Cargando…
An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), wher...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009 |
_version_ | 1783428365395427328 |
---|---|
author | Snell, Joshua Meade, Gabriela Meeter, Martijn Holcomb, Phillip Grainger, Jonathan |
author_facet | Snell, Joshua Meade, Gabriela Meeter, Martijn Holcomb, Phillip Grainger, Jonathan |
author_sort | Snell, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6582630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65826302019-06-24 An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading Snell, Joshua Meade, Gabriela Meeter, Martijn Holcomb, Phillip Grainger, Jonathan Neuropsychologia Article During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated. Pergamon Press 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6582630/ /pubmed/31002854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Snell, Joshua Meade, Gabriela Meeter, Martijn Holcomb, Phillip Grainger, Jonathan An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
title | An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
title_full | An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
title_fullStr | An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
title_full_unstemmed | An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
title_short | An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
title_sort | electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT snelljoshua anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT meadegabriela anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT meetermartijn anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT holcombphillip anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT graingerjonathan anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT snelljoshua electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT meadegabriela electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT meetermartijn electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT holcombphillip electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading AT graingerjonathan electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading |