Cargando…
Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock
BACKGROUND: Although invasively measured blood pressure (invBP) is regarded as a “gold standard” in critically ill cardiac patients, the non-invasive BP is still widely used, at least at the initiation of medical care. The erroneous interpretation of BP can lead to clinical errors. We therefore inve...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1129-9 |
_version_ | 1783428344034885632 |
---|---|
author | Seidlerová, Jitka Tůmová, Pavlína Rokyta, Richard Hromadka, Milan |
author_facet | Seidlerová, Jitka Tůmová, Pavlína Rokyta, Richard Hromadka, Milan |
author_sort | Seidlerová, Jitka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although invasively measured blood pressure (invBP) is regarded as a “gold standard” in critically ill cardiac patients, the non-invasive BP is still widely used, at least at the initiation of medical care. The erroneous interpretation of BP can lead to clinical errors. We therefore investigated the agreement of both methods with respect to some common clinical situation. METHODS: We included 85 patients hospitalized for cardiogenic shock. We measured BP every 6 h for the first 72 h of hospitalization, in all patients. Each set of BP measurements included two invasive (invBP), two auscultatory (auscBP), and two oscillometric (oscBP) BP measurements. InvBP was considered as a gold standard. Mean non-invasive arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as (diastolic pressure + (pulse pressure ÷ 3)). We used Bland-Altman analysis and we calculated concordance correlation coefficients to assess agreement between different BP methods. RESULTS: We obtained 967 sets of BP measurements. AuscMAP and oscMAP were on average only 0.4 ± 8.2 and 1.8 ± 8.5 mmHg higher than invMAP, respectively. On the other hand, auscSBP and oscSBP were on average − 6.1 ± 11.4 and − 4.1 ± 9.8 mmHg lower than invSBP, respectively. However, the mean differences and variability for systolic and diastolic BP variability were large; the 2 standard deviation differences were ± 24 and 18 mmHg. In hypotension, non-invasive BP tended to be higher than invBP while the opposite was true for high BP values. Clinical conditions associated with hypotension generally worsened the accuracy of non-invasive MAP. CONCLUSIONS: Mean arterial pressure measured non-invasively appears to be in good agreement with invasive MAP in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock. Several clinical associated with hypotension can affect accuracy of non-invasive measurement. Auscultatory and oscillometric measurements had similar accuracy even in patients with arrhythmia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1129-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6582540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65825402019-06-26 Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock Seidlerová, Jitka Tůmová, Pavlína Rokyta, Richard Hromadka, Milan BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although invasively measured blood pressure (invBP) is regarded as a “gold standard” in critically ill cardiac patients, the non-invasive BP is still widely used, at least at the initiation of medical care. The erroneous interpretation of BP can lead to clinical errors. We therefore investigated the agreement of both methods with respect to some common clinical situation. METHODS: We included 85 patients hospitalized for cardiogenic shock. We measured BP every 6 h for the first 72 h of hospitalization, in all patients. Each set of BP measurements included two invasive (invBP), two auscultatory (auscBP), and two oscillometric (oscBP) BP measurements. InvBP was considered as a gold standard. Mean non-invasive arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as (diastolic pressure + (pulse pressure ÷ 3)). We used Bland-Altman analysis and we calculated concordance correlation coefficients to assess agreement between different BP methods. RESULTS: We obtained 967 sets of BP measurements. AuscMAP and oscMAP were on average only 0.4 ± 8.2 and 1.8 ± 8.5 mmHg higher than invMAP, respectively. On the other hand, auscSBP and oscSBP were on average − 6.1 ± 11.4 and − 4.1 ± 9.8 mmHg lower than invSBP, respectively. However, the mean differences and variability for systolic and diastolic BP variability were large; the 2 standard deviation differences were ± 24 and 18 mmHg. In hypotension, non-invasive BP tended to be higher than invBP while the opposite was true for high BP values. Clinical conditions associated with hypotension generally worsened the accuracy of non-invasive MAP. CONCLUSIONS: Mean arterial pressure measured non-invasively appears to be in good agreement with invasive MAP in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock. Several clinical associated with hypotension can affect accuracy of non-invasive measurement. Auscultatory and oscillometric measurements had similar accuracy even in patients with arrhythmia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1129-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6582540/ /pubmed/31215405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1129-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seidlerová, Jitka Tůmová, Pavlína Rokyta, Richard Hromadka, Milan Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
title | Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
title_full | Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
title_short | Factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
title_sort | factors influencing the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1129-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seidlerovajitka factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofnoninvasivebloodpressuremeasurementsinpatientsadmittedforcardiogenicshock AT tumovapavlina factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofnoninvasivebloodpressuremeasurementsinpatientsadmittedforcardiogenicshock AT rokytarichard factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofnoninvasivebloodpressuremeasurementsinpatientsadmittedforcardiogenicshock AT hromadkamilan factorsinfluencingtheaccuracyofnoninvasivebloodpressuremeasurementsinpatientsadmittedforcardiogenicshock |