Cargando…
A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease
Background and Aims: Intestinal dysbiosis is implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease (CD). We evaluated fecal and sera microbial markers for clinical use in detecting CD. Methods: Fecal samples from 346 Asian subjects were collected, including 95 patients with CD, 81 patients with ulcerati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01306 |
_version_ | 1783428186526187520 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Songhe Lu, Yongfan Xu, Banglao Wang, Wan Xu, Jianhua Zhang, Ge |
author_facet | Guo, Songhe Lu, Yongfan Xu, Banglao Wang, Wan Xu, Jianhua Zhang, Ge |
author_sort | Guo, Songhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Aims: Intestinal dysbiosis is implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease (CD). We evaluated fecal and sera microbial markers for clinical use in detecting CD. Methods: Fecal samples from 346 Asian subjects were collected, including 95 patients with CD, 81 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 65 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and 105 healthy subjects (HS). Microbial indicators Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Fp), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) were identified based on a review of the literature. The relative abundance of the three bacterial markers were measured by qPCR, and two serological microbial markers (anti-Fn, anti-E. coli) were measured by ELISA. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of these microbial markers by ROC curve analysis. Results: The quantification of Fp, Fn, and E. coli of fecal samples is relatively stable when stored up to 6 h at room temperature. The significant increasing abundances of Fn were accompanied by a decline of Fp in the CD group. Fn exhibited a slightly higher diagnostic value than Fp in distinguishing CD from HS (Area Under Curve, AUC = 0.841 vs. 0.811) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) groups (AUC = 0.767 vs. 0.658), and the further combination of Fn and Fp improved the diagnostic value (HS, AUC = 0.867; IBS, AUC = 0.771). However, anti-E. coli and anti-Fn antibodies in serum did not possess diagnostic value for CD or UC. Conclusion: A combination of fecal Fn and Fp was identified as a valuable marker for CD diagnosis. A CD bacterial marker panel may provide a simple non-invasive approach to screen for CD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6581672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65816722019-06-26 A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease Guo, Songhe Lu, Yongfan Xu, Banglao Wang, Wan Xu, Jianhua Zhang, Ge Front Microbiol Microbiology Background and Aims: Intestinal dysbiosis is implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease (CD). We evaluated fecal and sera microbial markers for clinical use in detecting CD. Methods: Fecal samples from 346 Asian subjects were collected, including 95 patients with CD, 81 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 65 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and 105 healthy subjects (HS). Microbial indicators Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Fp), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) were identified based on a review of the literature. The relative abundance of the three bacterial markers were measured by qPCR, and two serological microbial markers (anti-Fn, anti-E. coli) were measured by ELISA. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of these microbial markers by ROC curve analysis. Results: The quantification of Fp, Fn, and E. coli of fecal samples is relatively stable when stored up to 6 h at room temperature. The significant increasing abundances of Fn were accompanied by a decline of Fp in the CD group. Fn exhibited a slightly higher diagnostic value than Fp in distinguishing CD from HS (Area Under Curve, AUC = 0.841 vs. 0.811) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) groups (AUC = 0.767 vs. 0.658), and the further combination of Fn and Fp improved the diagnostic value (HS, AUC = 0.867; IBS, AUC = 0.771). However, anti-E. coli and anti-Fn antibodies in serum did not possess diagnostic value for CD or UC. Conclusion: A combination of fecal Fn and Fp was identified as a valuable marker for CD diagnosis. A CD bacterial marker panel may provide a simple non-invasive approach to screen for CD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6581672/ /pubmed/31244813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01306 Text en Copyright © 2019 Guo, Lu, Xu, Wang, Xu and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Guo, Songhe Lu, Yongfan Xu, Banglao Wang, Wan Xu, Jianhua Zhang, Ge A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease |
title | A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease |
title_full | A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease |
title_fullStr | A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease |
title_short | A Simple Fecal Bacterial Marker Panel for the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease |
title_sort | simple fecal bacterial marker panel for the diagnosis of crohn’s disease |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244813 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guosonghe asimplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT luyongfan asimplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT xubanglao asimplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT wangwan asimplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT xujianhua asimplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT zhangge asimplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT guosonghe simplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT luyongfan simplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT xubanglao simplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT wangwan simplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT xujianhua simplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease AT zhangge simplefecalbacterialmarkerpanelforthediagnosisofcrohnsdisease |