Cargando…

Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful parameter that indicates the immunonutritional status of patients with malignant tumors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the value of PNI to predict the outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Material an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Jianyi, Mei, Ying, Zhu, Qiutao, Shou, Chunhui, Tjhoi, Welda E.H., Yang, Weili, Yu, Hang, Zhang, Qing, Liu, Xiaosun, Yu, Jiren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258776
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32299
_version_ 1783428607636406272
author Sun, Jianyi
Mei, Ying
Zhu, Qiutao
Shou, Chunhui
Tjhoi, Welda E.H.
Yang, Weili
Yu, Hang
Zhang, Qing
Liu, Xiaosun
Yu, Jiren
author_facet Sun, Jianyi
Mei, Ying
Zhu, Qiutao
Shou, Chunhui
Tjhoi, Welda E.H.
Yang, Weili
Yu, Hang
Zhang, Qing
Liu, Xiaosun
Yu, Jiren
author_sort Sun, Jianyi
collection PubMed
description Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful parameter that indicates the immunonutritional status of patients with malignant tumors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the value of PNI to predict the outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Material and methods: This study enrolled 431 GIST patients who underwent curative resection from January 2000 to December 2012. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cutoff value of PNI, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Survival curves were produced using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: Of the 431 patients, 209 (48.5%) were male and 222 (51.5%) were female. The median age was 56 (range 20-80 years old). The PNI cutoff value was 47.45, with a sensitivity of 61.1 % and a specificity of 69.9 %. Compared to the PNI-low group (PNI < 47.45), the PNI-high group (PNI ≥47.45) had a significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (5-year RFS rate 89.9% versus 70.8%, p<0.001). Patients with higher PNI (p<0.001), lower NLR (p<0.001) and lower PLR (p=0.002) had significant better prognosis. PNI was found to be an independent prognostic factor of RFS (hazard ratio [HR] =1.967, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.243-3.114, p=0.004). Conclusions: PNI is a simple and useful marker that can predict the prognosis of GIST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6584938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65849382019-06-28 Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors Sun, Jianyi Mei, Ying Zhu, Qiutao Shou, Chunhui Tjhoi, Welda E.H. Yang, Weili Yu, Hang Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaosun Yu, Jiren J Cancer Research Paper Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful parameter that indicates the immunonutritional status of patients with malignant tumors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the value of PNI to predict the outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Material and methods: This study enrolled 431 GIST patients who underwent curative resection from January 2000 to December 2012. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cutoff value of PNI, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Survival curves were produced using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: Of the 431 patients, 209 (48.5%) were male and 222 (51.5%) were female. The median age was 56 (range 20-80 years old). The PNI cutoff value was 47.45, with a sensitivity of 61.1 % and a specificity of 69.9 %. Compared to the PNI-low group (PNI < 47.45), the PNI-high group (PNI ≥47.45) had a significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (5-year RFS rate 89.9% versus 70.8%, p<0.001). Patients with higher PNI (p<0.001), lower NLR (p<0.001) and lower PLR (p=0.002) had significant better prognosis. PNI was found to be an independent prognostic factor of RFS (hazard ratio [HR] =1.967, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.243-3.114, p=0.004). Conclusions: PNI is a simple and useful marker that can predict the prognosis of GIST. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6584938/ /pubmed/31258776 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32299 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Sun, Jianyi
Mei, Ying
Zhu, Qiutao
Shou, Chunhui
Tjhoi, Welda E.H.
Yang, Weili
Yu, Hang
Zhang, Qing
Liu, Xiaosun
Yu, Jiren
Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_fullStr Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_short Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_sort relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258776
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32299
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjianyi relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT meiying relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT zhuqiutao relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT shouchunhui relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT tjhoiweldaeh relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT yangweili relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT yuhang relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT zhangqing relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT liuxiaosun relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT yujiren relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors