Cargando…

Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage

Ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies present one approach to counter the challenges of demographic change in terms of an aging population, rising care needs, and lacking care personnel by supporting (older) people in need of care and enabling a longer and more independent staying at own home....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Offermann-van Heek, Julia, Ziefle, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00134
_version_ 1783428200859172864
author Offermann-van Heek, Julia
Ziefle, Martina
author_facet Offermann-van Heek, Julia
Ziefle, Martina
author_sort Offermann-van Heek, Julia
collection PubMed
description Ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies present one approach to counter the challenges of demographic change in terms of an aging population, rising care needs, and lacking care personnel by supporting (older) people in need of care and enabling a longer and more independent staying at own home. Although the number of studies focusing on AAL users' acceptance and perception has increased in the last years, trade-off decisions—the weighing of perceived benefits and barriers of technology usage—have not been studied so far. Nevertheless, this is of high relevance: A realistic evaluation of adoption behaviors in different stakeholders (patients, care personnel) requires an understanding of exactly the weighing process of benefits against the barriers in line with the decision of the final willingness to use AAL technology. The current study applied a conjoint analysis approach and investigates people's decision behavior to use an AAL system for a family member in need of care. Study participants (n = 140) had to decide between realistic care scenarios consisting of different options of two benefits (increase in safety, relief of caring burden of relatives) and two barriers (access to personal data and data handling) of technology usage. Results revealed data access and privacy to be most relevant for the decision to use AAL technology at home. However, care experience essentially influenced the decision patterns. For the care experienced group, data access should be limited to most trusted persons and close relatives, rather than to medical professionals. The most important reasons to use AAL are the emotional relief and the felt safety for the person in care. For care novices, in contrast, data access should be in the exclusive responsibility of medical professionals. The reasons that militate in favor of using AAL technology are the increase in process efficiency and medical safety. The results are useful to develop user-tailored technology concepts and derive user-specific communication guidelines within and across clinical and home care contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6581733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65817332019-06-26 Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage Offermann-van Heek, Julia Ziefle, Martina Front Public Health Public Health Ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies present one approach to counter the challenges of demographic change in terms of an aging population, rising care needs, and lacking care personnel by supporting (older) people in need of care and enabling a longer and more independent staying at own home. Although the number of studies focusing on AAL users' acceptance and perception has increased in the last years, trade-off decisions—the weighing of perceived benefits and barriers of technology usage—have not been studied so far. Nevertheless, this is of high relevance: A realistic evaluation of adoption behaviors in different stakeholders (patients, care personnel) requires an understanding of exactly the weighing process of benefits against the barriers in line with the decision of the final willingness to use AAL technology. The current study applied a conjoint analysis approach and investigates people's decision behavior to use an AAL system for a family member in need of care. Study participants (n = 140) had to decide between realistic care scenarios consisting of different options of two benefits (increase in safety, relief of caring burden of relatives) and two barriers (access to personal data and data handling) of technology usage. Results revealed data access and privacy to be most relevant for the decision to use AAL technology at home. However, care experience essentially influenced the decision patterns. For the care experienced group, data access should be limited to most trusted persons and close relatives, rather than to medical professionals. The most important reasons to use AAL are the emotional relief and the felt safety for the person in care. For care novices, in contrast, data access should be in the exclusive responsibility of medical professionals. The reasons that militate in favor of using AAL technology are the increase in process efficiency and medical safety. The results are useful to develop user-tailored technology concepts and derive user-specific communication guidelines within and across clinical and home care contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6581733/ /pubmed/31245342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00134 Text en Copyright © 2019 Offermann-van Heek and Ziefle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Offermann-van Heek, Julia
Ziefle, Martina
Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
title Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
title_full Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
title_fullStr Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
title_full_unstemmed Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
title_short Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
title_sort nothing else matters! trade-offs between perceived benefits and barriers of aal technology usage
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00134
work_keys_str_mv AT offermannvanheekjulia nothingelsematterstradeoffsbetweenperceivedbenefitsandbarriersofaaltechnologyusage
AT zieflemartina nothingelsematterstradeoffsbetweenperceivedbenefitsandbarriersofaaltechnologyusage