Cargando…

IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing

Liquid biopsy testing is a new laboratory-based method that detects tumour mutations in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) derived from minimally invasive blood sampling techniques. Recognising the significance for clinical testing, in 2017, IQN Path provided external quality assessment for liquid biopsy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deans, Zandra C., Butler, Rachel, Cheetham, Melanie, Dequeker, Elisabeth M. C., Fairley, Jennifer A., Fenizia, Francesca, Hall, Jacqueline A., Keppens, Cleo, Normanno, Nicola, Schuuring, Ed, Patton, Simon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31028539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02571-3
_version_ 1783428244408631296
author Deans, Zandra C.
Butler, Rachel
Cheetham, Melanie
Dequeker, Elisabeth M. C.
Fairley, Jennifer A.
Fenizia, Francesca
Hall, Jacqueline A.
Keppens, Cleo
Normanno, Nicola
Schuuring, Ed
Patton, Simon J.
author_facet Deans, Zandra C.
Butler, Rachel
Cheetham, Melanie
Dequeker, Elisabeth M. C.
Fairley, Jennifer A.
Fenizia, Francesca
Hall, Jacqueline A.
Keppens, Cleo
Normanno, Nicola
Schuuring, Ed
Patton, Simon J.
author_sort Deans, Zandra C.
collection PubMed
description Liquid biopsy testing is a new laboratory-based method that detects tumour mutations in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) derived from minimally invasive blood sampling techniques. Recognising the significance for clinical testing, in 2017, IQN Path provided external quality assessment for liquid biopsy testing. Representatives of those participating laboratories were invited to attend a workshop to discuss the findings and how to achieve quality implementation of cfDNA testing in the clinical setting, the discussion and outcomes of this consensus meeting are described below. Predictive molecular profiling using tumour tissue in order to select cancer patients eligible for targeted therapy is now routine in diagnostic pathology. If insufficient tumour tissue material is available, in some circumstances, recent European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance recommends mutation testing with plasma cfDNA. Clinical applications of cfDNA include treatment selection based on clinically relevant mutations derived from pre-treatment samples and the detection of resistant mutations upon progression of the disease. In order to identify tumour-related mutations in amongst other nucleic acid material found in plasma samples, highly sensitive laboratory methods are needed. In the workshop, we discussed the variable approaches taken with regard to cfDNA extraction methods, the tests, and considered the impact of false-negative test results. We explored the lack of standardisation of complex testing procedures ranging from plasma collection, transport, processing and storage, cfDNA extraction, and mutation analysis, to interpretation and reporting of results. We will also address the current status of clinical validation and clinical utility, and its use in current diagnosis. This workshop revealed a need for guidelines on with standardised procedures for clinical cfDNA testing and reporting, and a requirement for cfDNA-based external quality assessment programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6581928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65819282019-07-05 IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing Deans, Zandra C. Butler, Rachel Cheetham, Melanie Dequeker, Elisabeth M. C. Fairley, Jennifer A. Fenizia, Francesca Hall, Jacqueline A. Keppens, Cleo Normanno, Nicola Schuuring, Ed Patton, Simon J. Virchows Arch Original Article Liquid biopsy testing is a new laboratory-based method that detects tumour mutations in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) derived from minimally invasive blood sampling techniques. Recognising the significance for clinical testing, in 2017, IQN Path provided external quality assessment for liquid biopsy testing. Representatives of those participating laboratories were invited to attend a workshop to discuss the findings and how to achieve quality implementation of cfDNA testing in the clinical setting, the discussion and outcomes of this consensus meeting are described below. Predictive molecular profiling using tumour tissue in order to select cancer patients eligible for targeted therapy is now routine in diagnostic pathology. If insufficient tumour tissue material is available, in some circumstances, recent European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance recommends mutation testing with plasma cfDNA. Clinical applications of cfDNA include treatment selection based on clinically relevant mutations derived from pre-treatment samples and the detection of resistant mutations upon progression of the disease. In order to identify tumour-related mutations in amongst other nucleic acid material found in plasma samples, highly sensitive laboratory methods are needed. In the workshop, we discussed the variable approaches taken with regard to cfDNA extraction methods, the tests, and considered the impact of false-negative test results. We explored the lack of standardisation of complex testing procedures ranging from plasma collection, transport, processing and storage, cfDNA extraction, and mutation analysis, to interpretation and reporting of results. We will also address the current status of clinical validation and clinical utility, and its use in current diagnosis. This workshop revealed a need for guidelines on with standardised procedures for clinical cfDNA testing and reporting, and a requirement for cfDNA-based external quality assessment programs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6581928/ /pubmed/31028539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02571-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Deans, Zandra C.
Butler, Rachel
Cheetham, Melanie
Dequeker, Elisabeth M. C.
Fairley, Jennifer A.
Fenizia, Francesca
Hall, Jacqueline A.
Keppens, Cleo
Normanno, Nicola
Schuuring, Ed
Patton, Simon J.
IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing
title IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing
title_full IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing
title_fullStr IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing
title_full_unstemmed IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing
title_short IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing
title_sort iqn path asbl report from the first european cfdna consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctdna testing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31028539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02571-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deanszandrac iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT butlerrachel iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT cheethammelanie iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT dequekerelisabethmc iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT fairleyjennifera iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT feniziafrancesca iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT halljacquelinea iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT keppenscleo iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT normannonicola iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT schuuringed iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting
AT pattonsimonj iqnpathasblreportfromthefirsteuropeancfdnaconsensusmeetingexpertopinionontheminimalrequirementsforclinicalctdnatesting