Cargando…

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP

AIMS: Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzymes have previously been shown to have prognostic value and associate with adverse outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nrf1) and factor 2 (Nrf2) are among the principal inducer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kari, Esa, Teppo, Hanna-Riikka, Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria, Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea, Lemma, Aurora, Karihtala, Peeter, Pirinen, Risto, Soini, Ylermi, Jantunen, Esa, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina, Kuittinen, Outi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205584
_version_ 1783428088443437056
author Kari, Esa
Teppo, Hanna-Riikka
Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria
Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea
Lemma, Aurora
Karihtala, Peeter
Pirinen, Risto
Soini, Ylermi
Jantunen, Esa
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina
Kuittinen, Outi
author_facet Kari, Esa
Teppo, Hanna-Riikka
Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria
Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea
Lemma, Aurora
Karihtala, Peeter
Pirinen, Risto
Soini, Ylermi
Jantunen, Esa
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina
Kuittinen, Outi
author_sort Kari, Esa
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzymes have previously been shown to have prognostic value and associate with adverse outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nrf1) and factor 2 (Nrf2) are among the principal inducers of antioxidant enzyme production. Kelch ECH associating protein 1 (Keap1) is a negative regulator of Nrf2, and BTB (BR-C, ttk and bab) domain and CNC homolog 1 (Bach1) represses the function of both factors. Their significance in DLBCL prognosis is unknown. METHODS: Diagnostic biopsy samples of 76 patients with high-risk DLBCL were retrospectively stained with immunohistochemistry for Nrf1, Nrf2, Keap1 and Bach1, and correlated with clinical data and outcome. RESULTS: Nuclear Nrf2 and nuclear Bach1 expression were associated with adverse clinical features (anaemia, advanced stage, high IPI, high risk of neutropaenic infections), whereas cytoplasmic Nrf1 and Nrf2 were associated with favourable clinical presentation (normal haemoglobin level, no B symptoms, limited stage). None of the evaluated factors could predict survival alone. However, when two of the following parameters were combined: high nuclear score of Nrf2, low nuclear score of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic score of Nrf1 and low cytoplasmic score of Keap1 were associated with significantly worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Nrf1 and Nrf2 are relevant in disease presentation and overall survival in high-risk DLBCL. Low nuclear expression of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic expression of Nrf1, high nuclear expression of Nrf2 and low cytoplasmic expression of Keap1 are associated with adverse outcome in this patient group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65807892019-07-02 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP Kari, Esa Teppo, Hanna-Riikka Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea Lemma, Aurora Karihtala, Peeter Pirinen, Risto Soini, Ylermi Jantunen, Esa Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina Kuittinen, Outi J Clin Pathol Original Article AIMS: Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzymes have previously been shown to have prognostic value and associate with adverse outcome in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nrf1) and factor 2 (Nrf2) are among the principal inducers of antioxidant enzyme production. Kelch ECH associating protein 1 (Keap1) is a negative regulator of Nrf2, and BTB (BR-C, ttk and bab) domain and CNC homolog 1 (Bach1) represses the function of both factors. Their significance in DLBCL prognosis is unknown. METHODS: Diagnostic biopsy samples of 76 patients with high-risk DLBCL were retrospectively stained with immunohistochemistry for Nrf1, Nrf2, Keap1 and Bach1, and correlated with clinical data and outcome. RESULTS: Nuclear Nrf2 and nuclear Bach1 expression were associated with adverse clinical features (anaemia, advanced stage, high IPI, high risk of neutropaenic infections), whereas cytoplasmic Nrf1 and Nrf2 were associated with favourable clinical presentation (normal haemoglobin level, no B symptoms, limited stage). None of the evaluated factors could predict survival alone. However, when two of the following parameters were combined: high nuclear score of Nrf2, low nuclear score of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic score of Nrf1 and low cytoplasmic score of Keap1 were associated with significantly worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Nrf1 and Nrf2 are relevant in disease presentation and overall survival in high-risk DLBCL. Low nuclear expression of Nrf1, high cytoplasmic expression of Nrf1, high nuclear expression of Nrf2 and low cytoplasmic expression of Keap1 are associated with adverse outcome in this patient group. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-04 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6580789/ /pubmed/30755497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205584 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kari, Esa
Teppo, Hanna-Riikka
Haapasaari, Kirsi-Maria
Kuusisto, Milla Elvi Linnea
Lemma, Aurora
Karihtala, Peeter
Pirinen, Risto
Soini, Ylermi
Jantunen, Esa
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Taina
Kuittinen, Outi
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
title Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
title_full Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
title_fullStr Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
title_full_unstemmed Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
title_short Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with R-CHOEP
title_sort nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factors 1 and 2 are able to define the worst prognosis group among high-risk diffuse large b cell lymphomas treated with r-choep
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30755497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205584
work_keys_str_mv AT kariesa nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT teppohannariikka nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT haapasaarikirsimaria nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT kuusistomillaelvilinnea nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT lemmaaurora nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT karihtalapeeter nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT pirinenristo nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT soiniylermi nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT jantunenesa nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT turpeenniemihujanentaina nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep
AT kuittinenouti nuclearfactorerythroid2relatedfactors1and2areabletodefinetheworstprognosisgroupamonghighriskdiffuselargebcelllymphomastreatedwithrchoep