Cargando…

Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters

OBJECTIVE(S): Malignant ascites (MA) is abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity and has negative effects on the quality of life. The purpose of this retrospective study is to explore feasibility, safety and efficacy of tunneled peritoneal catheter placement using both peritoneal dial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaya, Ahmet, Nas, Omer F., Erdogan, Cuneyt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4132396
_version_ 1783428414404820992
author Kaya, Ahmet
Nas, Omer F.
Erdogan, Cuneyt
author_facet Kaya, Ahmet
Nas, Omer F.
Erdogan, Cuneyt
author_sort Kaya, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): Malignant ascites (MA) is abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity and has negative effects on the quality of life. The purpose of this retrospective study is to explore feasibility, safety and efficacy of tunneled peritoneal catheter placement using both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis catheters in the palliation of MA. METHODS: Between October 2013-June 2016, thirty patients with resistent MA underwent tunneled peritoneal catheterisation in our interventional radiology department. Tunneled peritoneal catheter (TPC) was placed in 22 (n=22/30; %73) patients, tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) was placed in 8 patients (n=8/30; %27). Routine visits were scheduled for months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 of the catheterization, and the records were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall duration of catheterization varied from 2 to 334 days (mean 66.4 ± 68.5, median: 57 days). Catheters remained intact in 29 patients (96.7%) until the endpoint. There was one (3.3%) malfunctioning catheter among both groups. Overall, four patients developed infection, which were classified into major (n=2/30, %6.7) and minor (n=2/30, %6.7) complications according to SIR criteria. CONCLUSION: Tunneled peritoneal catheterization using both TPCs and THCs provided a safe method with relatively high patency, and low infection and systemic complication rates in the palliation of MA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6582866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65828662019-07-04 Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters Kaya, Ahmet Nas, Omer F. Erdogan, Cuneyt Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE(S): Malignant ascites (MA) is abnormal accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity and has negative effects on the quality of life. The purpose of this retrospective study is to explore feasibility, safety and efficacy of tunneled peritoneal catheter placement using both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis catheters in the palliation of MA. METHODS: Between October 2013-June 2016, thirty patients with resistent MA underwent tunneled peritoneal catheterisation in our interventional radiology department. Tunneled peritoneal catheter (TPC) was placed in 22 (n=22/30; %73) patients, tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) was placed in 8 patients (n=8/30; %27). Routine visits were scheduled for months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 of the catheterization, and the records were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall duration of catheterization varied from 2 to 334 days (mean 66.4 ± 68.5, median: 57 days). Catheters remained intact in 29 patients (96.7%) until the endpoint. There was one (3.3%) malfunctioning catheter among both groups. Overall, four patients developed infection, which were classified into major (n=2/30, %6.7) and minor (n=2/30, %6.7) complications according to SIR criteria. CONCLUSION: Tunneled peritoneal catheterization using both TPCs and THCs provided a safe method with relatively high patency, and low infection and systemic complication rates in the palliation of MA. Hindawi 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6582866/ /pubmed/31275969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4132396 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ahmet Kaya et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaya, Ahmet
Nas, Omer F.
Erdogan, Cuneyt
Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters
title Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters
title_full Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters
title_fullStr Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters
title_full_unstemmed Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters
title_short Tunneled Peritoneal Catheter Placement in Palliation of Malignant Ascites: A Study with Two Different Types of Catheters
title_sort tunneled peritoneal catheter placement in palliation of malignant ascites: a study with two different types of catheters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4132396
work_keys_str_mv AT kayaahmet tunneledperitonealcatheterplacementinpalliationofmalignantascitesastudywithtwodifferenttypesofcatheters
AT nasomerf tunneledperitonealcatheterplacementinpalliationofmalignantascitesastudywithtwodifferenttypesofcatheters
AT erdogancuneyt tunneledperitonealcatheterplacementinpalliationofmalignantascitesastudywithtwodifferenttypesofcatheters