Cargando…

Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)

PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sosna, Magdalena, Tacikowska, Grażyna, Pietrasik, Katarzyna, Skarżyński, Henryk, Lorens, Artur, Skarżyński, Piotr H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5
_version_ 1783428245354446848
author Sosna, Magdalena
Tacikowska, Grażyna
Pietrasik, Katarzyna
Skarżyński, Henryk
Lorens, Artur
Skarżyński, Piotr H.
author_facet Sosna, Magdalena
Tacikowska, Grażyna
Pietrasik, Katarzyna
Skarżyński, Henryk
Lorens, Artur
Skarżyński, Piotr H.
author_sort Sosna, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of the study is to assess postoperative vestibular function after partial deafness treatment–electro-acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) cochlear implantation. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study (30 females, 25 males, age 11–80, mean 41.8 ± 19.35). cVEMP and oVEMP were performed preoperatively and 1–3 months after cochlear implantation. Caloric and vHIT tests were conducted preoperatively and 4–6 months after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Our study shows that, based on a wide range of electrodes, use of PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. It gives a rate of saccular damage of 15.79%, utricular damage of 19.04%, and a horizontal semicircular canal response reduction of 15.79%. CONCLUSIONS: PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the risk of vestibular damage cannot be totally eliminated even when hearing preservation techniques are adopted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6581932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65819322019-07-05 Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) Sosna, Magdalena Tacikowska, Grażyna Pietrasik, Katarzyna Skarżyński, Henryk Lorens, Artur Skarżyński, Piotr H. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Although the cochlear implantation procedure does not interfere with vestibular structures directly, both the vestibulum and the cochlea share the same inner ear fluid space, and this fluid may be responsible for transferring possibly damaging forces from one to the other. The purpose of the study is to assess postoperative vestibular function after partial deafness treatment–electro-acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS) cochlear implantation. METHODS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study (30 females, 25 males, age 11–80, mean 41.8 ± 19.35). cVEMP and oVEMP were performed preoperatively and 1–3 months after cochlear implantation. Caloric and vHIT tests were conducted preoperatively and 4–6 months after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: Our study shows that, based on a wide range of electrodes, use of PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. It gives a rate of saccular damage of 15.79%, utricular damage of 19.04%, and a horizontal semicircular canal response reduction of 15.79%. CONCLUSIONS: PDT–EAS is protective in terms of preserving vestibular function. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the risk of vestibular damage cannot be totally eliminated even when hearing preservation techniques are adopted. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6581932/ /pubmed/31053967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Otology
Sosna, Magdalena
Tacikowska, Grażyna
Pietrasik, Katarzyna
Skarżyński, Henryk
Lorens, Artur
Skarżyński, Piotr H.
Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
title Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
title_full Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
title_fullStr Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
title_full_unstemmed Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
title_short Effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (PDT–EAS)
title_sort effect on vestibular function of cochlear implantation by partial deafness treatment–electro acoustic stimulation (pdt–eas)
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05425-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sosnamagdalena effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas
AT tacikowskagrazyna effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas
AT pietrasikkatarzyna effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas
AT skarzynskihenryk effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas
AT lorensartur effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas
AT skarzynskipiotrh effectonvestibularfunctionofcochlearimplantationbypartialdeafnesstreatmentelectroacousticstimulationpdteas