Cargando…

Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology

OBJECTIVE: Academic pathology is facing a crisis; an ongoing decline in academic pathology posts, a paucity of academic pathologist’s in-training and unfilled posts at a time when cellular pathology departments are challenged to deliver increasing numbers of molecular tests. The National Cancer Rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brockmoeller, Scarlet, Young, Caroline, Lee, Jessica, Arends, Mark J, Wilkins, Bridget S, Thomas, Gareth J, Oien, Karin A, Jones, Louise, Hunter, Keith D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30910824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205568
_version_ 1783428087499718656
author Brockmoeller, Scarlet
Young, Caroline
Lee, Jessica
Arends, Mark J
Wilkins, Bridget S
Thomas, Gareth J
Oien, Karin A
Jones, Louise
Hunter, Keith D
author_facet Brockmoeller, Scarlet
Young, Caroline
Lee, Jessica
Arends, Mark J
Wilkins, Bridget S
Thomas, Gareth J
Oien, Karin A
Jones, Louise
Hunter, Keith D
author_sort Brockmoeller, Scarlet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Academic pathology is facing a crisis; an ongoing decline in academic pathology posts, a paucity of academic pathologist’s in-training and unfilled posts at a time when cellular pathology departments are challenged to deliver increasing numbers of molecular tests. The National Cancer Research Institute initiative in Cellular & Molecular Pathology commissioned a survey to assess attitudes of cellular pathology consultants towards research in order to understand barriers and identify possible solutions to improve this situation. As cellular pathology is encompassing an increasing number of diagnostic molecular tests, we also surveyed the current approach to and extent of training in molecular pathology. METHODS: The survey was distributed to all UK-based consultant pathologists via the Pathological Society of Great Britain & Ireland and Royal College of Pathologist networks. Heads of Department were contacted separately to obtain figures for number of academic training and consultant posts. RESULTS: 302 cellular pathologists completed the survey which represents approximately 21% of the total cellular histopathology workforce. Most respondents (89%) had been involved in research at some point; currently, 22% were undertaking research formally, and 41% on an informal basis. Of those previously involved in research, 57% stopped early in their consultant career. The majority of substantive academic posts were Professors of which 60% had been in post for >20 years. Most respondents (84%) used molecular pathology in diagnostic work, independent of where they worked or the length of time in post. Notably, 53% of consultants had not received molecular pathology training, particularly more senior consultants and consultants in district general hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The survey reveals that the academic workforce is skewed towards senior individuals, many of whom are approaching retirement, with a missing cohort of ‘junior consultant’ academic pathologists to replace them. Most pathologists stop formal research activity at the beginning of a consultant career. While molecular pathology is an increasing part of a pathologist’s workload, the majority of consultant cellular pathologists have not received any formal molecular training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65807842019-07-02 Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology Brockmoeller, Scarlet Young, Caroline Lee, Jessica Arends, Mark J Wilkins, Bridget S Thomas, Gareth J Oien, Karin A Jones, Louise Hunter, Keith D J Clin Pathol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Academic pathology is facing a crisis; an ongoing decline in academic pathology posts, a paucity of academic pathologist’s in-training and unfilled posts at a time when cellular pathology departments are challenged to deliver increasing numbers of molecular tests. The National Cancer Research Institute initiative in Cellular & Molecular Pathology commissioned a survey to assess attitudes of cellular pathology consultants towards research in order to understand barriers and identify possible solutions to improve this situation. As cellular pathology is encompassing an increasing number of diagnostic molecular tests, we also surveyed the current approach to and extent of training in molecular pathology. METHODS: The survey was distributed to all UK-based consultant pathologists via the Pathological Society of Great Britain & Ireland and Royal College of Pathologist networks. Heads of Department were contacted separately to obtain figures for number of academic training and consultant posts. RESULTS: 302 cellular pathologists completed the survey which represents approximately 21% of the total cellular histopathology workforce. Most respondents (89%) had been involved in research at some point; currently, 22% were undertaking research formally, and 41% on an informal basis. Of those previously involved in research, 57% stopped early in their consultant career. The majority of substantive academic posts were Professors of which 60% had been in post for >20 years. Most respondents (84%) used molecular pathology in diagnostic work, independent of where they worked or the length of time in post. Notably, 53% of consultants had not received molecular pathology training, particularly more senior consultants and consultants in district general hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The survey reveals that the academic workforce is skewed towards senior individuals, many of whom are approaching retirement, with a missing cohort of ‘junior consultant’ academic pathologists to replace them. Most pathologists stop formal research activity at the beginning of a consultant career. While molecular pathology is an increasing part of a pathologist’s workload, the majority of consultant cellular pathologists have not received any formal molecular training. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6580784/ /pubmed/30910824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205568 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Brockmoeller, Scarlet
Young, Caroline
Lee, Jessica
Arends, Mark J
Wilkins, Bridget S
Thomas, Gareth J
Oien, Karin A
Jones, Louise
Hunter, Keith D
Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
title Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
title_full Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
title_fullStr Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
title_full_unstemmed Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
title_short Survey of UK histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
title_sort survey of uk histopathology consultants’ attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30910824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205568
work_keys_str_mv AT brockmoellerscarlet surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT youngcaroline surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT leejessica surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT arendsmarkj surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT wilkinsbridgets surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT thomasgarethj surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT oienkarina surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT joneslouise surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology
AT hunterkeithd surveyofukhistopathologyconsultantsattitudestowardsacademicandmolecularpathology