Cargando…

Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the reference point for undertaking apheresis and evaluation of adequacy for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) engraftment. AIMS: To determine whether single platform correlates with dual platform methods in CD34+ enu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murugesan, Mohandoss, Nair, Chandran K., Nayanar, Sangeetha K., Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360010
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_83_18
_version_ 1783428095874695168
author Murugesan, Mohandoss
Nair, Chandran K.
Nayanar, Sangeetha K.
Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
author_facet Murugesan, Mohandoss
Nair, Chandran K.
Nayanar, Sangeetha K.
Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
author_sort Murugesan, Mohandoss
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the reference point for undertaking apheresis and evaluation of adequacy for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) engraftment. AIMS: To determine whether single platform correlates with dual platform methods in CD34+ enumeration using ISHAGE protocol. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of CD34 Enumeration assays on both peripheral blood and PBSC product samples using Beckman Coulter FC500 Flow Cytometer. The t test and correlation study was used to study the difference between single and dual platform methods in CD34+ enumeration. RESULTS: We present our data on 152 samples comprising 41 peripheral blood samples collected before apheresis procedure and 111 samples collected from PBSC product. We observed strong positive correlation between single and dual platform methods for CD34+ counts in peripheral blood sample (r = 0.92; P < 0.001) and PBSC product sample (r = 0.85; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our study, both single versus dual platform had similar results in CD34+ cell counts. The single platform provides rapid results with ease of procedure. Errors with dual platforms are relatively common with respect to denominator. We recommend to use mean of total leukocyte count from two different hematology analyzer to minimize variation in dual platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65808242019-07-29 Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol Murugesan, Mohandoss Nair, Chandran K. Nayanar, Sangeetha K. Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy Asian J Transfus Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the reference point for undertaking apheresis and evaluation of adequacy for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) engraftment. AIMS: To determine whether single platform correlates with dual platform methods in CD34+ enumeration using ISHAGE protocol. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of CD34 Enumeration assays on both peripheral blood and PBSC product samples using Beckman Coulter FC500 Flow Cytometer. The t test and correlation study was used to study the difference between single and dual platform methods in CD34+ enumeration. RESULTS: We present our data on 152 samples comprising 41 peripheral blood samples collected before apheresis procedure and 111 samples collected from PBSC product. We observed strong positive correlation between single and dual platform methods for CD34+ counts in peripheral blood sample (r = 0.92; P < 0.001) and PBSC product sample (r = 0.85; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our study, both single versus dual platform had similar results in CD34+ cell counts. The single platform provides rapid results with ease of procedure. Errors with dual platforms are relatively common with respect to denominator. We recommend to use mean of total leukocyte count from two different hematology analyzer to minimize variation in dual platform. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6580824/ /pubmed/31360010 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_83_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Asian Journal of Transfusion Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murugesan, Mohandoss
Nair, Chandran K.
Nayanar, Sangeetha K.
Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
title Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
title_full Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
title_fullStr Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
title_full_unstemmed Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
title_short Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
title_sort flow cytometric enumeration of cd34+ hematopoietic stem cells: a comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the international society of hematotherapy and graft engineering protocol
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31360010
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_83_18
work_keys_str_mv AT murugesanmohandoss flowcytometricenumerationofcd34hematopoieticstemcellsacomparisonbetweensingleversusdualplatformmethodologyusingtheinternationalsocietyofhematotherapyandgraftengineeringprotocol
AT nairchandrank flowcytometricenumerationofcd34hematopoieticstemcellsacomparisonbetweensingleversusdualplatformmethodologyusingtheinternationalsocietyofhematotherapyandgraftengineeringprotocol
AT nayanarsangeethak flowcytometricenumerationofcd34hematopoieticstemcellsacomparisonbetweensingleversusdualplatformmethodologyusingtheinternationalsocietyofhematotherapyandgraftengineeringprotocol
AT pentapatikalyanachakravarthy flowcytometricenumerationofcd34hematopoieticstemcellsacomparisonbetweensingleversusdualplatformmethodologyusingtheinternationalsocietyofhematotherapyandgraftengineeringprotocol