Cargando…
Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse differen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6318429 |
_version_ | 1783428417694203904 |
---|---|
author | Schupbach, Peter Glauser, Roland Bauer, Sebastian |
author_facet | Schupbach, Peter Glauser, Roland Bauer, Sebastian |
author_sort | Schupbach, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse different commercially available implant systems with a SA-modified surface and to explore the widespread notion that they have similar surface properties regarding morphology and cleanliness. SA-modified surfaces of nine implant systems manufactured by Alpha-Bio Tec Ltd, Camlog Biotechnologies AG, Dentsply Sirona Dental GmbH, Neoss Ltd, Osstem Implant Co. Ltd, Institute Straumann AG, and Thommen Medical AG were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and examined for surface cleanliness. Six implants from three different lots were selected per each implant system. Mean particle counts for each implant and the mean size of the particles were calculated from three different regions of interest and compared using ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis showed presence of particles on the majority of analyzed implant surfaces, and EDX evaluations determined that the particles were made of Al(2)O(3) and thus remnants of the blasting process. SPI®ELEMENT INICELL® and Bone Level (BL) Roxolid® SLActive® implant surfaces showed the highest mean particle counts, 46.6 and 50.3 per area, respectively. The surface of BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant also showed the highest variations in the particle counts, even in samples from the same lot. The mean size of particles was 1120±1011 μm(2), measured for USIII CA Fixture implants, while the biggest particle was 5900 μm(2) found on a BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant. These results suggest that not all manufacturers are able to produce implant surfaces without particle contamination and highlight that the surface modification process with the SA technique should be appropriately designed and controlled to achieve a clean and consistent final medical device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6582880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65828802019-07-04 Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process Schupbach, Peter Glauser, Roland Bauer, Sebastian Int J Biomater Research Article Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse different commercially available implant systems with a SA-modified surface and to explore the widespread notion that they have similar surface properties regarding morphology and cleanliness. SA-modified surfaces of nine implant systems manufactured by Alpha-Bio Tec Ltd, Camlog Biotechnologies AG, Dentsply Sirona Dental GmbH, Neoss Ltd, Osstem Implant Co. Ltd, Institute Straumann AG, and Thommen Medical AG were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and examined for surface cleanliness. Six implants from three different lots were selected per each implant system. Mean particle counts for each implant and the mean size of the particles were calculated from three different regions of interest and compared using ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis showed presence of particles on the majority of analyzed implant surfaces, and EDX evaluations determined that the particles were made of Al(2)O(3) and thus remnants of the blasting process. SPI®ELEMENT INICELL® and Bone Level (BL) Roxolid® SLActive® implant surfaces showed the highest mean particle counts, 46.6 and 50.3 per area, respectively. The surface of BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant also showed the highest variations in the particle counts, even in samples from the same lot. The mean size of particles was 1120±1011 μm(2), measured for USIII CA Fixture implants, while the biggest particle was 5900 μm(2) found on a BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant. These results suggest that not all manufacturers are able to produce implant surfaces without particle contamination and highlight that the surface modification process with the SA technique should be appropriately designed and controlled to achieve a clean and consistent final medical device. Hindawi 2019-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6582880/ /pubmed/31275395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6318429 Text en Copyright © 2019 Peter Schupbach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schupbach, Peter Glauser, Roland Bauer, Sebastian Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process |
title | Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process |
title_full | Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process |
title_fullStr | Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process |
title_full_unstemmed | Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process |
title_short | Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process |
title_sort | al(2)o(3) particles on titanium dental implant systems following sandblasting and acid-etching process |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6318429 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schupbachpeter al2o3particlesontitaniumdentalimplantsystemsfollowingsandblastingandacidetchingprocess AT glauserroland al2o3particlesontitaniumdentalimplantsystemsfollowingsandblastingandacidetchingprocess AT bauersebastian al2o3particlesontitaniumdentalimplantsystemsfollowingsandblastingandacidetchingprocess |