Cargando…

A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier

Microfluidic cellular models, commonly referred to as “organs‐on‐chips,” continue to advance the field of bioengineering via the development of accurate and higher throughput models, captivating the essence of living human organs. This class of models can mimic key in vivo features, including shear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Tyler D., Nowak, Maksymilian, Bayles, Alexandra V., Prabhakarpandian, Balabhaskar, Karande, Pankaj, Lahann, Joerg, Helgeson, Matthew E., Mitragotri, Samir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10126
_version_ 1783428495239544832
author Brown, Tyler D.
Nowak, Maksymilian
Bayles, Alexandra V.
Prabhakarpandian, Balabhaskar
Karande, Pankaj
Lahann, Joerg
Helgeson, Matthew E.
Mitragotri, Samir
author_facet Brown, Tyler D.
Nowak, Maksymilian
Bayles, Alexandra V.
Prabhakarpandian, Balabhaskar
Karande, Pankaj
Lahann, Joerg
Helgeson, Matthew E.
Mitragotri, Samir
author_sort Brown, Tyler D.
collection PubMed
description Microfluidic cellular models, commonly referred to as “organs‐on‐chips,” continue to advance the field of bioengineering via the development of accurate and higher throughput models, captivating the essence of living human organs. This class of models can mimic key in vivo features, including shear stresses and cellular architectures, in ways that cannot be realized by traditional two‐dimensional in vitro models. Despite such progress, current organ‐on‐a‐chip models are often overly complex, require highly specialized setups and equipment, and lack the ability to easily ascertain temporal and spatial differences in the transport kinetics of compounds translocating across cellular barriers. To address this challenge, we report the development of a three‐dimensional human blood brain barrier (BBB) microfluidic model (μHuB) using human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3) and primary human astrocytes within a commercially available microfluidic platform. Within μHuB, hCMEC/D3 monolayers withstood physiologically relevant shear stresses (2.73 dyn/cm(2)) over a period of 24 hr and formed a complete inner lumen, resembling in vivo blood capillaries. Monolayers within μHuB expressed phenotypical tight junction markers (Claudin‐5 and ZO‐1), which increased expression after the presence of hemodynamic‐like shear stress. Negligible cell injury was observed when the monolayers were cultured statically, conditioned to shear stress, and subjected to nonfluorescent dextran (70 kDa) transport studies. μHuB experienced size‐selective permeability of 10 and 70 kDa dextrans similar to other BBB models. However, with the ability to probe temporal and spatial evolution of solute distribution, μHuBs possess the ability to capture the true variability in permeability across a cellular monolayer over time and allow for evaluation of the full breadth of permeabilities that would otherwise be lost using traditional end‐point sampling techniques. Overall, the μHuB platform provides a simplified, easy‐to‐use model to further investigate the complexities of the human BBB in real‐time and can be readily adapted to incorporate additional cell types of the neurovascular unit and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6584314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65843142019-06-27 A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier Brown, Tyler D. Nowak, Maksymilian Bayles, Alexandra V. Prabhakarpandian, Balabhaskar Karande, Pankaj Lahann, Joerg Helgeson, Matthew E. Mitragotri, Samir Bioeng Transl Med Research Reports Microfluidic cellular models, commonly referred to as “organs‐on‐chips,” continue to advance the field of bioengineering via the development of accurate and higher throughput models, captivating the essence of living human organs. This class of models can mimic key in vivo features, including shear stresses and cellular architectures, in ways that cannot be realized by traditional two‐dimensional in vitro models. Despite such progress, current organ‐on‐a‐chip models are often overly complex, require highly specialized setups and equipment, and lack the ability to easily ascertain temporal and spatial differences in the transport kinetics of compounds translocating across cellular barriers. To address this challenge, we report the development of a three‐dimensional human blood brain barrier (BBB) microfluidic model (μHuB) using human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3) and primary human astrocytes within a commercially available microfluidic platform. Within μHuB, hCMEC/D3 monolayers withstood physiologically relevant shear stresses (2.73 dyn/cm(2)) over a period of 24 hr and formed a complete inner lumen, resembling in vivo blood capillaries. Monolayers within μHuB expressed phenotypical tight junction markers (Claudin‐5 and ZO‐1), which increased expression after the presence of hemodynamic‐like shear stress. Negligible cell injury was observed when the monolayers were cultured statically, conditioned to shear stress, and subjected to nonfluorescent dextran (70 kDa) transport studies. μHuB experienced size‐selective permeability of 10 and 70 kDa dextrans similar to other BBB models. However, with the ability to probe temporal and spatial evolution of solute distribution, μHuBs possess the ability to capture the true variability in permeability across a cellular monolayer over time and allow for evaluation of the full breadth of permeabilities that would otherwise be lost using traditional end‐point sampling techniques. Overall, the μHuB platform provides a simplified, easy‐to‐use model to further investigate the complexities of the human BBB in real‐time and can be readily adapted to incorporate additional cell types of the neurovascular unit and beyond. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6584314/ /pubmed/31249876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10126 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Institute of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Brown, Tyler D.
Nowak, Maksymilian
Bayles, Alexandra V.
Prabhakarpandian, Balabhaskar
Karande, Pankaj
Lahann, Joerg
Helgeson, Matthew E.
Mitragotri, Samir
A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier
title A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier
title_full A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier
title_fullStr A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier
title_full_unstemmed A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier
title_short A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier
title_sort microfluidic model of human brain (μhub) for assessment of blood brain barrier
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10126
work_keys_str_mv AT browntylerd amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT nowakmaksymilian amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT baylesalexandrav amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT prabhakarpandianbalabhaskar amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT karandepankaj amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT lahannjoerg amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT helgesonmatthewe amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT mitragotrisamir amicrofluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT browntylerd microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT nowakmaksymilian microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT baylesalexandrav microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT prabhakarpandianbalabhaskar microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT karandepankaj microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT lahannjoerg microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT helgesonmatthewe microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier
AT mitragotrisamir microfluidicmodelofhumanbrainmhubforassessmentofbloodbrainbarrier