Cargando…

The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms

BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used to assess child and adolescent mental health problems. However, the factor structure of the SDQ is subject to debate and there is limited evidence investigating measurement equivalence invariance (ME/I) between treatment g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Charlotte L., Guo, Boliang, Valentine, Althea Z., Groom, Madeline J., Daley, David, Sayal, Kapil, Hollis, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218518
_version_ 1783428456993783808
author Hall, Charlotte L.
Guo, Boliang
Valentine, Althea Z.
Groom, Madeline J.
Daley, David
Sayal, Kapil
Hollis, Chris
author_facet Hall, Charlotte L.
Guo, Boliang
Valentine, Althea Z.
Groom, Madeline J.
Daley, David
Sayal, Kapil
Hollis, Chris
author_sort Hall, Charlotte L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used to assess child and adolescent mental health problems. However, the factor structure of the SDQ is subject to debate and there is limited evidence investigating measurement equivalence invariance (ME/I) between treatment groups, informants, and across time. METHOD: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) recruited 250 participants (6–17 years) who had been referred for an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessment. Participants and their clinician either received or did not receive a QbTest report (computer task measuring attention, impulsivity and activity). Parents and teachers completed the SDQ at baseline and 6-months later. This study aimed to understand the factor structure of the SDQ in a clinic referred ADHD sample, and validate the scale as a screening/diagnostic aide and as a measure of treatment outcome both in clinical and research settings. Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM) was performed to examine the factor structure, and ME/I was assessed between treatment groups, informants, and time points. The criterion validity of the SDQ predictive algorithm for ADHD was compared with clinician and research diagnoses using logistic regression and tests of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A 5-factor structure provided the best fit with strong factorial invariance between treatment groups and across time points, but not across informants (parent and teacher ratings). SDQ ratings of ‘probable’ hyperactivity disorder were good predictors of clinical (OR = 10.20, 95%CI 2.18–48.71,p = 0.003) and research diagnoses of ADHD (OR = 6.82, 95%CI 1.95–23.84,p = 0.003), and research diagnoses of Hyperkinetic disorder (OR = 4.02, 95%CI 1.13–14.25,p = 0.031). Further examination of the SDQ hyperactivity ‘probable’ rating showed good specificity (84.5%-74.5%) but poor sensitivity (45.0–42.5%) for ADHD. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate the SDQ is a valid outcome measure for use in RCTs and clinical settings. However, care should be taken when using the SDQ predictive algorithm to screen for ADHD in clinically referred samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6583960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65839602019-06-28 The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms Hall, Charlotte L. Guo, Boliang Valentine, Althea Z. Groom, Madeline J. Daley, David Sayal, Kapil Hollis, Chris PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is widely used to assess child and adolescent mental health problems. However, the factor structure of the SDQ is subject to debate and there is limited evidence investigating measurement equivalence invariance (ME/I) between treatment groups, informants, and across time. METHOD: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) recruited 250 participants (6–17 years) who had been referred for an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessment. Participants and their clinician either received or did not receive a QbTest report (computer task measuring attention, impulsivity and activity). Parents and teachers completed the SDQ at baseline and 6-months later. This study aimed to understand the factor structure of the SDQ in a clinic referred ADHD sample, and validate the scale as a screening/diagnostic aide and as a measure of treatment outcome both in clinical and research settings. Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM) was performed to examine the factor structure, and ME/I was assessed between treatment groups, informants, and time points. The criterion validity of the SDQ predictive algorithm for ADHD was compared with clinician and research diagnoses using logistic regression and tests of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A 5-factor structure provided the best fit with strong factorial invariance between treatment groups and across time points, but not across informants (parent and teacher ratings). SDQ ratings of ‘probable’ hyperactivity disorder were good predictors of clinical (OR = 10.20, 95%CI 2.18–48.71,p = 0.003) and research diagnoses of ADHD (OR = 6.82, 95%CI 1.95–23.84,p = 0.003), and research diagnoses of Hyperkinetic disorder (OR = 4.02, 95%CI 1.13–14.25,p = 0.031). Further examination of the SDQ hyperactivity ‘probable’ rating showed good specificity (84.5%-74.5%) but poor sensitivity (45.0–42.5%) for ADHD. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate the SDQ is a valid outcome measure for use in RCTs and clinical settings. However, care should be taken when using the SDQ predictive algorithm to screen for ADHD in clinically referred samples. Public Library of Science 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6583960/ /pubmed/31216327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218518 Text en © 2019 Hall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hall, Charlotte L.
Guo, Boliang
Valentine, Althea Z.
Groom, Madeline J.
Daley, David
Sayal, Kapil
Hollis, Chris
The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
title The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
title_full The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
title_fullStr The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
title_full_unstemmed The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
title_short The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms
title_sort validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (sdq) for children with adhd symptoms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6583960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218518
work_keys_str_mv AT hallcharlottel thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT guoboliang thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT valentinealtheaz thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT groommadelinej thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT daleydavid thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT sayalkapil thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT hollischris thevalidityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT hallcharlottel validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT guoboliang validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT valentinealtheaz validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT groommadelinej validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT daleydavid validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT sayalkapil validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms
AT hollischris validityofthestrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnairesdqforchildrenwithadhdsymptoms