Cargando…
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
AIMS: Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzymes have previously been shown to have prognostic value and associate with adverse outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nrf1) and factor 2 (Nrf2) are among the principal inducer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205584 |
_version_ | 1783428088443437056 |
---|---|
author | Kari, Esa Teppo, Hanna-Riikka Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea Lemma, Aurora Karihtala, Peeter Pirinen, Risto Soini, Ylermi Jantunen, Esa Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina Kuittinen, Outi |
author_facet | Kari, Esa Teppo, Hanna-Riikka Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea Lemma, Aurora Karihtala, Peeter Pirinen, Risto Soini, Ylermi Jantunen, Esa Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina Kuittinen, Outi |
author_sort | Kari, Esa |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzymes have previously been shown to have prognostic value and associate with adverse outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nrf1) and factor 2 (Nrf2) are among the principal inducers of antioxidant enzyme production. Kelch ECH associating protein 1 (Keap1) is a negative regulator of Nrf2, and BTB (BR-C, ttk and bab) domain and CNC homolog 1 (Bach1) represses the function of both factors. Their significance in DLBCL prognosis is unknown. METHODS: Diagnostic biopsy samples of 76 patients with high-risk DLBCL were retrospectively stained with immunohistochemistry for Nrf1, Nrf2, Keap1 and Bach1, and correlated with clinical data and outcome. RESULTS: Nuclear Nrf2 and nuclear Bach1 expression were associated with adverse clinical features (anaemia, advanced stage, high IPI, high risk of neutropaenic infections), whereas cytoplasmic Nrf1 and Nrf2 were associated with favourable clinical presentation (normal haemoglobin level, no B symptoms, limited stage). None of the evaluated factors could predict survival alone. However, when two of the following parameters were combined: high nuclear score of Nrf2, low nuclear score of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic score of Nrf1 and low cytoplasmic score of Keap1 were associated with significantly worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Nrf1 and Nrf2 are relevant in disease presentation and overall survival in high-risk DLBCL. Low nuclear expression of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic expression of Nrf1, high nuclear expression of Nrf2 and low cytoplasmic expression of Keap1 are associated with adverse outcome in this patient group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6580789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65807892019-07-02 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP Kari, Esa Teppo, Hanna-Riikka Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea Lemma, Aurora Karihtala, Peeter Pirinen, Risto Soini, Ylermi Jantunen, Esa Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina Kuittinen, Outi J Clin Pathol Original Article AIMS: Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzymes have previously been shown to have prognostic value and associate with adverse outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nrf1) and factor 2 (Nrf2) are among the principal inducers of antioxidant enzyme production. Kelch ECH associating protein 1 (Keap1) is a negative regulator of Nrf2, and BTB (BR-C, ttk and bab) domain and CNC homolog 1 (Bach1) represses the function of both factors. Their significance in DLBCL prognosis is unknown. METHODS: Diagnostic biopsy samples of 76 patients with high-risk DLBCL were retrospectively stained with immunohistochemistry for Nrf1, Nrf2, Keap1 and Bach1, and correlated with clinical data and outcome. RESULTS: Nuclear Nrf2 and nuclear Bach1 expression were associated with adverse clinical features (anaemia, advanced stage, high IPI, high risk of neutropaenic infections), whereas cytoplasmic Nrf1 and Nrf2 were associated with favourable clinical presentation (normal haemoglobin level, no B symptoms, limited stage). None of the evaluated factors could predict survival alone. However, when two of the following parameters were combined: high nuclear score of Nrf2, low nuclear score of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic score of Nrf1 and low cytoplasmic score of Keap1 were associated with significantly worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Nrf1 and Nrf2 are relevant in disease presentation and overall survival in high-risk DLBCL. Low nuclear expression of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic expression of Nrf1, high nuclear expression of Nrf2 and low cytoplasmic expression of Keap1 are associated with adverse outcome in this patient group. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6580789/ /pubmed/30755497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205584 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kari, Esa Teppo, Hanna-Riikka Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea Lemma, Aurora Karihtala, Peeter Pirinen, Risto Soini, Ylermi Jantunen, Esa Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina Kuittinen, Outi Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP |
title | Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP |
title_full | Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP |
title_fullStr | Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP |
title_full_unstemmed | Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP |
title_short | Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP |
title_sort | nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large b cell lymphomas treated with r-choep |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kariesa nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT teppohannariikka nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT haapasaarikirsimaria nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT kuusistomillaelvilinnea nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT lemmaaurora nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT karihtalapeeter nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT pirinenristo nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT soiniylermi nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT jantunenesa nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT turpeenniemihujanentaina nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep AT kuittinenouti nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep |