Cargando…
Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma
BACKGROUND: No standard treatment has been defined for metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Although clinical trials testing Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab for cutaneous melanoma did not include mUM, anti PD-1 agents are commonly used for this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-019-02352-6 |
_version_ | 1783428564000964608 |
---|---|
author | Rossi, Ernesto Pagliara, Monica Maria Orteschi, Daniela Dosa, Tommaso Sammarco, Maria Grazia Caputo, Carmela Grazia Petrone, Gianluigi Rindi, Guido Zollino, Marcella Blasi, Maria Antonietta Cassano, Alessandra Bria, Emilio Tortora, Giampaolo Schinzari, Giovanni |
author_facet | Rossi, Ernesto Pagliara, Monica Maria Orteschi, Daniela Dosa, Tommaso Sammarco, Maria Grazia Caputo, Carmela Grazia Petrone, Gianluigi Rindi, Guido Zollino, Marcella Blasi, Maria Antonietta Cassano, Alessandra Bria, Emilio Tortora, Giampaolo Schinzari, Giovanni |
author_sort | Rossi, Ernesto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No standard treatment has been defined for metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Although clinical trials testing Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab for cutaneous melanoma did not include mUM, anti PD-1 agents are commonly used for this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort single arm study, we investigated efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for mUM. The efficacy was evaluated in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was also assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. A median of 8 cycles were administered (range 2–28). Two patients achieved partial response (11.7%), 6 a disease stabilization (35.3%), whereas 9 (53%) had a progression. No complete response was observed. PFS of the overall population was 3.8 months. PFS was 9.7 months for patients with an interval higher than 5 years from diagnosis of primary tumor to metastatic disease and 2.6 months for patients with an interval lower than 5 years [p = 0.039, HR 0.2865 (95% CI 0.0869–0.9443)]. Median OS was not reached. The two responding patients were still on treatment with Pembrolizumab at the time of data analysis. Survival was 12.8 months for patients with clinical benefit, while OS for progressive patients was 3.1 months. PD-L1 expression and genomic abnormalities predictive of relapse after diagnosis of primary tumor were not associated with PFS. Toxicity was mild, without grade 3–4 side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of Pembrolizumab does not seem particularly different when compared to other agents for mUM, but responding patients had a remarkable disease control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6584707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65847072019-07-05 Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma Rossi, Ernesto Pagliara, Monica Maria Orteschi, Daniela Dosa, Tommaso Sammarco, Maria Grazia Caputo, Carmela Grazia Petrone, Gianluigi Rindi, Guido Zollino, Marcella Blasi, Maria Antonietta Cassano, Alessandra Bria, Emilio Tortora, Giampaolo Schinzari, Giovanni Cancer Immunol Immunother Original Article BACKGROUND: No standard treatment has been defined for metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Although clinical trials testing Nivolumab/Pembrolizumab for cutaneous melanoma did not include mUM, anti PD-1 agents are commonly used for this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort single arm study, we investigated efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for mUM. The efficacy was evaluated in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was also assessed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. A median of 8 cycles were administered (range 2–28). Two patients achieved partial response (11.7%), 6 a disease stabilization (35.3%), whereas 9 (53%) had a progression. No complete response was observed. PFS of the overall population was 3.8 months. PFS was 9.7 months for patients with an interval higher than 5 years from diagnosis of primary tumor to metastatic disease and 2.6 months for patients with an interval lower than 5 years [p = 0.039, HR 0.2865 (95% CI 0.0869–0.9443)]. Median OS was not reached. The two responding patients were still on treatment with Pembrolizumab at the time of data analysis. Survival was 12.8 months for patients with clinical benefit, while OS for progressive patients was 3.1 months. PD-L1 expression and genomic abnormalities predictive of relapse after diagnosis of primary tumor were not associated with PFS. Toxicity was mild, without grade 3–4 side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of Pembrolizumab does not seem particularly different when compared to other agents for mUM, but responding patients had a remarkable disease control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6584707/ /pubmed/31175402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-019-02352-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rossi, Ernesto Pagliara, Monica Maria Orteschi, Daniela Dosa, Tommaso Sammarco, Maria Grazia Caputo, Carmela Grazia Petrone, Gianluigi Rindi, Guido Zollino, Marcella Blasi, Maria Antonietta Cassano, Alessandra Bria, Emilio Tortora, Giampaolo Schinzari, Giovanni Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
title | Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
title_full | Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
title_fullStr | Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
title_short | Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
title_sort | pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00262-019-02352-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossiernesto pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT pagliaramonicamaria pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT orteschidaniela pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT dosatommaso pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT sammarcomariagrazia pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT caputocarmelagrazia pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT petronegianluigi pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT rindiguido pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT zollinomarcella pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT blasimariaantonietta pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT cassanoalessandra pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT briaemilio pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT tortoragiampaolo pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma AT schinzarigiovanni pembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticuvealmelanoma |