Applying Lessons from an Inaugural Clinical Pathway to Establish a Clinical Effectiveness Program

INTRODUCTION: Clinical effectiveness (CE) programs promote standardization to reduce unnecessary variation and improve healthcare value. Best practices for successful and sustainable CE programs remain in question. We developed and implemented our inaugural clinical pathway with the aim of incorporating lessons learned in the build of a CE program at our academic children’s hospital. METHODS: The Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Heart Center and Center for Quality and Clinical Effectiveness partnered to develop and implement an inaugural clinical pathway. Project phases included team assembly, pathway development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and improvement. We ascertained Critical CE program elements by focus group discussion among a multidisciplinary panel of experts and key affected groups. Pre and postintervention compared outcomes included mechanical ventilation duration, cardiovascular intensive care unit, and total postoperative length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 30 enrolled patients (90%) completed the pathway. There was a reduction in ventilator days (mean 1.0 + 0.5 versus 1.9 + 1.3 days; P < 0.001), cardiovascular intensive care unit (mean 2.3 + 1.1 versus 4.6 + 2.1 days; P < 0.001) and postoperative length of stay (mean 5.9 + 1.6 versus 7.9 + 2.7 days; P < 0.001) compared with the preintervention period. Elements deemed critical included (1) project prioritization for maximal return on investment; (2) multidisciplinary involvement; (3) pathway focus on best practices, critical outcomes, and rate-limiting steps; (4) active and flexible implementation; and (5) continuous data-driven and transparent pathway iteration. CONCLUSIONS: We identified multiple elements of successful pathway implementation, that we believe to be critical foundational elements of our CE program.