Cargando…
Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful parameter that indicates the immunonutritional status of patients with malignant tumors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the value of PNI to predict the outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Material an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258776 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32299 |
_version_ | 1783428607636406272 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Jianyi Mei, Ying Zhu, Qiutao Shou, Chunhui Tjhoi, Welda E.H. Yang, Weili Yu, Hang Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaosun Yu, Jiren |
author_facet | Sun, Jianyi Mei, Ying Zhu, Qiutao Shou, Chunhui Tjhoi, Welda E.H. Yang, Weili Yu, Hang Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaosun Yu, Jiren |
author_sort | Sun, Jianyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful parameter that indicates the immunonutritional status of patients with malignant tumors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the value of PNI to predict the outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Material and methods: This study enrolled 431 GIST patients who underwent curative resection from January 2000 to December 2012. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cutoff value of PNI, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Survival curves were produced using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: Of the 431 patients, 209 (48.5%) were male and 222 (51.5%) were female. The median age was 56 (range 20-80 years old). The PNI cutoff value was 47.45, with a sensitivity of 61.1 % and a specificity of 69.9 %. Compared to the PNI-low group (PNI < 47.45), the PNI-high group (PNI ≥47.45) had a significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (5-year RFS rate 89.9% versus 70.8%, p<0.001). Patients with higher PNI (p<0.001), lower NLR (p<0.001) and lower PLR (p=0.002) had significant better prognosis. PNI was found to be an independent prognostic factor of RFS (hazard ratio [HR] =1.967, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.243-3.114, p=0.004). Conclusions: PNI is a simple and useful marker that can predict the prognosis of GIST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6584938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65849382019-06-28 Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors Sun, Jianyi Mei, Ying Zhu, Qiutao Shou, Chunhui Tjhoi, Welda E.H. Yang, Weili Yu, Hang Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaosun Yu, Jiren J Cancer Research Paper Background: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a useful parameter that indicates the immunonutritional status of patients with malignant tumors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the value of PNI to predict the outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Material and methods: This study enrolled 431 GIST patients who underwent curative resection from January 2000 to December 2012. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cutoff value of PNI, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Survival curves were produced using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using a log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: Of the 431 patients, 209 (48.5%) were male and 222 (51.5%) were female. The median age was 56 (range 20-80 years old). The PNI cutoff value was 47.45, with a sensitivity of 61.1 % and a specificity of 69.9 %. Compared to the PNI-low group (PNI < 47.45), the PNI-high group (PNI ≥47.45) had a significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (5-year RFS rate 89.9% versus 70.8%, p<0.001). Patients with higher PNI (p<0.001), lower NLR (p<0.001) and lower PLR (p=0.002) had significant better prognosis. PNI was found to be an independent prognostic factor of RFS (hazard ratio [HR] =1.967, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.243-3.114, p=0.004). Conclusions: PNI is a simple and useful marker that can predict the prognosis of GIST. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6584938/ /pubmed/31258776 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32299 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Sun, Jianyi Mei, Ying Zhu, Qiutao Shou, Chunhui Tjhoi, Welda E.H. Yang, Weili Yu, Hang Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaosun Yu, Jiren Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title | Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_full | Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_fullStr | Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_short | Relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_sort | relationship of prognostic nutritional index with prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6584938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31258776 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunjianyi relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT meiying relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT zhuqiutao relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT shouchunhui relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT tjhoiweldaeh relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT yangweili relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT yuhang relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT zhangqing relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT liuxiaosun relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT yujiren relationshipofprognosticnutritionalindexwithprognosisofgastrointestinalstromaltumors |