated compared with a patient infected status determined using two US Food and Drug Administration–cleared nucleic acid amplification tests. RESULTS: Among 6004 participants, 487 CT (8.1%) and 159 NG (2.6%) infections were identified. Sensitivity estimates for CT for women ranged from 91.2% to 97.6% depending on specimen type, and the estimate for male urine specimens was 98.4%. Specificity for CT ranged from 99.2% to 99.7%. Sensitivity estimates for NG ranged from 95.6% to 100.0% for women, and the estimate for men was 100.0%. Specificity for NG ranged from 99.3% to 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas CT/NG v2.0 test performs well using urogenital swabs, urine and cervical samples collected in PreservCyt solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65807692019-07-02 Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays Nye, Melinda B Osiecki, John Lewinski, Michael Liesenfeld, Oliver Young, Stephen Taylor, Stephanie N Lillis, Rebecca A Body, Barbara A Eisenhut, Carol Hook III, Edward W Van Der Pol, Barbara Sex Transm Infect Clinical OBJECTIVES: Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are among the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infections worldwide, most of which are asymptomatic. Detection of infection using a variety of specimen types in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects is important to effectively combat CT/NG infections. The performance of the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test was assessed for urogenital swabs, urine and cervical cytology samples collected in PreservCyt Solution from 5266 symptomatic and asymptomatic women (including 202 who were pregnant), and urine from 738 men. METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity were estimated compared with a patient infected status determined using two US Food and Drug Administration–cleared nucleic acid amplification tests. RESULTS: Among 6004 participants, 487 CT (8.1%) and 159 NG (2.6%) infections were identified. Sensitivity estimates for CT for women ranged from 91.2% to 97.6% depending on specimen type, and the estimate for male urine specimens was 98.4%. Specificity for CT ranged from 99.2% to 99.7%. Sensitivity estimates for NG ranged from 95.6% to 100.0% for women, and the estimate for men was 100.0%. Specificity for NG ranged from 99.3% to 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The cobas CT/NG v2.0 test performs well using urogenital swabs, urine and cervical samples collected in PreservCyt solution. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03 2018-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6580769/ /pubmed/30126947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053545 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Clinical
Nye, Melinda B
Osiecki, John
Lewinski, Michael
Liesenfeld, Oliver
Young, Stephen
Taylor, Stephanie N
Lillis, Rebecca A
Body, Barbara A
Eisenhut, Carol
Hook III, Edward W
Van Der Pol, Barbara
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
title Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
title_full Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
title_fullStr Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
title_short Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas CT/NG v2.0 test: performance compared with the BD ProbeTec CT Q(x) and GC Q(x) amplified DNA and Aptima AC2 assays
title_sort detection of chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae with the cobas ct/ng v2.0 test: performance compared with the bd probetec ct q(x) and gc q(x) amplified dna and aptima ac2 assays
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053545
work_keys_str_mv AT nyemelindab detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT osieckijohn detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT lewinskimichael detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT liesenfeldoliver detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT youngstephen detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT taylorstephanien detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT lillisrebeccaa detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT bodybarbaraa detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT eisenhutcarol detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT hookiiiedwardw detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays
AT vanderpolbarbara detectionofchlamydiatrachomatisandneisseriagonorrhoeaewiththecobasctngv20testperformancecomparedwiththebdprobetecctqxandgcqxamplifieddnaandaptimaac2assays