Cargando…

First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen

The crystal, electronic and magnetic structures of solid oxygen in the epsilon phase have been investigated using the strongly constrained appropriately normed (SCAN) + rVV10 method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + vdW-D + U method. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 method with an 8-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anh, Le The, Wada, Masahiro, Fukui, Hiroshi, Kawatsu, Tsutomu, Iitaka, Toshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45314-9
_version_ 1783428548058415104
author Anh, Le The
Wada, Masahiro
Fukui, Hiroshi
Kawatsu, Tsutomu
Iitaka, Toshiaki
author_facet Anh, Le The
Wada, Masahiro
Fukui, Hiroshi
Kawatsu, Tsutomu
Iitaka, Toshiaki
author_sort Anh, Le The
collection PubMed
description The crystal, electronic and magnetic structures of solid oxygen in the epsilon phase have been investigated using the strongly constrained appropriately normed (SCAN) + rVV10 method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + vdW-D + U method. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 method with an 8-atom primitive unit cell provides lattice parameters consistent with the experimental results over the entire pressure range, including the epsilon-zeta structural phase transition at high pressure, but does not provide accurate values of the intermolecular distances d(1) and d(2) at low pressure. The agreement between the intermolecular distances and the experimental values is greatly improved when a 16-atom conventional unit cell is used. Therefore, the SCAN + rVV10 method with a 16-atom unit cell can be considered the most suitable model for the epsilon phase of solid oxygen. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 model predicts a magnetic phase at low pressure. Since the lattice parameters of the predicted magnetic structure are consistent with the experimental lattice parameters measured at room temperature, our results may suggest that the epsilon phase is magnetic even at room temperature. The GGA + vdW-D + U (with an ad hoc value of U(eff) = 2 eV at low pressure instead of the first-principles value of U(lr)(eff) ~ 9 eV) and hybrid functional methods provide similar results to the SCAN + rVV10 method; however, they do not provide reasonable values for the intermolecular distances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6584638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65846382019-06-26 First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen Anh, Le The Wada, Masahiro Fukui, Hiroshi Kawatsu, Tsutomu Iitaka, Toshiaki Sci Rep Article The crystal, electronic and magnetic structures of solid oxygen in the epsilon phase have been investigated using the strongly constrained appropriately normed (SCAN) + rVV10 method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) + vdW-D + U method. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 method with an 8-atom primitive unit cell provides lattice parameters consistent with the experimental results over the entire pressure range, including the epsilon-zeta structural phase transition at high pressure, but does not provide accurate values of the intermolecular distances d(1) and d(2) at low pressure. The agreement between the intermolecular distances and the experimental values is greatly improved when a 16-atom conventional unit cell is used. Therefore, the SCAN + rVV10 method with a 16-atom unit cell can be considered the most suitable model for the epsilon phase of solid oxygen. The spin-polarized SCAN + rVV10 model predicts a magnetic phase at low pressure. Since the lattice parameters of the predicted magnetic structure are consistent with the experimental lattice parameters measured at room temperature, our results may suggest that the epsilon phase is magnetic even at room temperature. The GGA + vdW-D + U (with an ad hoc value of U(eff) = 2 eV at low pressure instead of the first-principles value of U(lr)(eff) ~ 9 eV) and hybrid functional methods provide similar results to the SCAN + rVV10 method; however, they do not provide reasonable values for the intermolecular distances. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6584638/ /pubmed/31217544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45314-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Anh, Le The
Wada, Masahiro
Fukui, Hiroshi
Kawatsu, Tsutomu
Iitaka, Toshiaki
First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
title First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
title_full First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
title_fullStr First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
title_full_unstemmed First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
title_short First-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
title_sort first-principles calculations of the epsilon phase of solid oxygen
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45314-9
work_keys_str_mv AT anhlethe firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen
AT wadamasahiro firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen
AT fukuihiroshi firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen
AT kawatsutsutomu firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen
AT iitakatoshiaki firstprinciplescalculationsoftheepsilonphaseofsolidoxygen