Cargando…

Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus

OBJECTIVE: Segmented deep brain stimulation leads in the subthalamic nucleus have shown to increase therapeutic window using directional stimulation. However, it is not fully understood how these segmented leads with reduced electrode size modify the volume of tissue activated (VTA) and how this in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, T. A. Khoa, Djilas, Milan, Nowacki, Andreas, Mercanzini, André, Schüpbach, Michael, Renaud, Philipp, Pollo, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217985
_version_ 1783428467843399680
author Nguyen, T. A. Khoa
Djilas, Milan
Nowacki, Andreas
Mercanzini, André
Schüpbach, Michael
Renaud, Philipp
Pollo, Claudio
author_facet Nguyen, T. A. Khoa
Djilas, Milan
Nowacki, Andreas
Mercanzini, André
Schüpbach, Michael
Renaud, Philipp
Pollo, Claudio
author_sort Nguyen, T. A. Khoa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Segmented deep brain stimulation leads in the subthalamic nucleus have shown to increase therapeutic window using directional stimulation. However, it is not fully understood how these segmented leads with reduced electrode size modify the volume of tissue activated (VTA) and how this in turn relates with clinically observed therapeutic and side effect currents. Here, we investigated the differences between directional and omnidirectional stimulation and associated VTAs with patient-specific therapeutic and side effect currents for the two stimulation modes. APPROACH: Nine patients with Parkinson’s disease underwent DBS implantation in the subthalamic nucleus. Therapeutic and side effect currents were identified intraoperatively with a segmented lead using directional and omnidirectional stimulation (these current thresholds were assessed in a blinded fashion). The electric field around the lead was simulated with a finite-element model for a range of stimulation currents for both stimulation modes. VTAs were estimated from the electric field by numerical differentiation and thresholding. Then for each patient, the VTAs for given therapeutic and side effect currents were projected onto the patient-specific subthalamic nucleus and lead position. RESULTS: Stimulation with segmented leads with reduced electrode size was associated with a significant reduction of VTA and a significant increase of radial distance in the best direction of stimulation. While beneficial effects were associated with activation volumes confined within the anatomical boundaries of the subthalamic nucleus at therapeutic currents, side effects were associated with activation volumes spreading beyond the nucleus’ boundaries. SIGNIFICANCE: The clinical benefits of segmented leads are likely to be obtained by a VTA confined within the subthalamic nucleus and a larger radial distance in the best stimulation direction, while steering the VTA away from unwanted fiber tracts outside the nucleus. Applying the same concepts at a larger scale and in chronically implanted patients may help to predict the best stimulation area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6584006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65840062019-06-28 Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus Nguyen, T. A. Khoa Djilas, Milan Nowacki, Andreas Mercanzini, André Schüpbach, Michael Renaud, Philipp Pollo, Claudio PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Segmented deep brain stimulation leads in the subthalamic nucleus have shown to increase therapeutic window using directional stimulation. However, it is not fully understood how these segmented leads with reduced electrode size modify the volume of tissue activated (VTA) and how this in turn relates with clinically observed therapeutic and side effect currents. Here, we investigated the differences between directional and omnidirectional stimulation and associated VTAs with patient-specific therapeutic and side effect currents for the two stimulation modes. APPROACH: Nine patients with Parkinson’s disease underwent DBS implantation in the subthalamic nucleus. Therapeutic and side effect currents were identified intraoperatively with a segmented lead using directional and omnidirectional stimulation (these current thresholds were assessed in a blinded fashion). The electric field around the lead was simulated with a finite-element model for a range of stimulation currents for both stimulation modes. VTAs were estimated from the electric field by numerical differentiation and thresholding. Then for each patient, the VTAs for given therapeutic and side effect currents were projected onto the patient-specific subthalamic nucleus and lead position. RESULTS: Stimulation with segmented leads with reduced electrode size was associated with a significant reduction of VTA and a significant increase of radial distance in the best direction of stimulation. While beneficial effects were associated with activation volumes confined within the anatomical boundaries of the subthalamic nucleus at therapeutic currents, side effects were associated with activation volumes spreading beyond the nucleus’ boundaries. SIGNIFICANCE: The clinical benefits of segmented leads are likely to be obtained by a VTA confined within the subthalamic nucleus and a larger radial distance in the best stimulation direction, while steering the VTA away from unwanted fiber tracts outside the nucleus. Applying the same concepts at a larger scale and in chronically implanted patients may help to predict the best stimulation area. Public Library of Science 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6584006/ /pubmed/31216311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217985 Text en © 2019 Nguyen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nguyen, T. A. Khoa
Djilas, Milan
Nowacki, Andreas
Mercanzini, André
Schüpbach, Michael
Renaud, Philipp
Pollo, Claudio
Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
title Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
title_full Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
title_fullStr Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
title_short Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
title_sort analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31216311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217985
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyentakhoa analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus
AT djilasmilan analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus
AT nowackiandreas analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus
AT mercanziniandre analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus
AT schupbachmichael analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus
AT renaudphilipp analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus
AT polloclaudio analysisofpatientspecificstimulationwithsegmentedleadsinthesubthalamicnucleus