Cargando…
First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
The crystal, electronic and magnetic structures of solid oxygen in the epsilon phase have been investigated using the strongly constrained appropriately normed (SCAN) + rVV10 method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + vdW-D + U method. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 method with an 8-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45314-9 |
_version_ | 1783428548058415104 |
---|---|
author | Anh, Le The Wada, Masahiro Fukui, Hiroshi Kawatsu, Tsutomu Iitaka, Toshiaki |
author_facet | Anh, Le The Wada, Masahiro Fukui, Hiroshi Kawatsu, Tsutomu Iitaka, Toshiaki |
author_sort | Anh, Le The |
collection | PubMed |
description | The crystal, electronic and magnetic structures of solid oxygen in the epsilon phase have been investigated using the strongly constrained appropriately normed (SCAN) + rVV10 method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + vdW-D + U method. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 method with an 8-atom primitive unit cell provides lattice parameters consistent with the experimental results over the entire pressure range, including the epsilon-zeta structural phase transition at high pressure, but does not provide accurate values of the intermolecular distances d(1) and d(2) at low pressure. The agreement between the intermolecular distances and the experimental values is greatly improved when a 16-atom conventional unit cell is used. Therefore, the SCAN + rVV10 method with a 16-atom unit cell can be considered the most suitable model for the epsilon phase of solid oxygen. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 model predicts a magnetic phase at low pressure. Since the lattice parameters of the predicted magnetic structure are consistent with the experimental lattice parameters measured at room temperature, our results may suggest that the epsilon phase is magnetic even at room temperature. The GGA + vdW-D + U (with an ad hoc value of U(eff) = 2 eV at low pressure instead of the first-principles value of U(lr)(eff) ~ 9 eV) and hybrid functional methods provide similar results to the SCAN + rVV10 method; however, they do not provide reasonable values for the intermolecular distances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6584638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65846382019-06-26 First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen Anh, Le The Wada, Masahiro Fukui, Hiroshi Kawatsu, Tsutomu Iitaka, Toshiaki Sci Rep Article The crystal, electronic and magnetic structures of solid oxygen in the epsilon phase have been investigated using the strongly constrained appropriately normed (SCAN) + rVV10 method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + vdW-D + U method. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 method with an 8-atom primitive unit cell provides lattice parameters consistent with the experimental results over the entire pressure range, including the epsilon-zeta structural phase transition at high pressure, but does not provide accurate values of the intermolecular distances d(1) and d(2) at low pressure. The agreement between the intermolecular distances and the experimental values is greatly improved when a 16-atom conventional unit cell is used. Therefore, the SCAN + rVV10 method with a 16-atom unit cell can be considered the most suitable model for the epsilon phase of solid oxygen. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 model predicts a magnetic phase at low pressure. Since the lattice parameters of the predicted magnetic structure are consistent with the experimental lattice parameters measured at room temperature, our results may suggest that the epsilon phase is magnetic even at room temperature. The GGA + vdW-D + U (with an ad hoc value of U(eff) = 2 eV at low pressure instead of the first-principles value of U(lr)(eff) ~ 9 eV) and hybrid functional methods provide similar results to the SCAN + rVV10 method; however, they do not provide reasonable values for the intermolecular distances. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6584638/ /pubmed/31217544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45314-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Anh, Le The Wada, Masahiro Fukui, Hiroshi Kawatsu, Tsutomu Iitaka, Toshiaki First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
title | First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
title_full | First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
title_fullStr | First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
title_full_unstemmed | First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
title_short | First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
title_sort | first-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45314-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anhlethe firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen AT wadamasahiro firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen AT fukuihiroshi firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen AT kawatsutsutomu firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen AT iitakatoshiaki firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen |