Cargando…

Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Background: For centuries coercive measures in psychiatry have been means of averting acute danger. It has been known for almost as long that these measures can lead to harm or even death to those affected. Over the past two decades the topic has increasingly been the subject of scientific discussio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kersting, Xenia A. K., Hirsch, Sophie, Steinert, Tilman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00400
_version_ 1783428114484822016
author Kersting, Xenia A. K.
Hirsch, Sophie
Steinert, Tilman
author_facet Kersting, Xenia A. K.
Hirsch, Sophie
Steinert, Tilman
author_sort Kersting, Xenia A. K.
collection PubMed
description Background: For centuries coercive measures in psychiatry have been means of averting acute danger. It has been known for almost as long that these measures can lead to harm or even death to those affected. Over the past two decades the topic has increasingly been the subject of scientific discussion and research. While the legal and ethical preconditions for coercive measures in psychiatry as well as epidemiological studies on their incidence and patients’ subjective experiences have increasingly come into focus, research on possible adverse events has lagged behind. To our knowledge there is no systematic review on the harmful or even fatal physical adverse effects of coercive interventions in psychiatry. Methods: We searched the databases PubMed and CINAHL for primary literature with a search string based on the PICO framework including key words describing different psychiatric diagnoses, coercive measures, and harms. Results: In total, 67 eligible studies (mainly case reports and case series) of very heterogeneous quality were included. Two RCTs were found reporting position-dependent cardiac deterioration, but were, however, carried out with healthy people and were characterized by a small number of cases. Death was the most frequently reported harm: cardiac arrest by chest compression in 14 studies, cardiac arrest by strangulation in 9, and pulmonary embolism in 8 studies. Further harms were, among others, venous thromboembolism and injuries. Injuries during physical restraint were reported in 0.8–4% of cases. For other kinds of coercive interventions, there are no sufficient data. Venous thromboembolism occurred in a considerable percentage of cases during mechanical restraint, also under prophylaxis. The most commonly reported coercive measure was restraint, distinguishing in mechanical restraint (43 studies), physical restraint (22 studies), bedrails (eight studies), vest restraint (7 studies), and chair restraint (6 studies). Forced medication was explicitly mentioned only in two, but seems to have occurred in nine studies. Six studies included seclusion. Conclusion: Coercive measures can lead to physical harm or even death. However, there is a significant lack of data on the incidence of such adverse events related to coercive interventions. Though reported anecdotally, physical adverse events during seclusion appear to be highly underresearched.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6580992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65809922019-06-26 Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review Kersting, Xenia A. K. Hirsch, Sophie Steinert, Tilman Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: For centuries coercive measures in psychiatry have been means of averting acute danger. It has been known for almost as long that these measures can lead to harm or even death to those affected. Over the past two decades the topic has increasingly been the subject of scientific discussion and research. While the legal and ethical preconditions for coercive measures in psychiatry as well as epidemiological studies on their incidence and patients’ subjective experiences have increasingly come into focus, research on possible adverse events has lagged behind. To our knowledge there is no systematic review on the harmful or even fatal physical adverse effects of coercive interventions in psychiatry. Methods: We searched the databases PubMed and CINAHL for primary literature with a search string based on the PICO framework including key words describing different psychiatric diagnoses, coercive measures, and harms. Results: In total, 67 eligible studies (mainly case reports and case series) of very heterogeneous quality were included. Two RCTs were found reporting position-dependent cardiac deterioration, but were, however, carried out with healthy people and were characterized by a small number of cases. Death was the most frequently reported harm: cardiac arrest by chest compression in 14 studies, cardiac arrest by strangulation in 9, and pulmonary embolism in 8 studies. Further harms were, among others, venous thromboembolism and injuries. Injuries during physical restraint were reported in 0.8–4% of cases. For other kinds of coercive interventions, there are no sufficient data. Venous thromboembolism occurred in a considerable percentage of cases during mechanical restraint, also under prophylaxis. The most commonly reported coercive measure was restraint, distinguishing in mechanical restraint (43 studies), physical restraint (22 studies), bedrails (eight studies), vest restraint (7 studies), and chair restraint (6 studies). Forced medication was explicitly mentioned only in two, but seems to have occurred in nine studies. Six studies included seclusion. Conclusion: Coercive measures can lead to physical harm or even death. However, there is a significant lack of data on the incidence of such adverse events related to coercive interventions. Though reported anecdotally, physical adverse events during seclusion appear to be highly underresearched. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6580992/ /pubmed/31244695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00400 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kersting, Hirsch and Steinert http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Kersting, Xenia A. K.
Hirsch, Sophie
Steinert, Tilman
Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
title Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
title_short Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
title_sort physical harm and death in the context of coercive measures in psychiatric patients: a systematic review
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00400
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstingxeniaak physicalharmanddeathinthecontextofcoercivemeasuresinpsychiatricpatientsasystematicreview
AT hirschsophie physicalharmanddeathinthecontextofcoercivemeasuresinpsychiatricpatientsasystematicreview
AT steinerttilman physicalharmanddeathinthecontextofcoercivemeasuresinpsychiatricpatientsasystematicreview