Cargando…

Psychometric evaluation of a parent-rating and self-rating inventory for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: German OCD Inventory for Children and Adolescents (OCD-CA)

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the psychometric properties of the German version of the Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision for measuring pediatric OCD. METHODS: The parent-rating and self-rating inventory is assessed in a clinical sample (CLIN: n = 342, age range = 6–18 years) com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adam, Julia, Goletz, Hildegard, Mattausch, Svenja-Kristin, Plück, Julia, Döpfner, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-019-0286-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study assesses the psychometric properties of the German version of the Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision for measuring pediatric OCD. METHODS: The parent-rating and self-rating inventory is assessed in a clinical sample (CLIN: n = 342, age range = 6–18 years) comprising an OCD subsample (OCDS: n = 181) and a non-OCD clinical subsample (non-OCD: n = 161), and in a community sample (COS: n = 367, age range = 11–18 years). RESULTS: An exploratory factor analysis yielded a four-factor solution: (1) Contamination & Washing, (2) Catastrophes & Injuries, (3) Checking, and (4) Ordering & Repeating. Internal consistencies of the respective scales were acceptable to excellent across all samples, with the exception of the self-report subscale Ordering and Repeating in the community sample. The subscales correlated highly with the total score. Intercorrelations between the subscales were mainly r ≤ .70, indicating that the subscales were sufficiently independent of each other. Convergent and divergent validity was supported. Participants in the OCD subsample scored significantly higher than those in the non-OCD clinical subsample and the COS on all scales. In the COS, self-rating scores were significantly higher than parent-rating scores on all scales, while significant mean differences between informants were only found on two subscales in the OCD subsample. CONCLUSION: The German version of the Padua Inventory-Washington State University Revision for measuring pediatric OCD is a promising, valid and reliable instrument to assess self-rated and parent-rated pediatric OCD symptoms in clinical and non-clinical (community) populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13034-019-0286-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.