Cargando…

Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention

BACKGROUND: Interventions to modify school environments are effective in promoting young people’s health across outcomes, but mechanisms are poorly understood. We assessed mediation in a trial of the Learning Together intervention, building on the recent publication of results of effectiveness for r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonell, Chris, Allen, Elizabeth, Opondo, Charles, Warren, Emily, Elbourne, Diana Ruth, Sturgess, Joanna, Bevilacqua, Leonardo, McGowan, Jennifer, Mathiot, Anne, Viner, Russell M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-211443
_version_ 1783428137143500800
author Bonell, Chris
Allen, Elizabeth
Opondo, Charles
Warren, Emily
Elbourne, Diana Ruth
Sturgess, Joanna
Bevilacqua, Leonardo
McGowan, Jennifer
Mathiot, Anne
Viner, Russell M
author_facet Bonell, Chris
Allen, Elizabeth
Opondo, Charles
Warren, Emily
Elbourne, Diana Ruth
Sturgess, Joanna
Bevilacqua, Leonardo
McGowan, Jennifer
Mathiot, Anne
Viner, Russell M
author_sort Bonell, Chris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interventions to modify school environments are effective in promoting young people’s health across outcomes, but mechanisms are poorly understood. We assessed mediation in a trial of the Learning Together intervention, building on the recent publication of results of effectiveness for reducing bullying and benefits across secondary outcomes and generally good implementation fidelity. METHODS: Within a cluster-randomised trial involving 40 English schools, we examined student-reported and staff-reported school climate and student-reported involvement with delinquent peers at 24-month and 36-month follow-up, assessing the reliability of measures and whether these mediated health outcomes at a final follow-up. RESULTS: Response rates and reliability were good for student-reported but not staff-reported measures. The intervention increased student-reported but not staff-reported-positive school climate but, like effects on student health outcomes, these manifested only at a final follow-up. The intervention reduced student-reported contact with delinquent peers at an interim follow-up. Student-reported potential mediators measured at the interim follow-up were associated with most health outcomes at the final follow-up. Adjustment for student-reported school climate and contact with delinquent peers at the interim follow-up did not reduce the associations between trial arm and our health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite being constrained by imperfect measures and by the late manifestation of impacts on student-reported school climate undermining ability to assess mediation, our study for the first time provides tentative evidence that mediation of intervention effects via improved climate and disengagement from delinquent peers is plausible. Our study provides the first evidence from a trial that whole-school interventions may work by modifying school environments and student relationships. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10751359.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6581112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65811122019-07-05 Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention Bonell, Chris Allen, Elizabeth Opondo, Charles Warren, Emily Elbourne, Diana Ruth Sturgess, Joanna Bevilacqua, Leonardo McGowan, Jennifer Mathiot, Anne Viner, Russell M J Epidemiol Community Health Research Report BACKGROUND: Interventions to modify school environments are effective in promoting young people’s health across outcomes, but mechanisms are poorly understood. We assessed mediation in a trial of the Learning Together intervention, building on the recent publication of results of effectiveness for reducing bullying and benefits across secondary outcomes and generally good implementation fidelity. METHODS: Within a cluster-randomised trial involving 40 English schools, we examined student-reported and staff-reported school climate and student-reported involvement with delinquent peers at 24-month and 36-month follow-up, assessing the reliability of measures and whether these mediated health outcomes at a final follow-up. RESULTS: Response rates and reliability were good for student-reported but not staff-reported measures. The intervention increased student-reported but not staff-reported-positive school climate but, like effects on student health outcomes, these manifested only at a final follow-up. The intervention reduced student-reported contact with delinquent peers at an interim follow-up. Student-reported potential mediators measured at the interim follow-up were associated with most health outcomes at the final follow-up. Adjustment for student-reported school climate and contact with delinquent peers at the interim follow-up did not reduce the associations between trial arm and our health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite being constrained by imperfect measures and by the late manifestation of impacts on student-reported school climate undermining ability to assess mediation, our study for the first time provides tentative evidence that mediation of intervention effects via improved climate and disengagement from delinquent peers is plausible. Our study provides the first evidence from a trial that whole-school interventions may work by modifying school environments and student relationships. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10751359. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6581112/ /pubmed/30723088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-211443 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Report
Bonell, Chris
Allen, Elizabeth
Opondo, Charles
Warren, Emily
Elbourne, Diana Ruth
Sturgess, Joanna
Bevilacqua, Leonardo
McGowan, Jennifer
Mathiot, Anne
Viner, Russell M
Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
title Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
title_full Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
title_fullStr Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
title_full_unstemmed Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
title_short Examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
title_sort examining intervention mechanisms of action using mediation analysis within a randomised trial of a whole-school health intervention
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30723088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-211443
work_keys_str_mv AT bonellchris examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT allenelizabeth examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT opondocharles examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT warrenemily examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT elbournedianaruth examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT sturgessjoanna examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT bevilacqualeonardo examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT mcgowanjennifer examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT mathiotanne examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention
AT vinerrussellm examininginterventionmechanismsofactionusingmediationanalysiswithinarandomisedtrialofawholeschoolhealthintervention