Cargando…
Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine
AIM: This study validated the RapidArc (RA) delivery using a volumetric ArcCHECK phantom as per the guidelines proposed in Task Group Report 119 from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task group 119 (AAPM TG 119). This study also investigated the impact of the Acuros XB (AXB) algori...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31359931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_118_18 |
_version_ | 1783428093539516416 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Lalit Yadav, Girigesh Kishore, Vimal Bhushan, Manindra Gairola, Munish Tripathi, Deepak |
author_facet | Kumar, Lalit Yadav, Girigesh Kishore, Vimal Bhushan, Manindra Gairola, Munish Tripathi, Deepak |
author_sort | Kumar, Lalit |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study validated the RapidArc (RA) delivery using a volumetric ArcCHECK phantom as per the guidelines proposed in Task Group Report 119 from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task group 119 (AAPM TG 119). This study also investigated the impact of the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm in comparison to analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) on the RA dose calculations in the homogeneous medium of the ArcCHECK phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A volumetric ArcCHECK phantom along with AAPM TG 119 tests was used to evaluate the RA plans and verify the dose delivery for photon beam of 6 MV energy. RESULTS: The RA planning results were comparable and satisfied the planning criteria stated in the TG 119 report for all test cases. The average percentage gamma passing rates for the AAA-calculated plans were 98.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.6), 98.5 (SD: 1.3), and 98.1 (SD: 2.0) and for the AXB-calculated plans were 95.1 (SD: 1.8), 96.1 (SD: 1.3), and 94.0 (SD: 0.9) for the Clinac-iX (6 MV) and TrueBeam (TB)-STx (6 MV_filtered beam [FB] and 6 MV_flattening filter-free beam [FFFB]), respectively. For ion chamber measurements, the average percentage dose differences for the AAA-calculated plans were 1.5 (SD: 2.5), 2.7 (SD: 1.4), and 1.4(SD: 2.7) and for AXB-calculated plans were 2.3 (SD: 1.6), 3.2 (SD: 1.5), and 2.3 (SD: 2.0) for Clinac-iX (6 MV) and TB-STx (6 MV_FB and 6 MV_FFFB), respectively. CONCLUSION: Thus, the ArcCHECK can successfully be utilized for the validation of the RA delivery. The AXB has potential to perform dose calculations comparable to those of the AAA for RA plans in the homogeneous medium of the ArcCHECK phantom. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6580814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65808142019-07-29 Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Kumar, Lalit Yadav, Girigesh Kishore, Vimal Bhushan, Manindra Gairola, Munish Tripathi, Deepak J Med Phys Technical Note AIM: This study validated the RapidArc (RA) delivery using a volumetric ArcCHECK phantom as per the guidelines proposed in Task Group Report 119 from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task group 119 (AAPM TG 119). This study also investigated the impact of the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm in comparison to analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) on the RA dose calculations in the homogeneous medium of the ArcCHECK phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A volumetric ArcCHECK phantom along with AAPM TG 119 tests was used to evaluate the RA plans and verify the dose delivery for photon beam of 6 MV energy. RESULTS: The RA planning results were comparable and satisfied the planning criteria stated in the TG 119 report for all test cases. The average percentage gamma passing rates for the AAA-calculated plans were 98.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.6), 98.5 (SD: 1.3), and 98.1 (SD: 2.0) and for the AXB-calculated plans were 95.1 (SD: 1.8), 96.1 (SD: 1.3), and 94.0 (SD: 0.9) for the Clinac-iX (6 MV) and TrueBeam (TB)-STx (6 MV_filtered beam [FB] and 6 MV_flattening filter-free beam [FFFB]), respectively. For ion chamber measurements, the average percentage dose differences for the AAA-calculated plans were 1.5 (SD: 2.5), 2.7 (SD: 1.4), and 1.4(SD: 2.7) and for AXB-calculated plans were 2.3 (SD: 1.6), 3.2 (SD: 1.5), and 2.3 (SD: 2.0) for Clinac-iX (6 MV) and TB-STx (6 MV_FB and 6 MV_FFFB), respectively. CONCLUSION: Thus, the ArcCHECK can successfully be utilized for the validation of the RA delivery. The AXB has potential to perform dose calculations comparable to those of the AAA for RA plans in the homogeneous medium of the ArcCHECK phantom. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6580814/ /pubmed/31359931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_118_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Kumar, Lalit Yadav, Girigesh Kishore, Vimal Bhushan, Manindra Gairola, Munish Tripathi, Deepak Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
title | Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
title_full | Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
title_fullStr | Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
title_short | Validation of the RapidArc Delivery System Using a Volumetric Phantom as Per Task Group Report 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
title_sort | validation of the rapidarc delivery system using a volumetric phantom as per task group report 119 of the american association of physicists in medicine |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31359931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_118_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarlalit validationoftherapidarcdeliverysystemusingavolumetricphantomaspertaskgroupreport119oftheamericanassociationofphysicistsinmedicine AT yadavgirigesh validationoftherapidarcdeliverysystemusingavolumetricphantomaspertaskgroupreport119oftheamericanassociationofphysicistsinmedicine AT kishorevimal validationoftherapidarcdeliverysystemusingavolumetricphantomaspertaskgroupreport119oftheamericanassociationofphysicistsinmedicine AT bhushanmanindra validationoftherapidarcdeliverysystemusingavolumetricphantomaspertaskgroupreport119oftheamericanassociationofphysicistsinmedicine AT gairolamunish validationoftherapidarcdeliverysystemusingavolumetricphantomaspertaskgroupreport119oftheamericanassociationofphysicistsinmedicine AT tripathideepak validationoftherapidarcdeliverysystemusingavolumetricphantomaspertaskgroupreport119oftheamericanassociationofphysicistsinmedicine |