Cargando…

An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading

During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), wher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snell, Joshua, Meade, Gabriela, Meeter, Martijn, Holcomb, Phillip, Grainger, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009
_version_ 1783428365395427328
author Snell, Joshua
Meade, Gabriela
Meeter, Martijn
Holcomb, Phillip
Grainger, Jonathan
author_facet Snell, Joshua
Meade, Gabriela
Meeter, Martijn
Holcomb, Phillip
Grainger, Jonathan
author_sort Snell, Joshua
collection PubMed
description During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6582630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65826302019-06-24 An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading Snell, Joshua Meade, Gabriela Meeter, Martijn Holcomb, Phillip Grainger, Jonathan Neuropsychologia Article During reading, word recognition speed is influenced by the amount of orthographic overlap with surrounding words. The nature of this phenomenon is not understood: some theories attribute it to low-level visual operations (i.e., parafoveal feature detectors influencing foveal letter detectors), whereas other theories assume that orthographic processing (i.e., letter position coding and word activation) occurs across multiple words in parallel. To arbitrate between these theories, we used electroencephalography to reveal the time course of orthographic spatial integration in a lexical decision task. Foveal target words were flanked on each side by parafoveal words, manipulated across three conditions: repetition flankers (e.g. rock rock rock), unrelated flankers (step rock step) and a no-flanker condition. Linear mixed-effect models were constructed to analyze EEG data on a trial-by-trial basis. Word recognition was worse in the unrelated flanker condition than in the repetition and no-flanker conditions. This behavioral pattern was accompanied by increased negativity in the N250 and N400 windows, associated with the activation of sub-lexical and lexico-semantic representations, respectively. Crucially, the absence of effects prior to 200 ms post-stimulus onset provides evidence against the involvement of low-level visual processes. We conclude that orthographic spatial integration is driven by parallel processing of multiple words, which leads to the activation of a larger set of sub-lexical nodes and more difficult processing at the lexical level when those words are orthographically unrelated. Pergamon Press 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6582630/ /pubmed/31002854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Snell, Joshua
Meade, Gabriela
Meeter, Martijn
Holcomb, Phillip
Grainger, Jonathan
An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
title An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
title_full An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
title_fullStr An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
title_full_unstemmed An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
title_short An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
title_sort electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT snelljoshua anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT meadegabriela anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT meetermartijn anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT holcombphillip anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT graingerjonathan anelectrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT snelljoshua electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT meadegabriela electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT meetermartijn electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT holcombphillip electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading
AT graingerjonathan electrophysiologicalinvestigationoforthographicspatialintegrationinreading