Cargando…
Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific
According to several computational models, novel items can create a learning mode with dynamics favorable to new learning, and not to memory retrieval. In line with that idea, a new item in a recognition test has been found to create a bias toward calling subsequent items new as well. Here, we teste...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.048488.118 |
_version_ | 1783428116811612160 |
---|---|
author | van Kesteren, Marlieke Tina Renée de Vries, Lianne Meeter, Martijn |
author_facet | van Kesteren, Marlieke Tina Renée de Vries, Lianne Meeter, Martijn |
author_sort | van Kesteren, Marlieke Tina Renée |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to several computational models, novel items can create a learning mode with dynamics favorable to new learning, and not to memory retrieval. In line with that idea, a new item in a recognition test has been found to create a bias toward calling subsequent items new as well. Here, we tested whether this bias, which we termed the afterglow effect, is indeed caused by a general learning mode, or is caused by perceptual overlap between preceding and current items. In two experiments, we show that a preceding recognition judgment biases the current one, but only if the preceding and current items are of the same perceptual category. In contrast, we did not find strong bias effects from perceptually novel fractal images, as would be predicted if novel items induce a learning mode that then biases recognition judgments. We conclude that the afterglow effect is more likely to reflect perceptual phenomena than a learning mode. We suggest how this can be reconciled with what is known about familiarity at the neural level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6581004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65810042019-07-03 Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific van Kesteren, Marlieke Tina Renée de Vries, Lianne Meeter, Martijn Learn Mem Research According to several computational models, novel items can create a learning mode with dynamics favorable to new learning, and not to memory retrieval. In line with that idea, a new item in a recognition test has been found to create a bias toward calling subsequent items new as well. Here, we tested whether this bias, which we termed the afterglow effect, is indeed caused by a general learning mode, or is caused by perceptual overlap between preceding and current items. In two experiments, we show that a preceding recognition judgment biases the current one, but only if the preceding and current items are of the same perceptual category. In contrast, we did not find strong bias effects from perceptually novel fractal images, as would be predicted if novel items induce a learning mode that then biases recognition judgments. We conclude that the afterglow effect is more likely to reflect perceptual phenomena than a learning mode. We suggest how this can be reconciled with what is known about familiarity at the neural level. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6581004/ /pubmed/31209117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.048488.118 Text en © 2019 van Kesteren et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article, published in Learning & Memory, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research van Kesteren, Marlieke Tina Renée de Vries, Lianne Meeter, Martijn Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
title | Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
title_full | Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
title_fullStr | Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
title_full_unstemmed | Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
title_short | Seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
title_sort | seeing the past: afterglow effects on familiarity judgments are category-specific |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.048488.118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vankesterenmarlieketinarenee seeingthepastaftergloweffectsonfamiliarityjudgmentsarecategoryspecific AT devrieslianne seeingthepastaftergloweffectsonfamiliarityjudgmentsarecategoryspecific AT meetermartijn seeingthepastaftergloweffectsonfamiliarityjudgmentsarecategoryspecific |