Cargando…

Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process

Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schupbach, Peter, Glauser, Roland, Bauer, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6318429
_version_ 1783428417694203904
author Schupbach, Peter
Glauser, Roland
Bauer, Sebastian
author_facet Schupbach, Peter
Glauser, Roland
Bauer, Sebastian
author_sort Schupbach, Peter
collection PubMed
description Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse different commercially available implant systems with a SA-modified surface and to explore the widespread notion that they have similar surface properties regarding morphology and cleanliness. SA-modified surfaces of nine implant systems manufactured by Alpha-Bio Tec Ltd, Camlog Biotechnologies AG, Dentsply Sirona Dental GmbH, Neoss Ltd, Osstem Implant Co. Ltd, Institute Straumann AG, and Thommen Medical AG were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and examined for surface cleanliness. Six implants from three different lots were selected per each implant system. Mean particle counts for each implant and the mean size of the particles were calculated from three different regions of interest and compared using ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis showed presence of particles on the majority of analyzed implant surfaces, and EDX evaluations determined that the particles were made of Al(2)O(3) and thus remnants of the blasting process. SPI®ELEMENT INICELL® and Bone Level (BL) Roxolid® SLActive® implant surfaces showed the highest mean particle counts, 46.6 and 50.3 per area, respectively. The surface of BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant also showed the highest variations in the particle counts, even in samples from the same lot. The mean size of particles was 1120±1011 μm(2), measured for USIII CA Fixture implants, while the biggest particle was 5900 μm(2) found on a BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant. These results suggest that not all manufacturers are able to produce implant surfaces without particle contamination and highlight that the surface modification process with the SA technique should be appropriately designed and controlled to achieve a clean and consistent final medical device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6582880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65828802019-07-04 Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process Schupbach, Peter Glauser, Roland Bauer, Sebastian Int J Biomater Research Article Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces show enhanced osseointegration and faster bone healing compared with machined surfaces. The sandblasting and acid-etching (SA) process is one technique to create moderately rough dental implant surfaces. The purpose of this study was to analyse different commercially available implant systems with a SA-modified surface and to explore the widespread notion that they have similar surface properties regarding morphology and cleanliness. SA-modified surfaces of nine implant systems manufactured by Alpha-Bio Tec Ltd, Camlog Biotechnologies AG, Dentsply Sirona Dental GmbH, Neoss Ltd, Osstem Implant Co. Ltd, Institute Straumann AG, and Thommen Medical AG were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and examined for surface cleanliness. Six implants from three different lots were selected per each implant system. Mean particle counts for each implant and the mean size of the particles were calculated from three different regions of interest and compared using ANOVA and Tukey's test. SEM analysis showed presence of particles on the majority of analyzed implant surfaces, and EDX evaluations determined that the particles were made of Al(2)O(3) and thus remnants of the blasting process. SPI®ELEMENT INICELL® and Bone Level (BL) Roxolid® SLActive® implant surfaces showed the highest mean particle counts, 46.6 and 50.3 per area, respectively. The surface of BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant also showed the highest variations in the particle counts, even in samples from the same lot. The mean size of particles was 1120±1011 μm(2), measured for USIII CA Fixture implants, while the biggest particle was 5900 μm(2) found on a BL Roxolid® SLActive® implant. These results suggest that not all manufacturers are able to produce implant surfaces without particle contamination and highlight that the surface modification process with the SA technique should be appropriately designed and controlled to achieve a clean and consistent final medical device. Hindawi 2019-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6582880/ /pubmed/31275395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6318429 Text en Copyright © 2019 Peter Schupbach et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schupbach, Peter
Glauser, Roland
Bauer, Sebastian
Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
title Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
title_full Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
title_fullStr Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
title_full_unstemmed Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
title_short Al(2)O(3) Particles on Titanium Dental Implant Systems following Sandblasting and Acid-Etching Process
title_sort al(2)o(3) particles on titanium dental implant systems following sandblasting and acid-etching process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6318429
work_keys_str_mv AT schupbachpeter al2o3particlesontitaniumdentalimplantsystemsfollowingsandblastingandacidetchingprocess
AT glauserroland al2o3particlesontitaniumdentalimplantsystemsfollowingsandblastingandacidetchingprocess
AT bauersebastian al2o3particlesontitaniumdentalimplantsystemsfollowingsandblastingandacidetchingprocess