Cargando…
Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5 |
_version_ | 1783428245354446848 |
---|---|
author | Sosna, Magdalena Tacikowska, Grażyna Pietrasik, Katarzyna Skarżyński, Henryk Lorens, Artur Skarżyński, Piotr H. |
author_facet | Sosna, Magdalena Tacikowska, Grażyna Pietrasik, Katarzyna Skarżyński, Henryk Lorens, Artur Skarżyński, Piotr H. |
author_sort | Sosna, Magdalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of the study is to assess postoperative vestibular function after partial deafness treatment–electro-acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) cochlear implantation. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study (30 females, 25 males, age 11–80, mean 41.8 ± 19.35). cVEMP and oVEMP were performed preoperatively and 1–3 months after cochlear implantation. Caloric and vHIT tests were conducted preoperatively and 4–6 months after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Our study shows that, based on a wide range of electrodes, use of PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. It gives a rate of saccular damage of 15.79%, utricular damage of 19.04%, and a horizontal semicircular canal response reduction of 15.79%. CONCLUSIONS: PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the risk of vestibular damage cannot be totally eliminated even when hearing preservation techniques are adopted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6581932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65819322019-07-05 Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) Sosna, Magdalena Tacikowska, Grażyna Pietrasik, Katarzyna Skarżyński, Henryk Lorens, Artur Skarżyński, Piotr H. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of the study is to assess postoperative vestibular function after partial deafness treatment–electro-acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) cochlear implantation. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study (30 females, 25 males, age 11–80, mean 41.8 ± 19.35). cVEMP and oVEMP were performed preoperatively and 1–3 months after cochlear implantation. Caloric and vHIT tests were conducted preoperatively and 4–6 months after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Our study shows that, based on a wide range of electrodes, use of PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. It gives a rate of saccular damage of 15.79%, utricular damage of 19.04%, and a horizontal semicircular canal response reduction of 15.79%. CONCLUSIONS: PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the risk of vestibular damage cannot be totally eliminated even when hearing preservation techniques are adopted. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6581932/ /pubmed/31053967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Otology Sosna, Magdalena Tacikowska, Grażyna Pietrasik, Katarzyna Skarżyński, Henryk Lorens, Artur Skarżyński, Piotr H. Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) |
title | Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) |
title_full | Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) |
title_fullStr | Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) |
title_short | Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) |
title_sort | effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (pdt–eas) |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sosnamagdalena effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas AT tacikowskagrazyna effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas AT pietrasikkatarzyna effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas AT skarzynskihenryk effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas AT lorensartur effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas AT skarzynskipiotrh effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas |